If the brave and the bold had not steadfastly resisted the propaganda and the totalitarianism, then the world would be in a much different place today – oppressed by vaccine passports, endless booster requirements, slavery and death. Without the growing health freedom movement, populations would be subject to the constant threat of societal segregation, loss of parental rights, censorship, intimidation and discrimination in the workplace, and intellectual suicide. In fact, America could very easily be dealing with quarantine camps if it weren’t for widespread awareness and resistance to the medical tyranny.

Quarantine camps were originally planned for U.S. communities

As medical tyranny was placated in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) rolled out a series of totalitarian policies that fundamentally altered daily life, ranging from insidious mask mandates, social distancing insanity to discriminatory business closures, travel restrictions, plexiglass barriers and societal segregation for those who did not submit to deadly medical experiments.

However, these measures, which were already draconian in their impact, were only a fraction of what was originally planned. An ignored CDC document reveals that a far more extreme and authoritarian approach was in the works — one that would have involved widespread isolation of individuals who were deemed “high-risk” in government-controlled quarantine camps. These quarantine camps were to be erected out of existing communities. People’s homes and property rights were to be seized, as families were set to be separated and cordoned off in different homes in the community.

In July 2020, the CDC quietly released the plan titled, “Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings.” This document, which remained on the CDC’s public website until March 2023, outlined a disturbing proposal to create nationwide isolation camps for individuals deemed “vulnerable.” This plan would have seen people forcibly separated from their families, their communities and even their religious practices, all in the name of “public health and safety.”

The plan — never fully implemented but disturbingly detailed — called for the forced relocation of “high-risk” individuals to what were effectively quarantine zones, under the CDC’s concept of “shielding.” These “green zones,” as the document described them, would isolate older adults and people with serious underlying health conditions, physically separating them from the general population to prevent them from coming into contact with individuals who were deemed “low-risk.”

The CDC’s proposal was not limited to households but extended to entire neighborhoods and even camps or sectors, which would have been scattered across the country. These camps were to house up to 50 high-risk individuals per zone, with strict controls over movement and a single-entry point for food and supplies. The plan even discussed the need for dedicated staff to monitor these zones and ensure that individuals adhered to strict isolation protocols.

Architects behind quarantine camps must be exposed

While the CDC stressed that the “shielding approach” was not meant to be coercive, it quickly acknowledged the inherent psychological dangers of such isolation. The document warned that being cut off from family, faith and community could lead to emotional distress, depression and even suicide among those confined in the zones. In fact, the CDC outlined procedures for preventing suicides and ensuring that the mentally ill in isolation were assigned caregivers to avoid neglect and abuse.

Perhaps most shockingly, the document included no provisions for legal appeals or any form of due process for those who were deemed “high-risk.” There was no mention of legal counsel or any recourse for individuals who disagreed with being forcibly removed from their homes or communities. The plan essentially outlined how individuals could be imprisoned without trial or representation under the guise of protecting them from a virus.

The document’s language is chilling, with deranged government officials assuming absolute control over individuals’ movements, families and rights. It suggests a system where the government could decide who lives and who is isolated based on public health determinations. This raises profound ethical questions about the role of government in dictating personal lives, as well as the capacity for abuse when such powers are unchecked.

The CDC’s quarantine camp plan, had it succeeded, would have been the ultimate realization of a medical police state. The removal of this plan from public view in 2023 does not erase the truth of its existence, the planning behind it, or the chilling implications of what could have been. Full disclosure of these maniacal plans must be made available to the public, and the architects must be publicly shamed, so that this never comes close to happening again.

Sources include:

• Brownstone.org
• Web.archive.org
• AHRP.org

This new syndrome comes on the heels of a global mRNA vaccine experiment that destroyed human blood composition and quality and exacerbated inflammation throughout the body. This experiment infiltrated the human race with foreign spike proteins that caused widespread blood clotting disorders, myocarditis and pericarditis, while interfering with normal, healthy protein and hormone production of the cell. One study found an increased risk of epilepsy, severe allergic shock, myocarditis and appendicitis in children injected with COVID-19 vaccines, indicating systemic blood and immunological damage.

AHA won’t address the causes of this new disease

The AHA’s announcement raises significant questions about the causes behind such a widespread health crisis. According to the AHA’s recent statistical update, nearly one-third of American adults are believed to have multiple risk factors contributing to CKM syndrome, including obesity, Type 2 diabetes and kidney disease. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) corroborates these findings, noting that 90 percent of U.S. adults meet the criteria for CKM syndrome at stage 1 or higher. The lack of historical data — CKM syndrome was only introduced last fall — adds a layer of complexity to understanding the implications of this diagnosis.

The study highlights significant demographic disparities, with older adults, men and black individuals facing the greatest risk. However, the study does not address any environmental causes for this condition. The elephant in the room is the mRNA vaccine experiment, which harms all of these physiological processes mentioned in the new diagnostic guidelines. For instance, an Oxford study revealed that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are the sole cause of heart inflammation and heart failure in children.

New disease label mirrors the damage done by global mRNA vaccine experiment

The invention of this new disease label demands an urgent and thorough investigation into potential root causes, particularly with the mRNA vaccines, which damage all these organ and endocrine systems of the body. Instead of addressing these critical inquiries, however, mainstream medical discourse appears to be pivoting toward the development of new treatments, positioning pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer and Merck to benefit significantly from this shift. In fact, Pfizer has already begun acquiring drug companies to profit from chronic diseases caused by their own COVID-19 “vaccines.”

While the AHA’s new classification of CKM syndrome could lead to advancements in treatment, there is a conspicuous lack of emphasis on prevention or root cause analysis. Instead, the focus is on managing symptoms and prescribing patented medications — a stark contrast to the traditional adage, “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”

Shouldn’t medical authorities be asking basic questions about the sudden emergence of a new medical condition that impacts nearly an entire population? Slapping a new label on most Americans doesn’t fix the problem, but it does set individuals up to be patients for life, while covering up the root causes.

The disconnection between diagnosis and proactive healthcare solutions raises critical ethical concerns. As the medical community gears up for potential profit-driven initiatives surrounding CKM syndrome, the question looms: Is genuine healthcare the priority, or merely the expansion of a corporate healthcare model that prioritizes the lifelong drugging of patients over prevention and addressing root causes?

Sources include:

• Armageddonepose.substack.com
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com

Plasmids, which are used in the manufacturing process for vaccines, carry genetic material that can inadvertently enter the human body through vaccination. Plasmids can disrupt cellular functions or contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. These fragments have the potential to integrate into the DNA of vaccinated individuals, potentially disrupting the function of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. One troubling aspect is the inclusion of sequences from the SV40 virus, known for its cancer-causing properties. The implications of such contamination are dire, with experts warning of the potential for permanent genetic changes in vaccine recipients.

This serious safety concern necessitates that ALL recombinant vaccines be investigated for DNA contamination. The current findings on DNA contamination across the vaccine supply are startling, and warrant an audit into the manufacturing processes of vaccines, including investigations into the role adjuvants and lipid nanoparticles play in facilitating the DNA contamination of human cells.

Australia taking DNA contamination of COVID vaccines seriously now

The Port Hedland council in Australia recently passed a motion recognizing “unacceptable levels of plasmid DNA contamination” in mRNA COVID vaccines. The motion, which also mandated the dissemination of this information to health practitioners and vaccine recipients, represents a significant shift in how vaccine safety concerns are addressed. Given Port Hedland’s economic significance in Australia, this council’s decision is likely to have far-reaching implications. For the first time, health practitioners are being formally alerted to the dangers posed by plasmid contamination — a topic that has been heavily suppressed since the #plasmidgate controversy surfaced in early 2023.

Adjuvants in Gardasil vaccine may facilitate plasmids into teenagers

Compounding the controversy is a recent exposé written by investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi. The exposé reveals similar issues with the Gardasil HPV vaccine. The report highlights the FDA’s awareness of residual plasmid DNA in Gardasil, a contamination concern that dates back to 2011. This is an issue that has been blacklisted from vaccine safety discussions in the media and between government regulators.

This DNA contamination is made more dangerous due to the use of adjuvants in vaccines. The adjuvant is added to vaccines to enhance the immune response. One of the most common adjuvants – aluminum salts – technically act as a transfection agent, allowing foreign DNA to enter the cytoplasm of human immune cells, which then circulate throughout the body. The implications of this toxic facilitation are profound; the introduction of lab-derived plasmids into the human body poses significant risks, including the potential for cancer and other genetic diseases.

Antigen levels and body weight/blood volume of vaccine recipient are important factors

COVID-19 vaccines use lipid nanoparticles which facilitate the entry of plasmid DNA into human cells. The Novavax vaccine contains a saponin adjuvant that has similar risks as the lipid nanoparticles. A Hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B), used in newborn babies, contains both aluminum hydroxide and polysorbate 20. These ingredients act as transfection agents, potentially facilitating plasmids into the baby and setting the stage for childhood cancer.

Moreover, a greater quantity of antigen has a greater chance of introducing plasmids into human cells. Conversely, the DNA contamination could have more pronounced effects on babies with a lower blood volume and body weight. The Engerix vaccine (injected into babies) contains 20 micrograms of antigen, whereas the Gardasil HPV vaccine (injected into teenagers) contains 270 micrograms. The dosage of the antigen is important, as well as the blood volume and weight of the person being injected.

The HPV vaccine contains 13 times more foreign proteins and DNA than the Hep B vaccines. Essentially, the HPV vaccines is equivalent to 13 injections of the Hep vaccine, in terms of antigen quantity. Still, the Hep B vaccine is given to infants, not teenagers, and therefore introduces a disproportionate level of contamination to a baby with lower blood volume and body weight. Both vaccines pose serious DNA contamination risks on two different ends of the exposure spectrum.

All vaccines utilize a risky transfection process using adjuvants

Essential to the function of a vaccine is the term “transfection.” This process allows foreign genetic material to enter human cells — a mechanism that typically doesn’t occur naturally. Human cells possess protective barriers that prevent the uptake of foreign nucleic acids. However, laboratory techniques have been developed to bypass these defenses. The main methods of transfection include:

• Mechanical Disruption: Physically puncturing the cell membrane to allow DNA entry
• Chemical Facilitation: Utilizing chemicals that mimic essential cellular components, acting like a Trojan horse to transport DNA into the cell
• Electroporation: Applying an electric field to create temporary pores in the cell membrane, though this method is less practical for widespread human use

Among these, chemical agents are the most viable for introducing nucleic acids into cells. Commonly used transfection agents include cationic particles, which are positively charged and attract the negatively charged components of cell membranes. Detergents can also disrupt membranes, enabling the entry of nucleic acids. The concern surrounding the use of lab-reagent plasmids is significant. These plasmids can contain nucleotides that may lead to severe genetic consequences, including cancer, if transferred into human cells. When a transfection agent is present, the likelihood of this transfer increases substantially.

While many are familiar with standard transfection agents like lipids (lipofectamine, lipid nanoparticles) and calcium phosphate, a broader range of substances can act as transfection agents. Here are some less commonly recognized ones:

• Polysorbate: A surfactant/emulsifier that can enhance transfection
• Metallic Cations: Elements such as aluminum, zirconium, and cerium, known for their positive charge and transfection efficiency
• Saponins: Soaps used as adjuvants in certain vaccines, promoting transfection
• Histidine: A positively charged amino acid that can aid in the transfection process

Understanding the toxicity potential of these transfection agents is crucial, especially in light of their implications for causing cancer in children, teenagers, and adults.

Sources include:

• NaturalNews.com
• ArkMedic.info [1]
• ArkMedic.info [2]
• Blog.MaryAnneDemasi.substack.com
• Public4PageFreezer.com

Geoengineering can be used as a weapon

In recent years, the concept of chemtrails, geoengineering, and weather modification has shifted from the fringes of conspiracy theory into mainstream conversation. With the U.S. government’s revealing its “Five Year Geoengineering Study Plan,” and the USDA’s detailed report on cloud seeding, it is becoming increasingly clear that weather modification is not merely theoretical; it is a reality.

Weather modification (cloud seeding) has been used in the past to increase rainfall totals, and experiments have been conducted to alter the paths of storms. Historically, the U.S. military has used weather modification against foreign enemies. Are current hurricanes influenced by weather modification from corporate, multinational business interests, or perhaps government operations, foreign or domestic? Are forces of evil using weather modification to harm Americans?

The lack of widespread discourse around geoengineering raises alarms. U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and others have voiced concerns over governmental control of weather, calling for increased scrutiny of all entities involved in these weather modification programs.

Cloud seeding has been used for nefarious reasons in the past

Cloud seeding, the most common form of geoengineering, involves releasing substances such as silver iodide and potassium iodide into the atmosphere to encourage precipitation. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) describes the process as one that disrupts natural cloud evolution to artificially create rain. On their website, they detail the nine types of weather modification, which does include ionization and lasers.

As of April, there are 42 operational cloud seeding projects across the U.S., with plans for an additional 200 stations by next season, driven by stakeholders from agriculture to insurance companies seeking to mitigate weather-related losses. The North American Weather Modification Council notes that a variety of entities, including municipal governments and private corporations, engage in cloud seeding. Weather modification can also be used to divert precipitation away from certain areas. One company in England sells pricey cloud seeding services to wealthy couples to ensure they get perfect weather on their wedding day.

Historically, cloud seeding has been used for nefarious purposes, like the U.S. military’s Operation Popeye during the Vietnam War. This covert program aimed to extend monsoon seasons over strategic routes, severely disrupting enemy supply lines through artificially induced flooding. The Pentagon later deemed these operations “outstandingly successful,” despite their collateral damage to civilians and military personnel alike.

An example of geoengineering that had unintended consequences is Project Cirrus in 1947. This geoengineering operation dispersed large amounts of dry ice into the clouds to encourage precipitation. The idea was to stimulate the formation of ice crystals, which could then lead to rain. The project stalled the hurricane temporarily but inadvertently redirected the hurricane into Georgia.

For decades, the federal government has claimed that geoengineering is a conspiracy theory; however, in recent years, the government has come clean about these operations and now promotes them as a way to “combat climate change.” Now that these experiments are out in the open, concerns about safety, ethics and public oversight have arisen.

Prominent environmentalist Robert Kennedy Jr. argues that powerful figures, including Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum, have “hijacked geoengineering” to further agendas that prioritize social control rather than genuine solutions to environmental challenges. “They aggravate the problem then sell us the solution,” Kennedy asserts, highlighting the potential risks of unchecked technological interventions.

Internationally, over 52 countries are actively engaged in weather modification programs, raising concerns about the geopolitical ramifications of such technologies. Nations like China and Russia have developed advanced capabilities for altering weather, potentially using these techniques as tools of hybrid warfare.

For a more detailed look into weather modification over the decades, read the The Gateway Pundit’s latest deep dive into the issue.

Sources include:

• TheGatewayPundit.com
• CleanTechnica.com
• ARS.USDA.gov
• X.com
• Library.NOAA.gov
• NawMC.org
• OliversTravels.com
• Gizmodo.com
• EarthMagazine.org
• Forbes.com
• Brighteon.com

One of the main organizers of the event – Calley Means – urged the Senate to rethink nutritional guidance and distrust almost every institution.

America’s institutions have lied to the public for decades, misleading people on nutrition, healing from chronic illness

Means, a former consultant for Big Food and Big Pharma, emphasized the need for skepticism regarding the advice offered by major institutions on nutrition and chronic diseases. “Life expectancy has not increased in the past century, and we spend 90 to 95% of all medical spending on chronic issues, yet outcomes remain stagnant,” Means stated.

Means highlighted alarming trends, noting, “Heart disease has risen with increased statin prescriptions. Type 2 diabetes has surged alongside metformin use, and ADHD diagnoses have also climbed as more Adderall is prescribed.” He further pointed out that rising rates of depression and suicide correlate with increased prescriptions of antidepressants, while opioid prescriptions have led to greater pain management challenges.

Means criticized the American food system, describing it as “weaponized” due to the influence of the processed food industry. He traced its origins back to the tobacco industry, stating that major cigarette companies strategically acquired food brands and applied their expertise in creating addictive products. “They moved addiction specialists into their food divisions, creating ultra-processed foods designed to be both palatable and addictive,” he explained. Food chemicals such as MSG are used to addict consumers to toxic food-like products that are void of nutrition. Consumers get accustomed to eating ultra-processed foods that do not provide their cells what’s necessary to carry out vital functions.

Means asserted that the standard American diet has not only contributed to public health crises but has also been financially beneficial for the healthcare industry, which profits from treating the chronic conditions stemming from poor nutrition. “The medical industry has been complicit in this issue, benefiting from the rise in chronic diseases,” Means added. It’s true: most of the new drugs manufactured today do not address the root cause of chronic disease. Many of the new drugs actually cause new health problems.

Ultra-processed, food-like items have replaced raw living foods and herbs that people need to thrive

Max Lugavere, a best-selling author and long-time advocate for nutritional awareness, echoed these sentiments. He warned that many items in grocery stores should not be considered food but rather “food-like items” that contribute to an obesity epidemic. “This isn’t just about willpower; it’s about our food system,” Lugavere asserted. He concluded with a poignant observation: “We are not simply living longer; we are dying longer, plagued by preventable illnesses.”

The discussions at the Senate roundtable were deeply distrustful of government guidelines like the USDA’s food pyramid, which ignores essential food groups such as herbs, seeds, roots, barks, berries, seaweeds and healthy fats, to name a few. As health education is dumbed down in school systems and in medical schools, there is growing concern about the effectiveness of current nutritional guidance and chronic disease management strategies. As chronic diseases surface, individuals are finding their own way out of these health struggles by researching and implementing holistic strategies that are dismissed by traditional allopathic doctors — most of which are not trained on nutrition and herbal medicine.

As the panelists called for a re-evaluation of institutional advice, they highlighted the urgent need for systemic change in America’s approach to health and nutrition. Food pantries are void of the raw, living foods, nutrient-dense superfoods, adaptogenic substances and medicinal herbs that can set people free from their chronic diseases.

Sources include:

• Lifesitenews.com
• Rumble.com
• DietaryGuidelines.gov [PDF]
• Naturalpedia.com

The round table, hosted by Senator Ron Johnson, was titled, American Health & Nutrition: A Second Opinion. Those who testified included: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Jordan Peterson, Calley Means, Dr. Chris Palmer, Dr. Marty Makary, Max Lugavere, Dr. Casey Means, Grace Price, Courtney Swan, Alex Clark, Jason Karp, Brigham Buhler, Mikhaila Fuller, Jillian Michaels, and Vani Hari. The coalition testified about their own experiences taking on personal health challenges while confronting medical orthodoxy and the industries that intentionally poison the food supply for profit.

These are serious discussions that will impact the future of children’s health – discussions that should be expanded and acted upon, to ultimately alter the chronic disease epidemic that is currently ravaging the country.

Toxic chemicals are intentionally put in American products to addict consumers and boost corporate profits

One of the speakers – Vani Hari – talked about overcoming her health challenges and questioning the American food supply. Vani has been a clean food activist for over a decade and started her own company offering clean products. In her speech, she called out American food corporations for manufacturing products that are drastically more toxic in America, while selling the same products in Europe, but with far less toxic ingredients.

Vani called out the “unethical policies of American food companies” that insist on selling “safer versions of their products in other countries, while selling our own citizens ingredients that are heavily regulated or banned abroad.”

The American version of these products often contain artificial dyes, BHT and MSG which are linked to endocrine disruption, infertility, neurological dysfunction and cancer. The American products have a longer shelf life because they contain chemical preservatives. The American products are also intentionally designed to be more addictive, but the chemicals used to trick consumers into eating more are toxic and linked to brain damage.

For example, Gatorade Zero Fruit Punch in the U.S. contains caramel color and Red 40, while the German version doesn’t contain either toxin. The alternative versions sold in Europe are colored with natural pigments from fruits and vegetables.

McDonald’s French fries contain 11 ingredients in the United States, but only contain 3 ingredients in the UK. One of the ingredients in the U.S. version is dimethylpolysiloxane, a foaming agent preserved with neurotoxic formaldehyde. By using this foaming agent, McDonald’s workers do not have to change out the cooking oil as often, boosting corporate profits at the expense of consumer health.

Food corporations should be subject to stringent regulations to protect Americans’ health

With these revelations now going mainstream, American food corporations must consider providing Americans with the same products they sell to Europeans. To hold these corporations accountable, LEGISLATION should be written at the federal level, complete with scientific citations documenting the harms that these dyes, flavor chemicals and preservatives cause. This legislation should mandate that American food products be free of brain-damaging, endocrine-disrupting and cancer-causing ingredients.

A database of all the toxic ingredients could readily be compiled, along with a product list that includes these toxic ingredients. Future regulatory pressure should incentivize sweeping changes to the American food supply, providing strict deadlines for food manufacturers to eliminate toxins and reformulate their products. If mass harm can be proven for an individual ingredient, and a corporation refuses to remove it from their products, then they should be prosecuted in a court of law for injuring Americans’ health. A restructured FDA must be equipped to enforce new regulations on an industry that is causing health problems across generations. These actions could help break up monopolies and allow smaller, clean food companies to compete in the marketplace as well.

Sources include:

• Rumble.com
• Foodbabe.com

According to the researchers, the COVID-19 vaccines — which have failed to stimulate a meaningful immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus — have unintended consequences that affect blood integrity. The team’s findings suggest that the vaccines can induce harmful changes in blood, which could pose risks not only to recipients of blood transfusions but also to those receiving organ transplants from vaccinated donors.

Six ways COVID vaccines cause blood damage:

1. The study indicates that spike proteins, which the vaccines are designed to produce, can persist in the blood, and accumulate in various organs. These proteins have been linked to several toxic effects, including damage to red blood cells and platelet aggregation. The researchers recommend that blood products be purified to remove these harmful spike proteins.
2. In some cases, the human immune system does not neutralize the spike proteins that are generated by the COVID-19 vaccines. Spike proteins that are not cleared by the body may lead to the formation of amyloid aggregates and microthrombi, or clusters of abnormal proteins and small blood clots. These aggregates are difficult to eliminate and can cause further health issues. Ensuring the removal of these aggregates from contaminated blood is crucial for patient safety.
3. Repeated vaccinations may impair immune function, resulting in insufficient levels of immunoglobulins (antibodies). Blood donated from heavily-vaccinated individuals may provide inadequate levels of immunity to common infections due to immune imprinting or class switch to IgG4. This could potentially make blood from heavily-vaccinated individuals less effective in fighting infections, cancer, and may pose risks to those with weakened immune systems.
4. The mRNA vaccines use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to deliver genetic material. The study suggests that LNPs and pseudouridinated mRNA may remain in the bloodstream longer than anticipated, which could lead to inflammatory reactions and unintended spike protein synthesis in various body tissues.
5. The presence of aggregated red blood cells or platelets, another side effect of spike proteins, could increase the risk of blood clots and cardiovascular events if not properly addressed before transfusion.
6. Long-term exposure to the vaccine’s spike protein might result in the generation of IgG4 antibodies and memory B cells, which could lead to chronic inflammation and immune dysfunction.

Unvaccinated blood is medically more valuable and should be the only blood used in transfusions

The researchers have called for an immediate review and overhaul of current practices regarding blood donations from vaccinated individuals. Their study highlights the urgent need for specific tests and regulations to address these serious risks.

“The health injuries caused by genetic vaccination are already extremely serious, and it is high time that countries and relevant organizations take concrete steps together to identify the risks and to control and resolve them,” the researchers wrote in their paper.

This research highlights a critical area of concern in the aftermath of the global vaccination experiment against COVID-19. As medical professionals and regulators realize what they have done to the future blood supply, the priority will be to ensure that blood and organ transplant practices are adapted to minimize potential risks and protect vulnerable patients. Unvaccinated blood should be regarded as pure, and be deemed medically more valuable than vaccinated blood. In fact, according to this study, unvaccinated blood should be the only blood used in blood transfusions.

Sources include:

• Expose-News.com
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com
• Preprints.org

The latest Moderna vaccine is now intended for administration in six-month-old babies, with a booster given one month after the first. The Pfizer vaccine is also intended for administration at six months old, with the second dose coming three weeks later, and a third dose no later than eight weeks after the second. These vaccines will be routinely given to babies under 15 months, along with an additional thirty-seven shots, all of which have not been subject to double blind, placebo-controlled studies, nor been safety-tested for cumulative exposure and compounding toxicity.

There is no licensed COVID-19 vaccine for children under 12 but the CDC insists pediatricians push new COVID jabs on babies

It is important to note that as of now, there are no licensed COVID-19 vaccines available for children under 12. The CDC is recommending babies be subject to vaccines that are currently in development and have a track record of causing health problems, instead of preventing them.

The vaccines currently recommended for babies are only authorized under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This status means that these vaccines have not undergone the full licensing process and are subject to a lower standard of evidence compared to licensed products, which have an abysmally low standard of evidence to begin with.

With these recommendations, the CDC appears to be acting in a diabolical manner yet again. The newer versions of the COVID-19 vaccines have not demonstrated safety and efficacy beyond what earlier versions showed. The entire vaccine experiment on humanity is spiraling out of control, yet the beleaguered federal agencies refuse to halt this predatory machine that sacrifices human health for pharmaceutical profits.

Of course, the government promotes COVID vaccines as “safe and effective” for babies, just like the rest of the childhood vaccines

Albert Benavides, an analyst of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), has raised alarms about the reporting and transparency of vaccine-related adverse events. VAERS has recorded over 37,000 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination, though many of these reports have vague details about age and the precise nature of the adverse events. Benavides suggests that these figures are being under-reported.

Despite the evidence of mass harm, the CDC continues to assert that the COVID-19 vaccines are “safe and effective.” Still promoting dangerous and potentially life-threatening propaganda, the agency emphasizes that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of COVID-19, particularly in preventing severe disease and complications.

Subversively, the communication strategy for promoting EUA vaccines differs from licensed vaccines. For EUA products, fact sheets provided by the vaccine manufacturers detail the risks and benefits, but these are not required to be shared with patients in the same way that Vaccine Information Statements (VIS) are required for licensed vaccines. For EUA COVID-19 vaccines, the CDC directs people to “fact sheets” that are produced by the vaccine manufacturer, with no third-party holding the manufacturer accountable and no objective analysis of the risks and the lack of benefits.

Pfizer’s own fact sheet for its COVID-19 vaccine acknowledges that EUA products have not undergone the same rigorous review as FDA-approved products. After experimenting with these products on the population, and being forced by the courts to turn over initial risk data, Pfizer and the FDA has begrudgingly admitted on those fact sheets that side effects such as myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported. This is a serious risk. In Japan’s pharmacovigilance system, fatality rates for myocarditis and pericarditis can be as high as 9.6%.

Whether its an EUA product or fully-licensed product, the CDC always propagates the messaging put forth by the vaccine manufacturer. For instance, the first statement on the CDC’s “6 Things to Know about COVID-19 Vaccination for Children” says, “COVID-19 vaccination for children is safe.” This blatant lie should call into question every vaccine on the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule. Why haven’t these childhood vaccines – a list of injections that continues to grow out of control – been subject to double-blind, placebo-controlled studies?

In a way, the COVID-19 vaccine fraud has broken open a dam of lies, causing more parents around the country to question a system that is deceiving and harming the public, and as many are finding out, has pushed lies and false guilt on parents for years.

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• CDC.gov
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com
• ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Now these same monstrous, totalitarian Democrats are erecting voting initiatives inside the medical system to push patients into complying with the Democrat’s sordid political agendas.

Democrat Party elite are manipulating healthcare systems, coercing patients to vote Blue

Vot-ER, a nonprofit organization, is spearheading an effort to integrate voter registration into medical settings, utilizing physicians to encourage certain patient demographics to register and vote. This approach, described by Democrats as a means of empowering patients, has drawn criticism for its political bias and its impact on the healthcare system.

At the core of Vot-ER’s approach is a system that outfits physicians with badges that feature QR codes. When patients scan these codes with their smartphones, they are directed to a website where they can register to vote. According to Vot-ER, this integration of voting into healthcare is intended to act as a form of “therapeutic treatment,” which “enhances patient empowerment and recovery.” For example, Dr. Julie Graziane from the Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute asserts that voter registration serves as a “therapeutic tool” and is integral to the recovery process.

Vot-ER’s founder, Dr. Alister Martin, suggested to a patient that voting was the “only way” to address air pollution, a remark that reflects the organization’s belief in voting as a solution to solve various societal issues. The patient is then manipulated to believe that Democrats are the only ones who will address air pollution, even though the party’s current environmental plan centers around climate change hysteria, and doesn’t address any real pollutants.

Despite its claims of non-partisanship, Vot-ER’s connections to left-leaning politics are evident. In fact, this whole system is funded by Democratic Party donors. Dr. Martin, for instance, is a known donor to Democratic causes and has served as an adviser to Vice President Kamala Harris.

The organization’s leadership includes figures like Aliya Bhatia, who is a donor to Democratic politicians including Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Another big donor, Leah Ford, previously received recognition from Planned Parenthood and identifies with gender pronouns. The infiltration of medical offices with forms that require “preferred gender pronouns” is another way that the Democratic Party asserts itself as “inclusive” and manipulates patients into accepting delusional Democratic ideals.

Vot-ER’s funding sources also raise serious questions about the future of left-wing politics infiltrating healthcare and abusing vulnerable patients. Doctors are subconsciously trained to get patients to vote for issues that, allegedly, only Democrats care about. Vot-ER is backed by dark money groups and progressive foundations such as the Tides Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and George Soros’ Open Society Foundations. These affiliations suggest a significant financial and ideological alignment with progressive causes, vaccine mandates and other forms of ideological and physical oppression marketed as “science.”

Vot-ER system targets patients who are more likely to succumb to Democratic Party lies

Vot-ER’s tools have been adopted in a wide range of medical settings, including emergency rooms, psychiatric hospitals and substance abuse clinics, spanning approximately 89,000 patients. The application process for institutions to use Vot-ER’s tools involves questions about the patient demographics they serve and their commitment to diversity and inclusion, including their commitment to the LGBTQIA+ community. This criterion ensures that Vot-ER’s resources are utilized in environments that align with its target voter groups.

The organization specifically targets minorities, with a notable focus on clinics serving predominantly Black, Hispanic, LGBTQIA+ and younger populations under age 24. The goal is to make these demographics feel left behind by Republicans and conservatives, while motivating them to scan the QR code and go vote Blue. In these situations, Democrat operatives promise to be the savior of pandemics and climate change, while painting the Republicans as not caring about any “health-related matters.”

By focusing on demographics that lean heavily Democratic, this system remains biased, deceptive and in breach of medical ethics. Pushing left-wing politics and political bias into patient care, especially on patients who may not be mentally or physically stable, is a predatory act against a patient’s conscience. These politically-biased schemes should be legislated against and eliminated from healthcare.

Sources include:

• TheGoldReport.com
• X.com

Dr. Joseph Hickey, Ph.D., president of Correlation and co-author of the study, discussed these startling results on “The Defender In-Depth.” According to the research — which evaluated mortality data from 2015 to 2023 — patterns of excess death do not align with the spread of the virus or long COVID but instead correlate closely with government-imposed restrictions and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines!

Bio-terror, isolation, biological stress and compliance with restrictions caused 30 million global deaths

Hickey and his team used the “P-score” methodology to adjust for variables like age and health status. Their analysis revealed a significant correlation between excess mortality and socioeconomic factors such as poverty. They argue that the restrictive measures — particularly lockdowns — exacerbated biological stress, adversely affecting the most vulnerable populations. That biological stress includes mandating the isolation of mildly ill individuals and putting them on sedatives and ventilators. Biological stress also includes the intentional harms caused by vaccine mandates and lockdowns that destroyed people’s careers and ability to eat.

The study revealed that pandemic-related restrictions are linked to an estimated 30 million global deaths, while the COVID-19 vaccines are associated with 17 million deaths. Hickey and his team argue that these findings suggest the pandemic declaration and subsequent isolation measures had a far more significant impact on global mortality than some virus construct. Living in perpetual fear, isolation and constant stress due to government tyranny and societal upheaval has far reaching mental and physical health effects that lead to death and worse outcomes in the face of chronic and infectious disease.

Hickey reiterated that the data does not support the theory of a particularly virulent pathogen that remained characteristically dangerous for months and years. Instead, the findings point to totalitarian national policies, medical fraud and hysterical public health measures as the main drivers of excess deaths over time. The study challenges the assumption that the virus was the primary cause of increased mortality, suggesting that the impact of political and public health interventions, including lockdowns and vaccine mandates, are more detrimental.

Democide and vaccine mandates caused excess deaths, not a pandemic

The research highlights that the observed excess mortality rates during the pandemic were not uniform. Some countries saw sharp spikes in excess deaths coinciding with the implementation of restrictions or the initiation of vaccine roll-outs. In stark contrast, other nations experienced no excess mortality until vaccines were introduced. In fact, countries with higher vaccine uptake experienced persistent excess deaths into 2023. Hickey pointed to potential issues with the vaccine, like vaccine-related immunosuppression and adverse reactions. Instead of addressing these serious public health issues, further booster doses were recommended, with no beneficial impact on society. Australia, for one, saw an abnormal spike in all-cause mortality at the same time they mandated a COVID-19 booster vaccine. Now there is a class action lawsuit to fight back.

The world suffered, not from a pandemic, but from a DEMOCIDE that was fueled by medical fraud, bio-terror propaganda, germaphobia psychological programming, mass hysteria and compliance, vaccine worship, and a lack of knowledge on how immune systems work and what can be done to treat people for disease, or treat people humanely for that matter. The COVID-19 scandal exposed the corruption in the medical and pharmaceutical industry and elucidated the proclivity of modern governments to act maliciously against individuals, with no remorse.

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• Correlation-Canada.org [PDF]
• NaturalNews.com
• CovidVaxClassAction.com.au
• NaturalNews.com