A report in the New York Post indicated that the outgoing administration intends to launch an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) portal app starting in early December in New York City that will allow migrants to bypass in-person check-ins to their local ICE office.

Insiders raised concerns and warned that the move is a “half-baked” plan that will lead more asylum seekers to abscond.

The app, which is set to be launched soon in the form of a pilot program in select cities, will allow the millions of illegal migrants released into the U.S. to await their asylum proceedings and check in with immigration officials on a phone or computer, two sources familiar with the app revealed.

Department of Homeland Security sources told The Post that the app will make it easier for migrants to flee authorities in part because the software has proven to be glitchy and unreliable.

Even when it’s working correctly, the new app doesn’t check for past arrests or outstanding warrants – something the current system tied to in-person appointments does, sources said.

That’s just one of a handful of initiatives being pushed through before inauguration day – including allowing migrants to contest government orders to undergo electronic tracking while they await their immigration appointments.

The Biden admin is also working to make changes that allow migrants to stay in the United States. In yet another move, while the illegal immigrants wait to plead their asylum cases in immigration courts, they will no longer be required to check in with their local ICE field office every few months.

Critics of the illegal border policies of Biden note that under his presidency the number of migrants illegally crossing the southern border exploded, leading to massive lines and backlogs at ICE field offices. And causing many of the problems that systems are encountering today.

CBP commissioner slams Biden’s last-minute move

Former acting Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner Mark Morgan slammed the Biden administration’s last-minute moves as “the opposite of a peaceful transition of power.”

“This is an obstructionist transition,“ said Morgan. “What they’re trying to do in the last final day, they’re going to try to put up as many roadblocks and obstacles and throw as many grenades as they can on their way out.“

Trump’s move to abolish the new Biden policies could be slowed down by court challenges Morgan said. He added that he believes that these were effective in blunting Trump’s immigration policies in his first administration.

As of early last year, the ICE office was already “fully booked through October 2032“ for appointments to process migrants released into the U.S., according to an official document previously reviewed by The Post. A report from City Hall records there have been more than 223,000 migrants have come to the city since the migrant crisis began — and more than 58,000 are still being cared for by taxpayers in city-funded shelters.

Meanwhile, the new border czar of President-elect Trump is giving better instructions on exactly how the military will be used to aid in the mass deportations of illegal immigrants that the incoming administration has promised.

Tom Homan, who served as the ICE acting director during Trump’s first term, debunked frenzied speculation from some liberals that the military could be deployed to arrest people on U.S. streets – saying that service members would be used for “non-enforcement” duties. (Related: Trump’s new border czar will prioritize finding 300,000 missing migrant children who could be trafficking victims.)

Visit InvasionUSA.news for more stories like this. Watch the video below that talks about Biden administration’s handling of illegal immigration.

This video is from the Trending News channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Ramaswamy: DOGE will scrap ENTIRE AGENCIES within the federal government if necessary.
• Stephen Miller, the incoming White House deputy chief of staff, promises “a new golden era” under Trump.
• House Speaker Johnson orders outgoing Biden administration to preserve all records and documents.
• Los Angeles City Council unanimously approves ordinance turning L.A. into a sanctuary city.
• POLL: Majority of Americans support the mass deportation of illegal immigrants.

Sources include:

• NYPost.com 1
• NYPost.com 2
• Brighteon.com

This comes from an investigation conducted by COVID-19 Substack blogger Super Sally, who noted that, adding the number of fewer births and the number of excess deaths from 2020 to 2023, the Philippines had an “unrealized population” – the number of people who should have been living at the time – of about 1.285 million people. (Related: Philippine government reports 297,000 excess deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccines.)

“New readers may be shocked at the excess mortality in 2021, which started only in March of that year,” wrote Sally. However, “I believe that the 2021 mortality and birth data was throttled in early 2022, and the devastation of 2021 will likely be hidden forever.”

Sally’s data comes from an analysis of the PSA, which publishes reports yearly on data collected from the Philippine Civil Registration System, including vital statistics like births, marriages and deaths.

Rise in deaths and decline in births coincide with COVID-19 vaccine rollout

The Philippines’ mass COVID-19 vaccination program was initiated in March 2021, around the same time the country’s unrealized population started surging. While there were a few COVID-19 “vaccine” brands used in the Philippines, the Janssen vaccine by Johnson & Johnson and supplied to the nation through the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX) program of the World Health Organization is believed to be the biggest killer for the country.

“The big spike in deaths which happened in every single region [of the Philippines] in July of 2021 was concurrent with the rollout of Janssen [COVID-19 vaccines] which were delivered to all regions with 3.2 million doses administered within just a few weeks,” wrote Sally. “There was a second death spike in January 2022, also matching the second Philippine delivery of 5.2 million new doses of Janssen.”

“All Janssen doses were delivered under the COVAX program,” she continued. “This is not to say other injectables were not deadly and causative of excess deaths, just that Janssen drove those excess deaths to a new devastating high.”

If 2019 is taken as the last normal and reference year, there have been 908,566 fewer births and 386,939 excess deaths from 2020 through 2023. This gives an “unrealized population” of 1.285 million.

Overall 2023 deaths are slightly higher than 2022 levels, and 2023 births are just slightly lower than 2022 levels. Both may rise slightly in the final reports that will be issued early in 2025.

The deaths are higher than 2022 levels for many months, with even some data points higher than 2021, which was the prior worst year. Early in 2023 births were higher than 2022 and 2021 levels. However, by the end of the year births had dropped, across almost all regions to levels similar to 2021.

Watch this video of a hearing in the Philippine House of Representatives as congressmen investigate the nearly 300,000 excess deaths caused by the COVID-19 vaccines.

This video is from the channel The Prisoner on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Deaths and injuries from COVID-19 vaccines could put insurance companies at risk of bankruptcy.
• Bill Gates’ “days are numbered,” say Japanese scientists after ABORTION DRUGS found in “vaccines.”
• The COVID “vaccine” is an intentional effort at world genocide.
• Report: VACCINES and LOCKDOWNS are responsible for excess all-cause mortality, not COVID-19 infection.
• Study of 125 countries reveals inconvenient truth: Excess mortality was caused by democide and vaccine mandates, not “covid.”

Sources include:

• SHTFPlan.com
• SuperSally.Substack.com
• Brighteon.com

Some of the people feeling anxious over the election are Emily Reeve and her husband, who usually spend Thanksgiving by going on a trip to Hawaii, Florida or even just Disneyland – but not this year.

“I have a toddler now and I’m worried about being in a potentially volatile situation should we be traveling post-election,” said Reeve, 32.

The couple doesn’t have family near their home in Portland, Oregon, so they like to skip town for the November holiday. But they say they’re staying put this time to avoid getting caught in an airport or a popular destination at the same time when news develops of unrest, like rioting or looting “because the people in the area aren’t happy with the election outcome.”

People like Reeve and her husband are among the growing number of people in the United States who are developing anxiety around the election, leading to them rethinking their travel plans. (Related: SURVEY: Over 60% of Americans feel the 2024 presidential election is affecting their mental health.)

Industry experts and travel agents note that this regularly happens around presidential elections and is unavoidable even if they and federal authorities alike attempt to reassure the public that security procedures are in place for Election Day and its aftermath.

The Transportation Security Administration “always remains vigilant in this heightened global threat environment,” a spokesperson said, adding that federal air marshals “continue to carry out critical in-flight security missions” and other duties to keep travelers safe. “We prepare for all contingencies and employ multiple layers of security that are seen and unseen.”

Flyers may notice tighter airport security in coming weeks, said Jeffrey Price, who runs the aviation security consultancy Leading Edge Strategies. In addition to more uniformed officers, “there may also be a combination of plainclothes law-enforcement personnel amongst the passengers,” he said.

Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian recently told CNBC he expected consumers to take “a little bit of a pause” in the weeks around the election, as the carrier has seen in the past.

“People like to be home during the election period. They don’t want to be out traveling,” he said. “I don’t think they want to be spending money until they understand what’s going to happen.”

While the pandemic upended travel during the 2020 vote, Delta also saw demand flag in the run-up to the 2016 ballot before bookings rebounded in subsequent weeks.

United Airlines supported Delta’s findings, with executives saying they expect to see a similar pattern this month and in November and “don’t think there’s anything to be surprised by.”

Businesses are also on alert, said Kelly Soderlund, a spokesperson for the online business travel management company Navan. Its domestic flight bookings are down 19 percent for the week of the election compared with the same week last year. Bookings for the following week, though, are 42 percent higher than the preceding seven days and 82 percent higher than the equivalent week a year ago.

Concerns over possible unrest affecting travel plans this election cycle

Sixty-four percent of U.S. adults said they are avoiding traveling in the U.S. out of concerns about unrest, depending on who wins, according to a recent poll by the travel site The Vacationer.

About 25 percent said they would stay home if Vice President Kamala Harris is elected, while just 16 percent said they would hold off if former President Donald Trump wins. Twenty-four percent said they’re staying put no matter the outcome, and 36 percent said the election’s outcome won’t affect their travel plans.

Another poll, this time from the American Psychological Association, found that 77 percent of Americans are stressed about the future of the country and 69 percent are specifically anxious about the election. Seventy-two percent are worried that the results of the election could lead to violence, and another 56 percent believe the election could be the end of democracy in the United States.

“People feel very strongly about their beliefs, what they want for this country, and how they want issues to be handled,” said psychologist Thea Gallagher of NYU Langone Health. “Depending on who wins the election, it seems like issues are going to be handled differently – that’s a lot to process.”

Watch this episode of “X22 Report” discussing the rising phenomenon of people developing anxiety over the presidential election.

This video is from the Sanivan channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• GALLUP POLL: Americans’ trust in mass media falls to record-low of 31%.
• Survey finds 8 out of 10 Americans fear outbreak of WORLD WAR III.
• Housing market seeing decline in activity due to uncertainty associated with upcoming election.
• Poll: Majority of American teens ANXIOUS about their future and DISILLUSIONED by politicians.

Sources include:

• NBCNews.com
• Fortune.com
• Brighteon.com

Confidential Pfizer documents leaked by Project Veritas show that Big Pharma had “evidence that suggests patients who received a (COVID-19) vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”

Meanwhile, heavily redacted CDC documents obtained by the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request indicate that the agency provided an undercounted figure of post-COVID-19 vaccination myocarditis cases to Israel’s Ministry of Health in early 2021.

The latest revelations come as Germany, Japan and other governments are raising questions about the significant numbers of severe adverse events recorded in individuals following the administration of the vaccines.

“This study clearly shows that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine provides almost no benefit to children and adolescents, but does increase their risk of myocarditis and pericarditis,” said Dr. Brian Hooker, CHD’s chief scientific officer. “It begs the question: Why does the CDC continue to recommend these unlicensed shots for kids? Where is the data they use to support their statement that the benefits of these vaccines outweigh the risks?”

The Pfizer vaccine provided children and teens in England with only about 14 to 15 weeks of protection against the virus, as per a preprint study of over 1.7 million children ages five to 15.

Moreover, researchers investigating the safety and effectiveness of Pfizer’s vaccine in fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated children and teens, also found cases of myocarditis and pericarditis only in vaccinated children. The study found that vaccinated children required slightly fewer emergency room visits and hospital stays, but that those outcomes were extremely rare in children and teens across all groups.

COVID-19 vaccine provides almost no benefit to children, study reveals

Public health agencies in the United Kingdom and the U.S. granted authorization to the Pfizer vaccines based on clinical trials that measured immunogenicity and efficacy against infection.

Their research confirmed that even in 2021, when the vaccine was first authorized for children and teens, that age group did not face a high risk for COVID-19-related serious outcomes, including death or the need for emergency care, hospitalization or critical care.

The researchers tested the effectiveness of the first vaccine dose versus no vaccine and of two doses versus a single dose. They matched each vaccinated child with an unvaccinated one, and participants were matched by age, sex, region, prior COVID-19 testing and childhood vaccination status.

Of the 1,262,784 children in the adolescent part of the study, vaccinated and unvaccinated, there were only 72 emergency room visits, 90 COVID-19 hospitalizations and no deaths. There were nine cases of pericarditis and three cases of myocarditis, all in the vaccinated group.

Among all of the children in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated group, there were no emergency visits, only six hospitalizations and no deaths related to COVID-19. There were three cases of pericarditis, all in vaccinated children.

The researchers concluded that in adolescents, the vaccine reduced the rate of hospitalization more than it increased the risk for myocarditis and pericarditis, but for children, the increased risk of pericarditis was higher than the reduction of risk for hospitalization.

Visit VaccineInjury.news for similar stories. Watch this video featuring a discussion on COVID accountability. This video is from the Sanivan channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• Brighteon.com

Suppliers suspected of having ties to China’s military-industrial complex pose a key risk due to the potential for built-in wireless components in EVs to be “weaponized,” which could even be used to gridlock British streets, according to the report by the China Strategic Risks Institute (CSRI) and the Coalition on Secure Technology.

The so-called Cellular IoT Modules (CIMs) are wireless components embedded in all-electric vehicles and act as a gateway for data to flow in either direction. (Related: Can China remotely control and detonate electric vehicles?)

The report said it was concerned that data generated by Chinese-manufactured EVs operated in the U.K. could end up in the hands of the Chinese state and could be used for surveillance purposes.

This adds to concerns that the British government’s open-door policy to EVs from China threatens to undercut domestic manufacturing. The U.K.’s domestic car industry is responsible for 198,000 manufacturing jobs, representing 2.5 percent of the country’s entire GDP.

CSRI warned that China’s heavy involvement and subsidization of its EV manufacturing sector, allowing the country to produce an excess of five to 10 million EVs per year, along with the British government’s failure to impose restrictions on Chinese EV imports raises the possibility of China posing a threat to British national security and to the country’s car manufacturing industry.

The study comes amid a rapid influx of Chinese automakers into the U.K. market, with the CSRI claiming that Chinese-made EVs have increased their U.K. market share from just two percent in 2019 to 33.4 percent in the first half of 2023.

British government rapidly procuring EVs for the public sector

The U.K. government is rapidly procuring EVs for the public sector. It confirmed last year that some EV units used by the Ministry of Defense had been supplied by MG, a motoring brand owned by Chinese state-owned automobile manufacturing giant SAIC Motor.

Chinese EV giant BYD has also made significant inroads in the British public sector, with at least 1,800 electric buses delivered to local authorities across the country in the past few years.

CSRI warned that London’s refusal to impose restrictions on Chinese EVs, unlike its neighbors in the European Union, could result in Britain becoming a “dumping ground and a potential backdoor into the European market” for Beijing.

The report further warned that Chinese-made CIMs used in EVs could be used to send data back the Beijing about British users. The paper noted that the totalitarian government mandates that all firms within the country provide data access to the state, which was one of the motivating factors for the U.K.’s previous decision to phase out components manufactured by Chinese tech giant Huawei from its 5G networks by 2027.

The CSRI suggested that the U.K. mandate foreign suppliers of EVs to agree to not transmit data overseas under any circumstances, introduce a legal requirement to share their source code with the British government, and allow for regular inspections of data storage centers globally to ensure that sensitive data is not being sent covertly to other servers.

Watch this video warning that new cars, including EVs, could be remote-controlled by governments.

This video is from PureTrauma357 on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Chinese EV hatchback threatening to disrupt U.S. auto sales with very low price and claims of efficiency.
• China continues to rely on coal while pushing expensive renewable energy and EVs on America.
• Low-cost, China-made Volvo EV to be sold in the U.S., threatening Tesla and other EV makers.
• Experts: Biden’s push for China-made EVs poses NATIONAL SECURITY risk.
• STUPID: In order to meet demand for “clean” electric vehicles, China will be forced to burn more COAL.

The FTC report published Sept. 19 expounded on how social media and streaming companies endanger children and teens who use their platforms. It also showed how “the tech industry’s monetization of personal data has created a market for commercial surveillance – especially via social media and video streaming services – with inadequate guardrails to protect consumers.”

Staffers at the commission examined the practices of various Big Tech companies, including Meta Platforms (Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp), YouTube, X, Snapchat, Reddit, Microsoft (Discord), Amazon (Twitch) and ByteDance (TikTok).

Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, outlined in the report that “these companies engaged in mass data collection of their users and – in some cases – non-users.” He also wrote that “many companies failed to implement adequate safeguards against privacy risks.”

The report also expounded on the various ways the aforementioned companies made use of personal data “from serving hypergranular targeted advertisements to powering algorithms that shape the content we see, often with the goal of keeping us hooked on using the service.”

“These practices pose unique risks to children and teens, with the companies having done little to respond effectively to the documented concerns that policymakers, psychologists and parents have expressed over young people’s physical and mental well-being.”

In a statement, FTC Chair Lina Khan said her agency’s report “lays out how social media and video streaming companies harvest an enormous amount of Americans’ personal data and monetize it to the tune of billions of dollars a year.”

“With few meaningful guardrails, companies are incentivized to develop ever-more invasive methods of collection. While lucrative for the companies, these surveillance practices can endanger people’s privacy, threaten their freedoms, and expose them to a host of harms, from identify theft to stalking.”

Bills meant to protect kids online could infringe on First Amendment rights

Following the release of the FTC report, child welfare advocates urged U.S. lawmakers to pass a pair of controversial bills that seek to protect the youth from “dangerous and unacceptable business practices.” But the two proposals, the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA 2.0) and Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), could infringe on young Americans’ rights as guaranteed by the First Amendment.

Josh Golin, executive director of the nonprofit organization Fairplay, lauded the FTC report in a statement. He also called for the COPPA 2.0 and KOSA bills to be enacted into law.

“This report from the FTC is yet more proof that Big Tech’s business model is harmful to children and teens,” he wrote. “Online platforms use sophisticated and opaque techniques of data collection that endanger young people and put their healthy development at risk.”

But rights groups including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have condemned the KOSA. According to the ACLU, the KOSA – which the U.S. Senate passed in July – “would violate the First Amendment by enabling the federal government to dictate what information people can access online and encourage social media platforms to censor protected speech.”

ACLU and other rights groups have pointed out that the KOSA won’t keep children safe. It would instead threaten young people’s privacy, limit minors’ access to vital resources and silence important online conversations for all ages. Moreover, the ACLU has also raised concerns about how this bill could be used to limit adults’ ability to express themselves freely online or access diverse viewpoints.

Visit BigTech.News for similar stories. Watch this video about online privacy and security, and how to protect yourself online.

This video is from the Daily Videos channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Big Government and Big Tech both want your biometric data.
• Social media use linked to TEENAGE DEPRESSION, warn mental health experts.
• Social media is the JUNK FOOD of human connection: Looks and feels like connection, but leaves you empty, just like junk food.

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• ACLU.org.
• Brighteon.com

Conservative legal advocacy organization America First Legal warned that this Haitian resettlement program is still ongoing, and as it continues, concerns over the social and economic implications of such a significant population influx rise. (Related: Chilling backdoor plot involving savage Ohio Haitian migrants is being hidden from the American people.)

U.S. Customs and Border Protection confirmed that the country has experienced a massive influx of Haitian migrants, noting that there have been an estimated 475,004 encounters with Haitian nationals at the border since 2020. Many of these individuals have arrived through a combination of border crossings and the Biden administration’s Humanitarian Parole Program for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans.

Since January 2023, the parole program has granted parole to over 205,000 Haitian nationals, allowing them to fly directly to the U.S. and seek work permits. Upon arrival, many are also granted access to various public services, helping ease their transition into the country. This program aims to streamline migration, offering a legal pathway for thousands of Haitians fleeing the ongoing instability in their homeland.

The migration surge has also resulted in unfortunate incidents, with allegations emerging of crimes perpetrated by some individuals. These incidents include accusations of a Haitian national raping a pregnant woman and another being involved in the murder of an 11-year-old boy on his way to school.

Additionally, another Haitian national has been accused of raping a 15-year-old, while another stands accused of molesting a minor, among other reported crimes. These reports have raised questions about the screening processes in place and the overall management of the growing migrant population.

Biden administration grants asylum to over 300K Haitian migrants

Recently, the Biden administration announced that it was granting temporary protected status (TPS) to approximately 309,000 Haitian migrants who had arrived in the U.S. legally or illegally on or before June 3, claiming that the order that protects them from deportation is necessary to save the lives of Haitians running from organized gang violence.

“We are providing this humanitarian relief to Haitians already present in the United States given the conditions that existed in their home country,” said Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas. “In doing so, we are realizing the core objective of the TPS law and our obligation to fulfill it.”

This comes after several months of intense lobbying by human rights organizations who had been calling on the Biden administration to end the deportation of Haitian migrants over claims that they could end up getting hurt or killed by the gang violence that has broken out in their country.

The shielding of 309,000 Haitians in the U.S. from deportation brings up the total number of Haitians with protected status to roughly 500,000.

Visit OpenBorders.news for more stories like this. Watch this clip from InfoWars featuring Alex Jones warning about how more than a million Haitian migrants are set to make their way to the United States.

This video is from the InfoWars channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• NYPD: Illegal immigrants account for more than half of all arrests in New York City.
• Trump: America has become a DUMPING GROUND for the prison populations of other nations under open borders Biden-Harris administration.
• Biden administration speeding up citizenship request processing to bolster Democratic voter base ahead of election.
• Kamala Harris paves the way for ILLEGALS to become lawyers in California after she helped one in 2014.
• Unrest and collapse are coming to America, just like in Haiti.

Sources include:

• YourNews.com
• NBCNews.com 1
• NBCNews.com 2
• Brighteon.com

Jonathon Von Maren put forward this argument in an Aug. 14 piece on LifeSiteNews, which featured his interview with pro-life statistician and political scientist Dr. Michael New. He cited numbers released by the U.S. Society of Family Planning (SFP) as part of its #WeCount projects to back up his case. According to the group’s estimates, abortion numbers continue to rise.

The SFP found that in the first three months of 2024, the number of abortions increased by 13.8 percent. It also found that during the same period, 20 percent of all abortions were done via telehealth – something Von Maren described as “alarming.”

“When a woman obtains a telehealth abortion, she is mailed chemical abortion pills without an in-person medical exam. Telehealth abortions are self-reported by companies that send abortion pills through the mail. This raises questions about the accuracy of these abortion estimates,” he wrote.

“These companies may have incentives to inflate their numbers. Furthermore, the fact that abortion pills were ordered does not necessarily mean that an abortion was obtained. Some women might have changed their minds. Others might have ordered chemical-abortion pills for future use.” (Related: Kamala Harris: Owned by Big Pharma, big trans, and big abortion.)

Von Maren continued that the increased availability of chemical drugs is causing the rise in abortions. He also noted the Biden administration’s role in making these abortifacient drugs more accessible.

In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded the gestational age limit for chemical abortions from seven weeks to 10 weeks. It also allowed nurse practitioners and other medical professionals that same year to prescribe mifepristone, one of the two drugs used in chemical abortions alongside misoprostol.

Also in 2016, the FDA approved a dosing regimen – requiring women obtaining chemical abortions to make only one visit to a health care professional instead of three. The regulator later announced in 2021 that the one-visit requirement would no longer be enforced.

Shield laws contributed to rise in chemical abortions

Citing data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Von Maren said the percentage of chemically induced infanticide out of all abortions increased from 30.3 percent to 56 percent between 2016 and 2021. He continued: “It should not come as a surprise that after a fairly consistent 36 year decline, the U.S. abortion rate increased in 2017 and has increased since that time.”

In the first quarter of this year, more than 27,000 telehealth abortions took place under shield laws – more than nine percent of the total. Shield laws, which are in effect in six blue states, provide legal protection to medical professionals who send chemical abortion pills into states with legal protections for pre-born children.

“The abortion pill presents a new era in the abortion wars,” New told Von Maren. “Pro-lifers need to prioritize preventing chemical abortions.”

To achieve this goal, he suggested three strategies pro-lifers can take – first of which is using litigation against the FDA. According to New, it can be strongly argued that the FDA did not follow its own rules regarding testing and safety when they eased access to chemical abortion drugs in 2016 and 2021.

A second strategy is using litigation to invalidate shield laws. The pro-life political scientist noted that attorneys general in several red states are reportedly mulling various litigation strategies against the six blue states with shield laws in place.

Lastly, New suggested electing a pro-life president as a third strategy. He expressed hope that the pro-life president would simply appoint FDA personnel who would limits on the shipment and use of chemical abortion drugs if elected.

“Donald Trump has certainly not made any promises to place limits on chemical abortions. However, his FDA appointees would certainly be more sympathetic to the concerns of pro-lifers than an appointees made by Kamala Harris,” New remarked.

Visit Abortions.news for similar stories. Watch this ABC News report about Arizona residents voting on abortion rights this November.

This video is from the TrendingNews channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Utah Sen. Mike Lee tells Tucker Carlson: Abortion is now a “sacrament” to leftists like Kamala Harris.
• Pro-life expert debunks claim that abortion restrictions are linked to maternal deaths.
• Florida woman sues Google for deplatforming after she sent pro-life email through Gmail.

Sources include:

• LifeSiteNews.com
• NationalReview.com
• Brighteon.com

Big League Politics reported, citing the Daily Mail, that researchers at Hebei Medical University were responsible for this dangerous endeavor. The scientists “utilized a contagious disease of livestock and added a protein found in Ebola, which allows the pathogen to infect cells and spread throughout the human body.” This oddly mirrored the gain-of-function research done with bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which later gave rise to COVID-19.

The resulting pathogen was then injected into hamsters, who died within two to three days. Predictably, those given the lethal virus “developed severe systemic diseases similar to those observed in human Ebola patients – including multi-organ failure” as per the study published in the journal Virologica Sinica. “One particularly horrific symptom saw the infected hamsters develop secretions in their eyes, which impaired their vision and scabbed over the surface of the eyeballs.”

“The study suggested that infected hamsters could be a decent model for studying the spread and treatment of Ebola in the future,” the Mail pointed out. “But lab leaks happen, and these incidents could lead to the spread of [the modified pathogen] to those outside of the lab.

Ebola needs to be handled in Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) facilities which are special high security laboratories, while many are only BSL-2. The WIV is one example of a BSL-4 facility, but SARS-CoV-2 – a product of gain-of-function research – managed to escape its confines.

“Apparently, the lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic haven’t been learned. Dangerous biolab experiments continue – humanity be damned,” Big League Politics said.

China making the next BIOWEAPON against humanity

The Mail continued that the researchers harvested organs from the dead animals. They found that the virus accumulated in the heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, stomach, intestines and brain tissues. The highest viral load was found in the liver, while the lowest was in the brain.

Given the stringent BSL-2 security requirement for Ebola, the scientists used the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) for their experiment. They engineered VSV, which mainly infects livestock, to carry a part of the Ebola virus called glycoprotein (GP). The GP plays a crucial role in helping the virus enter and infect host cells. (Related: HUMAN LAB RATS: Getting “vaccinated” for monkeypox automatically enrolls you in WHO data collection “clinical trial.”)

According to Big League Politics, Ebola ravaged parts of Africa 10 years ago. The National Library of Medicine defines Ebola virus disease, formerly called Ebola hemorrhagic fever, as an “iconic hemorrhagic fever.”

More common symptoms of the disease are non-specific such as fever, malaise, headache, diarrhea or vomiting. Ebola virus disease can quickly progress to multiple organ failure leading to shock, followed by death. The case fatality rate ranges from between 25 and 90 percent, with the average rate about 50 percent.

“Experts have confirmed that respiratory viruses – which are spared via coughing and sneezing – are more likely to spread widely through a population,” the British tabloid continued.” Data released this March revealed that lab leak incidents occur every year and include the release of controlled pathogens like tuberculosis and anthrax.

Head over to Infections.news for similar stories. Watch this video about nurses being injected with the experimental Ebola vaccine. This video is from the Preacher channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Babies of lab rats vaccinated for covid suffer rib malformations.
• Editorial: UChicago must end its booster mandate … we are not lab rats.
• ‘We are lab rats’: Israeli vaccine victims want their lives back.
• Wuhan lab where coronavirus is believed to have originated eligible for TAXPAYER FUNDING until 2024.
• Wuhan lab ordered U.S.-based partner to destroy evidence.

Sources include:

• BigLeaguePolitics.Substack.com
• Brighteon.com

LifeSiteNews pointed out that “for decades, the medical community insisted vaccines are the most thoroughly studied product ever.” Dr. Paul Offit, a member of the Food and Drug Administration‘s (FDA) vaccine advisory committee, once said: “I think we should be proud of vaccines as arguably the safest, best tested things we put in our body.”

But according to attorney Aaron Siri, managing partner of the Siri & Glimstad law firm, those who suffer from vaccine injuries beg to differ. He said that “for decades, parents of vaccine injured children, vaccine injured adults and other stakeholders have contested these claims.” These victims, Siri added, have been “shunned and attacked by the medical community and health agencies.”

Plotkin developed the vaccine to stop rubella (German measles), which caused tens of thousands of severe birth defects in the U.S. alone, in the 1960s. He went on to work on the vaccines for polio, rabies, anthrax and rotavirus. Plotkin’s influence stretches to the present day, with him being named as a consultant for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine. (Related: Longtime pro-jab apologist finally comes clean about lack of science proving vaccine safety.)

Siri recounted that in 2018, he had the chance to depose Plotkin. But following this deposition, the vaccinologist went on a tirade ostensibly in support of vaccine safety.

Plotkin urged the FDA to add “missing information on safety and efficacy” in vaccine package inserts, and called for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to exclude harms from its vaccine information sheets. He also called for “lobbying the Gates Foundation to support pro-vaccine organizations” and working to have the World Health Organization (WHO) list vaccine hesitancy as a global threat.

Siri: Don’t be fooled by the admissions of Plotkin and his buddies

But the lawyer broke down Plotkin’s tirades, pointing out that they “don’t work” as “there are no proper safety studies” from square one.

“There is no safety data to add to the FDA package inserts, and hiding harms by removing them from CDC inserts doesn’t make them go away. Parents and other adults don’t simply stop believing what they have seen with their own eyes because [health authorities] won’t acknowledge them, or worse, they attack them,” said Siri.

“That brings us to the present in which Plotkin and his disciples realize they can’t cast voodoo on the public. They can’t hide the truth. So, their only option is to try and co-op the truth they have lied about for decades by admitting that the studies to show vaccines that are safe do not exist. But in making that admission, they conveniently fail to admit that for decades they lied, gaslit, defrauded the public by claiming that vaccines are probably the most thoroughly safety tested products on the planet and that people should rest assured, no stone on vaccine safety was left unturned.”

Siri also pointed out that Plotkin and his colleagues “pretend they never lied about vaccine safety … [and] are now just pointing out vaccine safety [testing] has never really been conducted.”

“Don’t be fooled. Their real agenda is plain, and it is not to study vaccine safety, but rather to confirm that which they already believe. This is crystal clear from the fact that, while their article admits the studies have not been done, they write in the same breath that serious vaccine harms are ‘rare,'” he continued.

“But if the studies have not been done, how do they know that? The answer is, they don’t, and they don’t care to know the truth. Their goal is to protect the products they have spent their careers defending and worshiping and that have brought them fame and riches. They also ignore the mountain of studies and data, which already exist that clearly show serious vaccine harms.”

Watch a video of Dr. Stanley Plotkin answering questions by lawyer Aaron Siri about vaccines.

This video is from the Absolute Reality Clips channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Merck defrauded the public for over a decade, falsely advertising their MMR vaccine as “safe and effective” against staggering evidence.
• Canada’s COVID-19 VACCINE INJURY program tops $14M in payouts, with hundreds of claims still left unpaid.
• Trump calls RFK Jr. after assassination attempt, talks about vaccine injuries: WATCH.
• Mandating COVID shots ‘one of the greatest mistakes,’ former CDC chief says.
• Former CDC director: Mandating COVID-19 injections one of the GREATEST MISTAKES ever made.

Sources include:

• Lifesitenews.com
• Brighteon.com