Although one should take GREAT EXCEPTION to Ackman’s phrase:

“currently accepted science . . .”

When falsified papers are churned out, underwritten by NIH/NIAID and the NSF, etc., one could hardly describe Fake Science in such a farfetched manner! Many involved with once reputable science journals have long since complained about the prevailing Fake Science of today!

Haven’t read a stanrdard hospital/clinic medical journal in ages, but recall there were always sections at the end with public announcememts on what resesrchers and academics had been officially CENSURED, or placed on PROBATION for suggestions or evidence of falsifying data — and included Harvard and Stanford as well.

Many meta–analyses studies are are based on hospital and clinic records, yet when patients exit these places they DO NOT sign off on their medical records so they have no idea if they were falsified as possible malpractice countermeasures —- a rather common practice today, I am sorry to say!?

Ergo, that in of itself invalidates many studies to begin with!!!