Let’s instead speak of individualism and the influence of right or wrong behavior. Collectivist mentality wages a war upon individualism, our busy lives, laziness abhors the rigor of individualism. The effect of both collectivism and individualism is motivation behind the divide we experience.

There are hero’s and monsters in both forms of thought. This is imo where morality modulates between the two extremes. Point in fact monsters became hero’s for being in the right place at the right time, the opposite is also true, many have lived and continue to live lives in polar opposite of these labels.

The unique character each of us possess is formed generally in the crucible of youth, was morality present, the environment and those in daily contact. Many are turned on their natural inclinations and accept or reject morality based upon the interactions of the environment they exist and those whom travel through with them.

The point is no path is certain to produce good or bad character. Collectivist mentality doesn’t necessarily reject the notion of morality but it does recognize morality in some forms acts as a bulwark against reform. Again reform is another subject but if reform is a driving force obstacles such as morality must be navigated around or through. Character is molded as noted by influence and experience. While no perfect plan exists to produce a desirable form of character collectivist pressure tends to suppress morality as a means to a goal.

Individualistic character naturally resists the collective influence. It sets them free to choose. In society there exists pools of those inclined to individualism and collectivism. Individualistic behavior can be chaotic, uncontrollable again good or bad but markedly difficult to those inclined to either aspect of behavior so a study of this pool produces little knowledge regarding a renegade within the pool. A collectivist pool in contrast can highlight even celebrate those who reject its influence. As an example the black community in America has always had from its introduction in America forced or contrived collectivist mentality. Politicians exploit it. Those in this pool who have rejected its influence are readily recognizable in daily life as successful, or detested based upon how they have channeled their individualism.

Our society is under attack, a conservative wants to protect the status quo while progressives want wholesale change, not slight change or tweaks but radical unraveling. It appears that conservatism is not in ascendency. Can this be changed, who will be our Pericles, where are our orators?

To the earlier post that America will never be disarmed I’m reminded of President Trumps boast that America will never be Socialist. It can and in fact is.

Just another Dhimmeroid “LOOK! Squirrel!” moment to keep the sheeple from realizing that an inanimate object cannot act on its own and that most of the shootings are the 13%.