On the face of it, this seems not particularly controversial or surprising. Waggaman cited numerous sources in Russian newspaper articles and Russian government  sites and, after all the US has  been injecting its entire armed forces with the untested toxic shots since September last year. As has the UK. It’s apparently de rigueur to poison your own military as well as your own population in these mad days.

However, Waggaman’s original article quickly produced a vehement response from Thomas Röper, a German writer living in Russia. Writing on his own blog Röper denied there was any compulsory jabbing of any Russian service personnel, quoted the Russian MoD as  evidence and described Waggaman’s claim unambiguously as a “hoax”.

Waggaman in turn responded to Röper’s response, citing several more official Russian sources seeming to confirm his original claim.

Yesterday the prominent COVID skeptic Robin Monotti, whose Telegram group has over 100,000 followers, shared Röper’s article. The question was also discussed on UK Column, with Vanessa Beeley offering support for Röper’s version while Iain Davis offered a wider factual perspective. Unfortunately Waggaman didn’t appear in the UKC discussion so we were not able to hear any responses he might have had.

So, who’s correct? Is Russia mandating covid jabs for its armed forces including the mobilised reservists – or not?

Well, let’s look at the data and you tell me what you think.

Back on June 16 of 2021, Moscow introduced mandatory Sputnik jabs for people working in a wide variety of fields, announced by TASS with this headline

Mandatory vaccination against coronavirus in Moscow and the Moscow region…

Two days later, June 18, the Russian MoD anounced a “mandatory” covid jab program for the military (our emphasis)

Heads of military administration bodies, commanders of formations, military units and heads of organizations to ensure mandatory preventive vaccinations for epidemic indications against the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19)

Four days after that, June 22, it was announced conscripts would also be included in the vax program

The Ministry of Defense intends to vaccinate all conscripts who joined the army as a result of the spring conscription against COVID-19. Vaccination of conscripts is intended to be completed by July 15, it is being carried out as a matter of priority, said Deputy Defense Minister Timur Ivanov, TASS reports.

Then we have the  Russian government info portal Explain last year again specifically stating that vaccines are “mandatory” for military personnel, including “those called for mobilization”, (our emphasis)

Medical care for military personnel is a priority for the state. In accordance with the Resolution of the Chief Sanitary Doctor of the Ministry of Defense of Russia No. 129 of June 18, 2021, mandatory immunization applies to all categories of military personnel, including those called for mobilization.

We also have Defence Minister Shoigu proclaiming also last year:

“We have already received more than a million doses of [covid] vaccine, we have 910 thousand vaccinated. We completed vaccination in our main units a month ago,”

Then, just yesterday (Oct 7 2022) state Duma deputy Fedot Tumusov interviewed by RadioSputnik, added this (editor comment added by Sputnik).

As far as I know, the decree on vaccination against COVID-19 in the troops is still in force. The issue of vaccination of military personnel (including mobilized, – ed.) is decided by the chief sanitary doctor of the Ministry of Defense,”

Tumusov further added (our emphasis):

I believe that the mobilized must be vaccinated against COVID-19. The coronavirus in the country as a whole has declined, but there is still a danger of its spreading in the army, there are a lot of people there. It is important that combat capability does not decrease due to the coronavirus. I think it is necessary to vaccinate and revaccinate those who were mobilized and the rest of the military,”

I think it looks undeniable that the Russian government did announce a “mandatory” vax policy for its military in 2021.

So, why does Röper claim it to be a hoax?

Röper has what he calls a “direct line to the press office of the Russian Ministry of Defense”. He apparently called this office recently to ask whether the mobilised were to get compulsory vaccine, he  quotes this body as saying in response

These are Russian citizens and vaccinations are voluntary in our country

So, there seems to be quite some anomaly here. Are vaccines “mandatory” as alleged in numerous official Russian outlets or “voluntary” as alleged in this conversation with Röper?

Röper opts to believe the latter and on this basis accuses Waggaman of a “hoax”.

You decide if this is reasonable.

Röper doesn’t interrogate this single sentence statement from someone (who?) in the MoD for disambiguation or qualification, let alone acknowledge the contradiction. In fact he flatly ignores all the primary evidence of the central  government promoting jabs for professional servicemen and conscripts and even claims, or rather suggests, in his blog that such evidence doesn’t exist.

In Russia, there is an old saying that is still topical today, it reads: “Moscow is far away” and means that in Russia it can happen again and again that regional officials believe that they can interpret rules differently than Moscow claims. Therefore, I like to believe that – as quoted in the Russian portals – some regional representatives of the health authorities say that they would like to forcibly vaccinate the mobilized soldiers, but the Russian Ministry of Defense sees it differently. Therefore, it is more than questionable whether these announcements will be followed by any deeds in individual Russian regions, because it is unlikely that the employees of the regional health offices will come to the barracks at all.

No. This is a reach too far. While some regions may, for all I know, have been overzealous in their vax policy, Röper can’t – or should not – just airbrush the fact that, officially and on paper at least, the Russian central government, in the person of Shoigu and others, has been very vocally promoting mass jabs for both regular soldiers and the newly mobilised. It’s poor journalism, in fact poor ethics to simply tell your readers this data does not exist.

In this regard Röper’s response can only be described as misleading. The Russian state did announce a mandatory COVID jab policy and that fact needs to be acknowledged however much we might reasonably debate over exactly what that policy amounted to in real terms.

Which leads us to a second point that’s possibly more important longterm.

Before the launch of the Special Military Operation in February this year, I don’t think Waggaman’s article would have been controversial for most of us. Back then I think we all knew and accepted that all major powers, including Russia, were promoting the fake pandemic in unison. We knew they were all seemingly equally determined to lock up, terrorize, mentally torture and experiment on their own citizens. We knew they all talked with the same forked tongue about vax uptake and played weasel games with what “voluntary” could be twisted to incorporate, and we didn’t expect any of them to deal honestly or consistently.

But, whether intentionally or by happy accident, the “special military operation”  has changed that. There’s a war on and polarised wartime thinking has begun to replace generalised skepticism. It has reactivated deep and long-standing horizontal divisions and dormant loyalties.

It’s hard to support your chosen good guys while simultaneously being aware of their cold blooded deception, betrayal and murder of their own citizens. So, amnesia tends to kick in along with a tendency to selectively abandon skepticism and to forgive, underplay, deny or even endorse the lies told by those we designate our heroes.

The advantages of this to both sides as well as to any common agenda they share barely need to be stated.

It creates confusion, moral ambiguity. It diverts attention. Above all it weakens and fragments opposition.

And, if you are Biden or Putin, the number of vocal critics you have to deal with becomes suddenly and effectively halved.

Whereas before you had 100% of skeptics and freedom advocates collectively opposing your anti-human policies, you can now, thanks to the war, expect 50% of them to be on your side and turn into unwitting fifth columnists, happy to justify your abuses because YOU are doing them and not the Other Guy.

The extreme and divisive language used by Röper is an exemplar of how binary thinking benefits narrative managers. Röper has converted the question of Russia’s vax policy from being a question of pure fact into a cause célèbre in which he feels the need to defend Russia’s ‘honor’ like a courtly knight defending an outraged damsel.

How dare Waggaman suggest Russia would mandate the vax for anyone. It’s an assault on heroes and basic moral values and it needs to be refuted

– even if it might actually be true.

The same is happening the other way round of course. The pro-NATO, pro-Ukraine lobby have become equally amnesiac and emotionally triggered, lauding Nazis as freedom fighters and fat little corrupt circus clowns as brave war leaders.

Political insights and discourse on both sides are retrograding into Cold War rhetoric, everything learned in the past two years willingly abandoned.

There’s a third thing here too that’s being missed –

The bizarreness of the fact that in the midst of what is purported to be a proxy war to the death between NATO and Russia, with, we are assured (by the MSM and some alt media), nukes about to fly, both sides are apparently intent on filling their serving soldiers with potentially disabling or lethal poison – in order to “protect” against a pandemic they both know doesn’t actually exist.

• Who – seriously, who – potentially poisons their own standing army in the midst of an existential struggle for survival?
• Why are these supposedly diametrically opposed ideologies, so alienated from one another they stand on the brink of mutual annihilation, still peddling the same silly, and now surely meaningless, bullshittery about a made up disease?

I mean, this is quite strange, right. It might be even stranger than the fact Ukraine, in the midst of this deadly confrontation, is still allowing Russian gas to transit its territory and is being paid by Russia to do so.

Can we try to step away from the reactivation of WW2 and Cold War tropes and flag-waving war hysteria long enough to really think about all this, calmly and rationally?

Because while the flags are waving and the fear of Armageddon haunts us there is another something moving ever closer – another rough beast whose hour is nearly here. And I think by now we all know its name.

It won’t blow you to smithereens in a single moment, in fact you will barely notice it arrive, but its grip will be cold and deadly.

Article cross-posted from Off-Guardian.

1. The alleged “new virus”
2. The alleged test for the “new virus”
3. The alleged “new disease” caused by the “new virus”.

Deft manipulation of these three concepts – like the cups in a carnival sideshow game of pea-and-thimble – is how so many people were convinced they were looking at something undeniably real.

There MUST be a new virus – because there’s a NEW test for it There MUST be a valid test – because it can identify the new virus There MUST be a new disease because it has all these NEW symptoms.

People saw these three points and drew lines joining them in a neat triangle.

What few realized was the apparent connection was only alleged, imaginary. A kind of pareidolia.

There was NEVER any actual connection between these three things. They even tell us so in the official narrative – if you pay attention.

The illusion of connection is just the quickness of the propaganda deceiving the eye.

Let’s break it down.

1. THE NEW VIRUS

Again and again people say “there must be a new disease – THEY FOUND THE VIRUS.”

No. They did not. They found a virus. Allegedly. A potentially ‘new’ coronavirus. Maybe.

Some highly qualified people claim this “new virus” only exists as a theory. In silica – meaning inside a computer. A digitally rendered thought-conception of what the DNA of an alleged new SARS-coronavirus might look like on the genetic level. But even if it happens to be a real physical discovery, let’s get that in perspective.

Some people seem to think finding a ‘new virus’ is as unusual and remarkable as finding a new species of Great Ape or big cat. A noteworthy moment. Something to remark on. No, it isn’t.

Finding a new virus any time is as remarkable as finding a bee in a beehive. A beehive containing several billion bees that are constantly reproducing and mutating.

Virus theory dictates ‘new’ viruses emerge every day in their millions. There are literally said to be 10 nonillion viruses on the planet – that’s a one followed by thirty-one zeros. So, finding a new one – if you’re looking for it – should be more common than not

And the chance that any one you find happens to be the same one causing some new symptom in some human is about as good as your chance of dipping in your billion-strong beehive and picking out the bee you saw on your lavender bush yesterday.

So, even if you unconditionally accept the theories of virology, the ‘new virus’ in itself means nothing, unless there is something to tie this virus to an identifiable unique disease. And of course that’s where the test comes in…right?

2. THE TEST

Many people, even those sceptical of the vax and the whole “pandemic” narrative, still seem to get hooked on the “test”. I mean it’s a test. It must be testing for something. And what’s more – it finds it!

People ‘test positive’. How can you test positive for something that isn’t there? Well, of course the inventor of the PCR, who tragically died in 2019, could have told you exactly how you can test positive for something that isn’t there. And if he hadn’t died you could have bet the fortune you spent on masks he would have been telling you – loudly and often.

We have also told you – here and here and here. To put it bluntly –

THE PCR DOES NOT IDENTIFY THE PRESENCE OF THE ALLEGED NEW VIRUS.

It can’t. It literally can’t. Even if done right. And especially when done wrong – which most of the ‘covid’ PCRs were. A “positive” test could mean they had found some bits of RNA that belonged to some non-specific coronavirus. Or it could mean they just found some junk in your system.

It never meant they had literally found SARSCOV2. So, the assumed line joining those two points of the triangle never actually existed. Without the PCR there is literally nothing to connect the alleged ‘new virus’ and the alleged ‘new disease’.

But that’s just nitpicking, right? I mean, there’s a new disease so it stands to reason there must be a new virus causing it. Even if the test is hopelessly flawed, even useless, surely the mere fact there is a new virus and a new disease suddenly present at the same time must mean cause and effect?

3. THE NEW DISEASE

A disease is classified as “new” when it presents a unique, repeated pattern of clinical symptoms and pathology. Despite everything you absorbed through media and memes, there are NO unique clinical symptoms associated with ‘COVID’. Sure, some have been hyped as such, but that was all it was – hype.

Two examples –

1. Loss of taste and smell? Pretty common respiratory virus symptom, can be longterm due to nerve damage in some cases.
2. Ground glass opacities? Oh please, GGOs are a common non-specific finding in lung pathology. You can have them for any reason from inhaling an irritant to having pneumonia or TB.

Truth is – every alleged ‘covid symptom’ is also a ‘flu’ symptom or a cold symptom or a ‘common seasonal respiratory infection’ symptom, or a post-viral fatigue symptom.

Whatever hype you have ingested, this is the plain truth (which our updated COVID cribsheet will soon cover in detail). In fact the only ‘new’ thing about ‘COVID’ — is the name.

And the massive PR machine associated with it.

The rest, in fact the entire perception of solid multifocal ‘reality’, was just a creation, a clever bit of perception-manipulation and engendered attention bias. A trick in other words. So, what does our connective triangle look like now? Well, it’s actually just three unconnected random dots.

1. A ‘new’ virus, one of millions emerging every day, which may or may not have been isolated
2. A ‘test’ for the above that doesn’t actually test for it
3. A bunch of old symptoms given a new name…

Literally nothing real to connect them at all. None of those fast-moving cups bewildering your eye ever actually had the pea inside it.

That carnie just played a lot of us for fools.

Article cross-posted from Off-Guardian.