Confidential Pfizer documents leaked by Project Veritas show that Big Pharma had “evidence that suggests patients who received a (COVID-19) vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”

Meanwhile, heavily redacted CDC documents obtained by the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request indicate that the agency provided an undercounted figure of post-COVID-19 vaccination myocarditis cases to Israel’s Ministry of Health in early 2021.

The latest revelations come as Germany, Japan and other governments are raising questions about the significant numbers of severe adverse events recorded in individuals following the administration of the vaccines.

“This study clearly shows that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine provides almost no benefit to children and adolescents, but does increase their risk of myocarditis and pericarditis,” said Dr. Brian Hooker, CHD’s chief scientific officer. “It begs the question: Why does the CDC continue to recommend these unlicensed shots for kids? Where is the data they use to support their statement that the benefits of these vaccines outweigh the risks?”

The Pfizer vaccine provided children and teens in England with only about 14 to 15 weeks of protection against the virus, as per a preprint study of over 1.7 million children ages five to 15.

Moreover, researchers investigating the safety and effectiveness of Pfizer’s vaccine in fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated children and teens, also found cases of myocarditis and pericarditis only in vaccinated children. The study found that vaccinated children required slightly fewer emergency room visits and hospital stays, but that those outcomes were extremely rare in children and teens across all groups.

COVID-19 vaccine provides almost no benefit to children, study reveals

Public health agencies in the United Kingdom and the U.S. granted authorization to the Pfizer vaccines based on clinical trials that measured immunogenicity and efficacy against infection.

Their research confirmed that even in 2021, when the vaccine was first authorized for children and teens, that age group did not face a high risk for COVID-19-related serious outcomes, including death or the need for emergency care, hospitalization or critical care.

The researchers tested the effectiveness of the first vaccine dose versus no vaccine and of two doses versus a single dose. They matched each vaccinated child with an unvaccinated one, and participants were matched by age, sex, region, prior COVID-19 testing and childhood vaccination status.

Of the 1,262,784 children in the adolescent part of the study, vaccinated and unvaccinated, there were only 72 emergency room visits, 90 COVID-19 hospitalizations and no deaths. There were nine cases of pericarditis and three cases of myocarditis, all in the vaccinated group.

Among all of the children in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated group, there were no emergency visits, only six hospitalizations and no deaths related to COVID-19. There were three cases of pericarditis, all in vaccinated children.

The researchers concluded that in adolescents, the vaccine reduced the rate of hospitalization more than it increased the risk for myocarditis and pericarditis, but for children, the increased risk of pericarditis was higher than the reduction of risk for hospitalization.

Visit VaccineInjury.news for similar stories. Watch this video featuring a discussion on COVID accountability. This video is from the Sanivan channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• Brighteon.com

Dr. Sabine Hazan discovered that Covid-19 mRNA gene therapy injections kill 90% of good gut flora called bifidobacteria, catapulting most major diseases and disorders

The key component that makes up 90% of our biological seat of immunity for fighting diseases is KILLED OFF by spike proteins from mRNA jabs that travel to the gut. Anyone who got Covid vaccinated could be catapulting cancer, IBS, autism, dementia and catching Covid or the next pandemic of Bird Flu, Monkeypox, or whatever other gain-of-function lab-made virus Big Pharma releases into the wild.

Gastroenterologist Dr. Sabine Hazan tested the microbiomes of doctors who volunteered to be tested BEFORE and AFTER getting Covid vaccinated with spike protein prion creating mRNA jabs and discovered that their most important gut bacteria were wiped out within 30 days to almost non-existent. What’s worse is that bifidobacteria remained decimated for 60 days, 90 days, even up to six months.

She then tested newborn babies, whose mothers were injected before their birth with Covid jabs, and the babies had ZERO bifidobacteria (good gut flora) microbes after 90 days and they stayed at zero nine months later. Let that sink in. These newborns have next-to-zero immunity during their first year of life due to the Covid vaccine.

Dr. Hazan had applied for grants and loans to do this research, but of course, no way was Big Pharma, the FDA or the CDC going to help her do this kind of research that exposes the vaccine industry and Covid jabs for what they really are – biological weapons of mass destruction and genocide.

We’re not just talking about autism caused by Covid jabs, but cancer, dementia, neurological disorders, severe allergic reaction and heart complications

The problem is compounded for people who contracted Covid, which means the virus and the mRNA jabs both destroy vital and beneficial gut bacteria. Dr. Hazan said, “I kept collecting stool samples of patients and noticed that patients with severe covid had a certain bacteria that was missing compared to people that were highly exposed to covid, but never got covid. That bacteria is called bifidobacteria. Bifidobacteria is an important and key microbe for immunity. It represents your trillion-dollar industry of probiotics.”

Dr. Hazan also explained the mystery of why babies and young children were not catching Covid, and if they did, they were not at risk of getting a severe case of it or dying. She said that bifidobacteria is present in newborns, but it’s absent in elderly people as just part of the process of ageing. See where this is heading? Covid and the jabs are part of the population reduction agenda of the globalists who funded gain-of-function and instructed scientists to create “vaccines” that did further damage to the biological seat of immunity for all humans infected and/or injected.

It took Dr. Hazan eight months to publish this research paper entitled ‘The lost microbes of Covid-19’. She also wrote about how vitamin C increases bifidobacteria. In conclusion, the loss of bifidobacteria is a catapult for humans contracting, developing and suffering from a whole host of diseases and disorders, most of which would be prevented by simply boosting good gut bacteria with probiotics, eating clean healthy food, and avoiding the deadly Covid jabs at all costs.

Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on Long-Vax-Syndrome that’s catapulting disease and disorder by destroying vital bifidobacteria in the gut.

Sources for this article include:

• Pandemic.news
• Expose-news.com
• NaturalNews.com
• RonJohnson.senate.gov

According to the researchers, the COVID-19 vaccines — which have failed to stimulate a meaningful immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus — have unintended consequences that affect blood integrity. The team’s findings suggest that the vaccines can induce harmful changes in blood, which could pose risks not only to recipients of blood transfusions but also to those receiving organ transplants from vaccinated donors.

Six ways COVID vaccines cause blood damage:

1. The study indicates that spike proteins, which the vaccines are designed to produce, can persist in the blood, and accumulate in various organs. These proteins have been linked to several toxic effects, including damage to red blood cells and platelet aggregation. The researchers recommend that blood products be purified to remove these harmful spike proteins.
2. In some cases, the human immune system does not neutralize the spike proteins that are generated by the COVID-19 vaccines. Spike proteins that are not cleared by the body may lead to the formation of amyloid aggregates and microthrombi, or clusters of abnormal proteins and small blood clots. These aggregates are difficult to eliminate and can cause further health issues. Ensuring the removal of these aggregates from contaminated blood is crucial for patient safety.
3. Repeated vaccinations may impair immune function, resulting in insufficient levels of immunoglobulins (antibodies). Blood donated from heavily-vaccinated individuals may provide inadequate levels of immunity to common infections due to immune imprinting or class switch to IgG4. This could potentially make blood from heavily-vaccinated individuals less effective in fighting infections, cancer, and may pose risks to those with weakened immune systems.
4. The mRNA vaccines use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to deliver genetic material. The study suggests that LNPs and pseudouridinated mRNA may remain in the bloodstream longer than anticipated, which could lead to inflammatory reactions and unintended spike protein synthesis in various body tissues.
5. The presence of aggregated red blood cells or platelets, another side effect of spike proteins, could increase the risk of blood clots and cardiovascular events if not properly addressed before transfusion.
6. Long-term exposure to the vaccine’s spike protein might result in the generation of IgG4 antibodies and memory B cells, which could lead to chronic inflammation and immune dysfunction.

Unvaccinated blood is medically more valuable and should be the only blood used in transfusions

The researchers have called for an immediate review and overhaul of current practices regarding blood donations from vaccinated individuals. Their study highlights the urgent need for specific tests and regulations to address these serious risks.

“The health injuries caused by genetic vaccination are already extremely serious, and it is high time that countries and relevant organizations take concrete steps together to identify the risks and to control and resolve them,” the researchers wrote in their paper.

This research highlights a critical area of concern in the aftermath of the global vaccination experiment against COVID-19. As medical professionals and regulators realize what they have done to the future blood supply, the priority will be to ensure that blood and organ transplant practices are adapted to minimize potential risks and protect vulnerable patients. Unvaccinated blood should be regarded as pure, and be deemed medically more valuable than vaccinated blood. In fact, according to this study, unvaccinated blood should be the only blood used in blood transfusions.

Sources include:

• Expose-News.com
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com
• Preprints.org

In the scorching summer of 2021, a momentous decision swept across Europe, sparking a whirlwind of emotions among parents, who had fallen for the 24/7 propaganda, eagerly awaiting a ray of hope for their children.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) had finally granted emergency use approval for the use of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in children aged 12 to 15.

Relief and elation surged through the hearts of countless naive parents who saw this as a beacon of protection against the alleged pandemic.

Yet, the winds of fortune took an unexpected turn as the vaccine rollout for children commenced. Startling reports emerged, revealing a distressing surge in excess deaths among the young ones across the continent. The sense of optimism quickly faded among the thousands of families affected and was replaced by a grim reality that cast a shadow over the hopes of many.

Tragically, the statistics paint a haunting picture, with a staggering 362% surge in excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 by the thirty-fourth week of 2024. These numbers whisper a chilling tale of consequences that were foreseen by many silenced and heavily censored voices.

Back in 2020, as the establishment desperately sought to fast-track the use of mRNA technology disguised as a vaccine against the alleged pandemic, COVID-19 injections were still in the embryonic stages of development, treading a precarious path toward regulatory approval.

To hasten their availability, regulatory agencies like the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) invoked emergency use authorizations (EUAs), granting a temporary lifeline to these novel and dangerous vaccines.

These EUAs acted as regulatory mechanisms, permitting the usage of medical products in dire circumstances, such as a pandemic, even before they completed the rigorous journey of full regulatory approval.

It was an unprecedented measure taken in the face of an unprecedented crisis. But the alleged COVID-19 pandemic has proven to not be a threat to children, making future decisions by these regulatory bodies extremely questionable and possibly criminal.

One crucial reason why mRNA vaccines had not been widely employed in the general population until December 2020 was the specter of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE).

This phenomenon haunted the corridors of scientific discourse, raising concerns that vaccination with mRNA vaccines could potentially exacerbate the disease, rendering those inoculated more susceptible to its clutches.

History had already witnessed a chilling episode of ADE during the development of a dengue fever vaccine. Initial trials indicated promise, displaying protection against the virus for those unscathed by prior infections.

Sadly, in individuals who had encountered a different strain of the virus before, the vaccine seemed to amplify the risk of severe illness, a grim testament to the treacherous nature of ADE.

Similar tales emerged from numerous animal studies, where potential “vaccines” instigated lung inflammation and other adverse effects upon subsequent exposure to the virus. The vaccine-induced immune response, rather than neutralizing the virus, wrought havoc on lung tissue, leaving a trail of unintended consequences.

Additionally, the ominous specter of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED) loomed large during respiratory virus vaccine trials, including those against coronaviruses.

For instance, trials for a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine illuminated a disconcerting pattern: vaccinated infants faced an increased risk of hospitalization and more severe respiratory illness upon encountering the virus.

The immune response triggered by the vaccine, rather than safeguarding against the virus, seemed to trigger an overreaction of the immune system, exacerbating the disease’s symptoms.

Respiratory viruses, such as coronaviruses and RSV, had long been recognized as grave threats to vulnerable populations, especially infants and the elderly.

However, the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus, supposedly responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, appeared to spare the younger generation, raising perplexing questions about the extension of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Covid-19 vaccinations to children.

The absence of an imminent threat to children further muddled the decision-making process.

The ultimate goal couldn’t have been containment, as real-world data revealed an ironic twist: the Covid-19 vaccinated population seemed to exhibit a higher likelihood of infection and transmission compared to their unvaccinated counterparts. The very shield intended to protect against the virus appeared to falter in its mission.

The eye-opening chart, encompassing the period from January 3rd to March 27th, 2022, unveiled the total number of Covid-19 cases categorized by vaccination status and age group in England. The data, extracted from the the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Week 5, (page 43), Week 9 (page 41) and Week 13 (page 41) Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance reports , painted a vivid picture of the disconcerting reality.

Similarly, another revealing chart illuminated the case rates per 100,000 people, again segregated by vaccination status and age group in England. The alarming disparity emerged: case rates soared among the triple-vaccinated population in every age group, leaving a gaping chasm between them and the unvaccinated.

The divide only grew wider as time passed.

The numbers spoke volumes, revealing that the Covid-19 vaccine recipients faced a higher risk of infection compared to the unvaccinated populace. The evidence begged for a closer examination.

But that examination has still not happened, and sadly, in a recent analysis, EuroMOMO, an organization entrusted with official statistical data from European countries, published data that revealed a disheartening correlation between the approval of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for children and a surge in excess deaths among the young ones.

The data, collected from 26 participating countries across Europe (not including Ukraine) paints a grim picture that simply cannot be ignored.

The chilling figures, extending up to the 34th week of 2024, will most definitely capture the attention of concerned minds.

It is also worth noting that the data only covers 26 out of the 44 countries in Europe, excluding Ukraine. Meaning any claims attributing the findings to the ongoing war can be dismissed immediately.

During week 21 of 2021, the European Medicines Agency extended the emergency use authorization of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, first to children aged 12 to 15 and later to the age group of 5 to 11.

However, the weeks following the approval witnessed a shocking rise in excess deaths among children, an upward trend that persisted unabated.

Between week 21 of 2021 and week 52 of 2021, an alarming tally of 310 excess deaths among 0 to 14-year-old children should have sent shockwaves through the continent. But the data was suppressed.

The contrast couldn’t have been starker, as the period between week 1 and week 21 of 2021 saw 515 fewer deaths than expected.

And the fact the surge in excess deaths aligns perfectly with the EMA’s approval of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 12 to 15 cannot be merely dismissed as coincidence.

The distressing trend continued throughout 2022, with a total of 1,639 excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 across the 26 European countries, painting a grim reality that cannot be dismissed.

Thankfully, 2023 was slightly better with 138 excess deaths recorded among children.

But sadly, we have again seen a huge increase in 2024 with 442 excess deaths recorded among children across Europe as of week 34 of 2024.

The somber figures speak of an unprecedented 335%/42x surge in excess deaths since the European Medicines Agency extended emergency use authorization of the Covid-19 vaccine to children aged 12 to 15.

The contrast with the previous period couldn’t be starker.

From week 44 of 2018 to week 21 of 2021, 735 fewer deaths occurred among children aged 0 to 14 than expected.

The staggering increase in excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 across 26 European countries, including the UK, France, Spain, Italy, and Germany, paints a bleak picture of an astounding 335% surge since the European Medicines Agency extended emergency use authorization of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine to children aged 12 to 15.

This distressing reality raises serious concerns, considering the experimental nature of the injections and its previous avoidance due to the risks of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED).

Moreover, administering the vaccine to children, who were not at significant risk from the alleged Covid-19 virus, seems perplexing in light of the 873 fewer deaths recorded among children aged 0 to 14 across Europe in 2020, from the onset of the alleged pandemic to the year’s end.

In a Substack newsletter, Dr. William Makis cited a paper from 2020 (by Juarez et al) on the antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically feasible concentrations where it was found to support its clinical development as a repositioned cancer drug.

According to the study, at a human dose of two mg/kg, ivermectin can achieve anti-cancer effects such as cell cycle arrest (inhibit proliferation), preferential inhibition of cancer stem-like cells, synergize with several chemotherapy drugs and inhibit tumor growth in a breast cancer mouse model.

Ivermectin was tested at two mg/kg/day, translating to roughly 5uM in vitro concentration. They found that the drug goes after cancer stem cells, which tend to be resistant to chemotherapy.

“Ivermectin has a preferential depletion effect on the cancer stem-like cell population,” the authors included in the research. “We observed that among all the evaluated cell lines, a decrease in cell viability and clonogenicity is more evident in the cancer stem-like cells than in their parental population.”

It also found that the most sensitive cancer cell lines were the ovarian, breast, glioblastoma (brain), lung, colon, uterine squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), hepatocellular, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), pancreatic and endometrial.

Meanwhile, the least sensitive were osteosarcoma, gastric and melanoma.

Moreover, lymphoma and leukemia cell lines appear to be more resistant to Ivermectin but the drug has a significant impact on those cells’ ability to form colonies, according to the study. (Related: Ivermectin can “kill cancer cells” and boost immune response, suggest health experts.)

Makis further highlighted that this was the first study he had ever seen that had tested as many as 28 cancer types with ivermectin.

“No wonder it’s hidden from the public,” he commented.

NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN Tested against 28 types of Cancer – which cancers were most sensitive to Ivermectin? Which were least sensitive?

A research group from Mexico investigated Ivermectin in Cancer

Paper: 2020 (Juarez et al) – Antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically… pic.twitter.com/xWhgEBa1uv

— William Makis MD (@MakisMD) August 26, 2024

FDA took down social media posts discouraging ivermectin use for COVID-19 but mainstream media seemed to have missed this

Back in March, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agreed to permanently take down its social media posts urging people to avoid the usage of ivermectin for COVID-19.

One of the pages that the agency has removed was a page that said: “Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? No.” It also took down posts, including one that reads: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

The move was done following a lawsuit with a settlement filed with a federal court in Texas that ordered the agency to delete another page titled “Why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19 within 21 days.”

The article said that ivermectin was neither authorized nor approved to be used to prevent or treat COVID-19 in humans or animals. It also claims that evidence does not support the efficacy of ivermectin against coronavirus.

On June 2, 2022, Doctors Paul Marik, Mary Talley Bowden and Robert Apter filed a lawsuit against the FDA and its secretary Robert Califf, as well as the Department of Health and Human Services and its secretary Xavier Becerra. They accused the FDA of meddling with their capacity to practice medicine. The lawsuit was first turned down on the basis that the FDA has “sovereign immunity.” However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overruled the lower court’s ruling, stating that the “FDA is not a physician” and “even tweet-sized doses of personalized medical advice are beyond the FDA’s statutory authority.”

Ivermectin has long been approved for use in both animals and humans. In cases of humans, the drug is recommended to treat parasitic infections such as river blindness disease, threadworm infestation, tropical eosinophilia, roundworm infestation, whipworm infestation, filariasis (also called elephantiasis) and loiasis.

On X, formerly Twitter, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden wrote: “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”

Moreover, independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr in a tweet said: “The FDA is biased against many low-cost, generic, and/or natural therapies with low-profit potential. Could it be because half its funding comes from Big Pharma?”

Ivermectin is not an exceptional case. The FDA is biased against many low-cost, generic, and/or natural therapies with low profit potential. Could it be because half its funding comes from Big Pharma? https://t.co/LxpqLuvb6A

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) March 22, 2024

Australian politician Craig Kelly also called the FDA “corrupt,” stating that they have “blood on their hands.”

Head over to Cancer.news for more stories, similar to this.

Sources for this article include:

• Makismd.substack.com
• HindustanTimes.com

Dr. Joseph Hickey, Ph.D., president of Correlation and co-author of the study, discussed these startling results on “The Defender In-Depth.” According to the research — which evaluated mortality data from 2015 to 2023 — patterns of excess death do not align with the spread of the virus or long COVID but instead correlate closely with government-imposed restrictions and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines!

Bio-terror, isolation, biological stress and compliance with restrictions caused 30 million global deaths

Hickey and his team used the “P-score” methodology to adjust for variables like age and health status. Their analysis revealed a significant correlation between excess mortality and socioeconomic factors such as poverty. They argue that the restrictive measures — particularly lockdowns — exacerbated biological stress, adversely affecting the most vulnerable populations. That biological stress includes mandating the isolation of mildly ill individuals and putting them on sedatives and ventilators. Biological stress also includes the intentional harms caused by vaccine mandates and lockdowns that destroyed people’s careers and ability to eat.

The study revealed that pandemic-related restrictions are linked to an estimated 30 million global deaths, while the COVID-19 vaccines are associated with 17 million deaths. Hickey and his team argue that these findings suggest the pandemic declaration and subsequent isolation measures had a far more significant impact on global mortality than some virus construct. Living in perpetual fear, isolation and constant stress due to government tyranny and societal upheaval has far reaching mental and physical health effects that lead to death and worse outcomes in the face of chronic and infectious disease.

Hickey reiterated that the data does not support the theory of a particularly virulent pathogen that remained characteristically dangerous for months and years. Instead, the findings point to totalitarian national policies, medical fraud and hysterical public health measures as the main drivers of excess deaths over time. The study challenges the assumption that the virus was the primary cause of increased mortality, suggesting that the impact of political and public health interventions, including lockdowns and vaccine mandates, are more detrimental.

Democide and vaccine mandates caused excess deaths, not a pandemic

The research highlights that the observed excess mortality rates during the pandemic were not uniform. Some countries saw sharp spikes in excess deaths coinciding with the implementation of restrictions or the initiation of vaccine roll-outs. In stark contrast, other nations experienced no excess mortality until vaccines were introduced. In fact, countries with higher vaccine uptake experienced persistent excess deaths into 2023. Hickey pointed to potential issues with the vaccine, like vaccine-related immunosuppression and adverse reactions. Instead of addressing these serious public health issues, further booster doses were recommended, with no beneficial impact on society. Australia, for one, saw an abnormal spike in all-cause mortality at the same time they mandated a COVID-19 booster vaccine. Now there is a class action lawsuit to fight back.

The world suffered, not from a pandemic, but from a DEMOCIDE that was fueled by medical fraud, bio-terror propaganda, germaphobia psychological programming, mass hysteria and compliance, vaccine worship, and a lack of knowledge on how immune systems work and what can be done to treat people for disease, or treat people humanely for that matter. The COVID-19 scandal exposed the corruption in the medical and pharmaceutical industry and elucidated the proclivity of modern governments to act maliciously against individuals, with no remorse.

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• Correlation-Canada.org [PDF]
• NaturalNews.com
• CovidVaxClassAction.com.au
• NaturalNews.com

(Mercola)—Three years since the first mRNA COVID-19 injections were released, the world is finally becoming aware of the dangers of getting them. Thanks to the committed efforts of many individuals fighting for the truth, it seems that — in the words of Dr. Meryl Nass — “the dam has broken.”¹

The Effectiveness of the Jabs Is Put Into Question

In a study² published in Frontiers in Immunology, researchers from the hospital of Ohio State University sought to find out if the COVID injections actually improved the outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. From March 2020 to November 2022, 152 adult patients were selected — 112 of them tested positive for COVID-19, while the rest didn’t. Furthermore, 23 of those who tested positive for COVID-19 were jabbed while the remaining 89 weren’t.

What they discovered was a startling difference between those who got the shots and those who didn’t. Mortality for the non-infected population was 36% and 27% among non-jabbed and injected groups respectively. But for the infected population, the non-jabbed subset had a mortality rate of 37% while the injected subset had a shocking 70% mortality rate.

Going deeper into the participants’ backgrounds, researchers investigated the possible influence of comorbidities using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), a widely used analytical tool to determine the survival rate of patients with multiple comorbidities.³ They discovered that the CCI score was significantly higher in jabbed versus unjabbed patients. The researchers noted:⁴

“Comorbidities and age are the known contributors to increased mortality among COVID-19 patients. Nonetheless, in our study, mortality remained significantly higher in the Vax patients even after adjustment for CCI, suggesting there are other risk factors in vaccinated patients.”

The researchers also investigated the antibodies between the two populations. Interestingly, they discovered that the unjabbed subset had significantly higher antibody titers compared to those who got the shots. This discovery suggests the possible role of natural immunity in the protection against severe COVID-19.

Furthermore, the researchers suggest that getting the shot can lead to immune tolerance — a process that makes your immune system less likely to respond to antigens, such as SARS-CoV-2.⁵

Mainstream Media Now Reporting Shots Contributed to Excess Deaths

The alarming rise in excess mortality cannot be ignored anymore. It’s reached a tipping point, so much so that mainstream media is even covering this topic. On June 5, 2024, The Telegraph published a front-page headline that doesn’t mince words — “COVID Vaccines May Have Helped Fuel Rise in Excess Deaths.”⁶

The article discusses a study published in BMJ Public Health on June 3, 2024, which looked at the excess mortality rates across 47 countries in the Western world from 2020 to 2022. To contextualize the findings, here’s the definition of excess mortality, according to the researchers:⁷

“Excess mortality is assessed as the deviation between the reported number of deaths in a country during a certain week or month in 2020 until 2022 and the expected or projected number of deaths in a country for that period under normal conditions.”

The researchers analyzed the records found in the “Our World in Data.” It’s an open-access database, which includes reports from the World Mortality Dataset and the Human Mortality Database.⁸ According to their findings, 87% of the countries included in the study reported a total excess mortality rate of 1,033,122 deaths during 2020.⁹

In 2021, that figure jumped to 1,256,942 excess deaths. This is an eye-opener, since this was the year in which lockdowns were implemented and the newly released mRNA shots were promoted to ostensibly contain the spread of the pandemic. As you can see, the number of excess deaths is staggering — yet this is not the only study that highlighted this issue.¹⁰

In another study, this time published in BMC Public Health, Norwegian researchers noted that there was an increase of excess mortality in Norway during 2020 to 2022. While it’s easy to assume that COVID-19 was the top culprit, it wasn’t:¹¹

“There was considerable excess non-COVID-19 mortality in Norway from March 2020 until December 2022, mainly due to excess cardiovascular deaths. For respiratory diseases and dementia, mortality was lower than predicted.”

Were the COVID shots responsible for this increase in excess mortality? While the researchers didn’t specify this as the reason, this line of thought was suggested. According to their findings, “There is a temporal concordance between increasing vaccine coverage and increasing excess mortality.”

New COVID Shots Are Still Approved Despite Condemning Evidence

In a report by SOMO, vaccine manufacturers such as Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna and Sinovac collectively made a staggering $90 billion in profit, and that’s just between 2021 and 2022. How much more will they make as more COVID-19 variants emerge? Clearly, the answer is “never enough,” as the gravy train is too profitable.

In a report¹² by The Defender, the JN.1 variant is the most dominant strain in 2024, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) vaccine advisory committee unanimously voted to include it in the vaccine composition for 2024 to 2025. The updated “vaccine” will also target subvariants KP.2 and KP.3.¹³ Unsurprisingly, when the vote was announced, shares of Novavax, a biotechnology company that manufactures vaccines, increased by 11%.¹⁴

Why is Big Pharma still pushing to manufacture these shots despite the glaring evidence of harm? The only answer that makes sense is the desire for profit — even at the cost of human lives. According to cancer researcher Dr. William Makis, the science isn’t at the center anymore:¹⁵

“Unfortunately, the entire LNP/mRNA Vaccine field is a fraud. It’s a failed technology with an unacceptably terrible side effect profile. The entire field now depends on the suppression of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine injuries and deaths, which are now in the millions (5.3 million in WHO VigiAccess alone), so we are no longer dealing with scientists but con artists …

They are trying to find ‘novel’ ways to market a failed technology platform and sneak failed vaccine products onto the market. The Moderna HIV mRNA Vaccine is such a product … And yes, they are moving forward, despite 20% of HIV mRNA Vaccine Victims developing skin rashes in Phase I trials. Moderna will repeat the Phase I trials with a slightly lower dose. The poisonings will continue until vaccine injuries improve.”

The COVID-19 Jabs Leave ‘Turbo Cancers’ in Their Wake

Based on mounting evidence, it seems that the recent uptick in “turbo cancers”¹⁶ may be a side effect of getting the jab. For those unfamiliar, oncologists coined this term to describe cancers that grow at such an alarming pace that patients frequently die before a proper treatment plan can even be executed.

In one example,¹⁷ described by board-certified internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, a 56-year-old man developed basaloid carcinoma shortly after he received an mRNA COVID-19 shot. The patient experienced symptoms just four days after getting the jab, noting similarities to Bell’s palsy and head pain. Shortly thereafter, a tumor developed on his face.

According to Dr. Makis,¹⁸ that kind of aggressiveness typically takes a few months to a couple of years. But in this case, it took only four days. The study notes:¹⁹

“We place this within the context of multiple immune impairments potentially related to the mRNA injections that would be expected to potentiate more aggressive presentation and progression of cancer.

The type of malignancy we describe suggests a population risk for occurrence of a large variety of relatively common basaloid phenotype cancer cells, which may have the potential for metastatic disease.”

In another report, published in Frontiers in Medicine, researchers found a rapid progression of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) — a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) — after receiving a COVID-19 booster shot. AITL is a cancer affecting the lymph system, primarily involving T-cells, a type of white blood cell that plays a crucial role in the immune system:²⁰

“Such a rapid evolution would be highly unexpected in the natural course in the disease. Since mRNA vaccination is known to induce enlargement and hypermetabolic activity of draining lymph nodes, it is reasonable to postulate that it was the trigger of the changes observed.

Indeed, the increase in size and metabolic activity was higher in axillary lymph nodes draining the site of vaccine injection as compared to their contralateral counterparts. However, pre-existing lymphomatous nodes were also clearly enhanced as compared to the first test. Moreover, new hypermetabolic lesions most likely of lymphomatous nature clearly appeared at distance of the injection site.”

How Turbo Cancers Can Possibly Develop

In a Highwire interview²¹ with Del Bigtree, Dr. Makis describes several possible mechanisms that can lead to cancer in susceptible individuals. The primary one is the modification of the mRNA used. The COVID shots actually don’t have the identical mRNA found in the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Instead, the mRNA has been manipulated through “codon optimization,” a process where a genetic code is inserted into the spike protein, creating a rigid “skeleton.”²² The reason codon optimization was used is because it’s required for clinical trials and subsequent mass manufacturing. However, there’s a downside to this, as noted by researchers:²³

“Unfortunately, some of the potential problems associated with codon optimization, which can affect protein function and increase immunogenicity, may not be seen until the drug is in late-stage clinical trials, or after the drug is on the market.”

Vaccine manufacturers bypassed this problem by making substitutions in the genetic instructions. Certain nucleotides (three nucleotides make up a codon) are swapped out, but still end up with the same protein. However, the enhanced efficiency comes at a price, which millions of people have already paid.

Injured by the Jab? These Resources Can Help

The best way to avoid exposing yourself to COVID jab-related injuries is by refusing the shot in the first place. But if you or a loved one already got it, what can you do?

The first step I recommend you take is seeking out expert advice. You can start by contacting the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). I believe that this organization has one of the best treatment protocols for those who were injured by the shot. The protocol’s name is I-RECOVER, which can be downloaded from covid19criticalcare.com.

The World Health Council has also published a database of remedies that can help inhibit and eliminate spike proteins, which most experts agree is the primary culprit of the injuries. I summarize the recommendations in my article, “World Council for Health Reveals Spike Protein Detox.”

• ¹ Meryl’s COVID Newsletter, June 4, 2024
• ² Frontiers in Immunology, Abstract
• ³ Medscape, Charlson Comorbidity Index Score (CCI Score)
• ⁴ Frontiers in Immunology, Results
• ⁵ The Defender, June 4, 2024
• ⁶ The Telegraph, June 5, 2024
• ⁷ BMJ Public Health 2024;2:e000282, Study Design
• ⁸ Our World in Data, Excess mortality during the Coronavirus pandemic, How is excess mortality measured?
• ^9, 10 BMJ Public Health 2024;2:e000282, Excess Mortality
• ¹¹ BMC Public Health 24, 244 (2024), Abstract
• ^12, 13 The Defender, June 5, 2024
• ¹⁴ Reuters, June 3, 2024
• ¹⁵ X, William Makis MD March 18, 2024
• ¹⁶ Makis MD Substack June 16, 2023
• ^17, 19 EXCLI Journal 2023;22:992-1011, Abstract
• ^18, 21 The HighWire With Del Bigtree, Is the COVID Vaccine Causing Turbo Cancers?
• ²⁰ Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8: 798095, Discussion
• ²² Ehden Substack August 20, 2021
• ²³ BioDrugs, 2018, Volume 32, 69-81, Summary and Conclusions

The paper, called “A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province,” examines death rates among different groups of people, including unvaccinated, one-dose injected, two-dose injected, and three- or more-dose injected. Those who get the most shots are the most likely to die, is the short of it.

People who get jabbed with two doses of a COVID shot – most “fully vaccinated” Americans took one of the two-dose mRNA (modRNA) injection series from either Pfizer and BioNTech or Moderna – are 137 percent more likely than the unvaccinated to die within 739 days post-jab.

“We found all-cause death risks to be even higher for those vaccinated with one and two doses compared to the unvaccinated and that the booster doses were ineffective,” the paper explains.

“We also found a slight but statistically significant loss of life expectancy for those vaccinated with 2 or 3 / 4 doses.”

(Related: Getting injected for COVID substantially increases your risk of death.)

Are vaccines causing our pets to live shorter lives?

If COVID injections were the only threat to society, we might stand a chance. The problem is that all vaccine injections are linked to negative health outcomes, including those administered to pets at veterinary clinics.

A case in point is a story told by “Napoleon” (@napoleonbusch2) on X about what veterinary vaccines did to a family of puppies he and his family got about 10 years ago.

“There were six puppies and they all died of cancer about five years ago except for my George,” Napoleon wrote. “He never had flea treatments or any vaccines. He’s still going strong at 15 and going for walks every day.”

This story prompted another named “Snoid” (@Snoidbergg) to reveal that vets administer the same vaccine doses to small dogs as they do to larger dogs since there are no regulations for either vaccines or food for dogs.

“Only get unvaccinated puppies,” Snoid urged. “Avoid flea poisons and flea collars. Feed your dog a raw organ and raw meat diet for teeth and general health just as wolves did.”

Cats are usually the ones that attract fleas, though someone named “Katharina Münz Kátla Mortensen Katlyn S. Coen” (@katharina_munz) responded that her family has five cats in the house and no fleas, despite never using anti-flea treatments.

“The only time we had fleas in the house was when I was raising hedgehog orphans,” Katharina said. “I just changed the newspaper in their cage twice every day and burnt it. After 3-4 days, no more fleas.”

Others wrote about how so many of their dogs died young from cancer, not just because of vaccines but also because of toxic dog food.

“Albert Bourla majored in animal meds so it makes sense,” wrote another, Bourla being the CEO of Pfizer.

“Worse – he has a Masters in goat reproduction,” responded the guy with the six puppies who died save for the one that was not vaccinated. “In most parts of the world, goats are a pest. Bourla has a Masters in mammalian pest management. Let that sink in.”

Erin Elizabeth from Health Nut News joined the conversation by revealing that all of her pets have lived 20 years except for one who only lived to 19-and-a-half because she was a rescue dog who was probably older to begin with than rescue workers thought.

“Our cats all lived 20 years,” Elizabeth added.

It is never a good idea to get injected for the Chinese Virus. Find out more at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

• X.com
• NaturalNews.com

The researchers looked at reports in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from January 1990 through December 2023.

They counted the number of cerebral thromboembolism events — as in, blood clots of the brain’s veins or arteries — reported in people who received a COVID-19 shot compared with those who received a flu shot or other vaccines.

Blood clots that block blood flow to the brain account for roughly 87% of all strokes, according to the American Stroke Association, a division of the American Heart Association.

McCullough — a cardiologist with over 1,000 publications and over 685 citations in the National Library of Medicine — told The Defender the study showed “an unacceptable risk of catastrophic thrombotic injuries to the brain” in individuals who took one or more COVID-19 shots.

McCullough summarized the study’s results on Substack:

“Compared to influenza vaccines given over 34 years, COVID-19 vaccines in 36 months of use had over 1000-fold increased risk of most blood clot events, and compared to all vaccines combined administered over 34 years, this risk remained at over 200-times greater with COVID-19 vaccination.”

Prior research has suggested that the spike protein in both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 vaccine can cause serious blood clotting, McCullough and his co-authors noted in their report.

Blood clots in the brain are difficult to treat, McCullough told The Defender, and “oftentimes leave patients with devastating disabilities.”

“This and other sources of data,” he added, “support calls to remove all COVID-19 vaccines from public use.”

The study — co-authored with Claire Rogers, Dr. James Thorp and Kirstin Cosgrove — is under peer review and available online as a preprint.

Women especially at risk

For the study, McCullough and his co-authors used 12 search terms to find VAERS reports of adverse events related to blood clots in the brain: cavernous sinus thrombosis, cerebral artery thrombosis, cerebral infarction, cerebral thrombosis, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, cerebral venous thrombosis, embolic cerebral infarction, ischaemic cerebral infarction, sigmoid sinus thrombosis, superior sagittal sinus thrombosis, thrombotic cerebral infarction and transverse sinus thrombosis.

In the three years since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, they found 5,137 reports of a brain blood clot event in those who received one or more COVID-19 shots.

Meanwhile, VAERS data showed only 52 reports since 1990 of a brain blood clot event following a flu vaccine and 282 since 1990 following all other vaccinations, they said.

The actual number of events may be higher due to underreporting in VAERS, they said, for several reasons.

First, CDC staff may have “tremendous difficulty” in processing the reports due to an overwhelming increase in VAERS reports since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

Also, clinicians may not have the necessary awareness and knowledge to recognize injuries as being vaccine-related and thus may not report them in VAERS.

Moreover, they added, “The VAERS database is well known for its difficulty in entering events, making it even more challenging for healthcare workers to submit each event with limited time in a hospital or clinic setting.”

The authors said their findings are especially concerning for women of reproductive age — who are particularly at risk for certain blood clotting events in the brain, such as cerebral venous thrombosis.

The American Heart Association said in a Jan. 29 review article that roughly two-thirds of all cerebral venous thrombosis cases occurred in women of reproductive age.

Given this reality, the study’s authors called for “an immediate global moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines … with an absolute contraindication in women of reproductive age.”

CDC: no plan to change COVID vaccine recommendations

The Defender asked the CDC if it planned to alter its COVID-19 vaccination recommendations in light of McCullough and his co-authors’ findings.

A CDC spokesperson told The Defender, the “CDC does not comment on findings or claims by individuals or organizations outside of CDC. Current CDC recommendations can be found here.”

The CDC has found the COVID-19 vaccines to be safe and effective, the spokesperson said. “The CDC continues to encourage Americans to get vaccinated, as the COVID-19 vaccination continues to be the best way to protect against serious illness.”

When asked specifically about the risks of COVID-19 vaccination for women of reproductive age, the CDC spokesperson directed The Defender to the CDC’s webpage COVID-19 Vaccines While Pregnant or Breastfeeding, which states that the vaccines are safe and effective.

She also raised critical questions about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and warned against the growing influence of international organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO).

Excess death data ‘literally earthshaking’

As the COVID-19 pandemic progressed, Sampson grew increasingly concerned about the data showing a rise in excess deaths among young and middle-aged adults in Maine.

In March, she decided to take action. Using 2015-2022 Maine all-cause mortality data analyzed by a statistician, she told her colleagues that Maine has since 2020 seen close to an 18% increase in excess deaths among 25- to 64-year-olds.

The spike in excess deaths for 2020 was 6.3% compared to the background rate of about 1.5% from 2015-2020.

Sampson cited the CEO of the One America insurance company, saying he “publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarter of 2021, death in people of working age 18 to 64 was 40% higher than it was before the pandemic.”

“This data was compiled by actuaries who are the mathematical experts insurance companies rely upon,” she said. “A 40% increase in deaths is literally earthshaking. Even a 10% increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event.”

She went on to describe the increasingly common phenomenon of “sudden deaths,” citing examples such as death by heart attack, stroke, meningitis, brain aneurysm, pulmonary embolism, anaphylaxis and asthma.

She encouraged lawmakers to do their own searches. “You will find hundreds, even thousands, of examples. A few years ago, this was unheard of.”

Sampson said the newly coined term “sudden death syndrome (SDS)” was a “silent epidemic” that demanded immediate attention and investigation.

She told lawmakers:

“SDS is an umbrella term. It includes biologically based scenarios describing [the] quick onset of unexpected mortality without prior signs of illness. I’ll repeat: without prior signs of illness.

“Autopsies may be non-conclusive due to the lack of obvious abnormalities. They may also be non-conclusive because we may not be asking the right questions.”

Citing what she called the “shocking” nature of the data, Sampson called for the Maine House to investigate.

“If there is even a chance this data is correct, we have the moral obligation to our children to investigate,” she said. “This data represents a flashing red light.”

However, despite her efforts, Maine lawmakers swiftly rejected Sampson’s joint order, along party lines. “The Democrats could not reject this order fast enough,” she told The Defender.

Two Democratic lawmakers, both doctors, approached her after her speech, wanting to know where she got the data and stating they thought the increased deaths were due to suicides.

In other discussions, Sampson said people didn’t want to believe the data. She encouraged them to “trust but verify” and asked why they were not doing their due diligence to investigate.

“They just shrugged their shoulders,” she said.

“We shut the whole damn state down for 6%,” she said. “What are we doing with almost 18%? As a mother and a grandmother, this entire issue deeply concerns me. I want my children and their children to have long, healthy lives. We need to get to the bottom of this.”

V-safe data ‘a resounding alarm’ on vaccine harms

In addition to her concerns about excess deaths, Sampson also has been a vocal advocate for vaccine safety and transparency.

In a separate action on the House floor on April 3, she presented alarming data from the CDC’s V-safe surveillance system, which tracks adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, and called for a ban on these vaccines.

Sampson began by explaining the significance of the V-safe data, noting that it was collected from over 10 million people who were among the first to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

“These were excited participants, eager for this new novel vaccine,” she said. “They wanted it to be safe and effective. They believed it was a good thing, and therefore would have no incentives to make up their stories.”

She revealed the shocking results of the V-safe data analysis:

“7.7%, or 782,013 people, needed medical attention. Of those 7.7%, 70% needed to be hospitalized or went to the ER or urgent care. Slightly less than 30% needed telehealth care. On average, each person needed medical attention two to three times.

“Additionally, 13% of the individuals reported they were unable to go to work or go to school, and about 12% were unable to perform normal activities.”

Sampson noted another 2.5 million people had to miss school, work or other normal activities. “This means 33% of unique individuals were affected by negative health impacts.”

She also highlighted the concerning symptoms reported in the free-text entries of the V-safe survey, including chest pains, heart palpitations, shortness of breath, tinnitus, menstrual disturbances and miscarriages.

Calling these statistics “a resounding alarm,” Sampson asked her colleagues to halt all COVID-19 vaccinations.

“The data are in — it is not safe and effective,” she said. “And until the federal government removes the liability shield from the vaccine manufacturers, the COVID-19 shot must be removed from the Maine market.”

Sampson told the Defender she once again faced resistance from her colleagues. She described their response as tense and uncomfortable, with many refusing to engage in further discussion or consider the implications of the V-safe data.

Pushback against WHO agenda

As the end of Sampson’s eight-year term limit approaches, she has turned her attention to the WHO agenda and its potential effect on Maine’s sovereignty and self-determination.

On April 11, she warned her Maine House colleagues about the WHO’s proposed pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations, arguing that they would grant the organization sweeping powers to dictate public health policies at the expense of individual states’ rights.

“Did you consent to it?” she asked her colleagues. “I know I didn’t.”

She warned about the critical votes of the World Health Assembly that took place several weeks ago in Geneva, Switzerland, explaining how these policies would be binding to Maine and other states “unless we make a clear declaration they have no authority.”

With the assistance of Dr. Meryl Nass and the information on the Door to Freedom website, Sampson provided her colleagues with a wealth of background information on the WHO’s agenda.

She highlighted specific aspects of the WHO’s agenda that she found particularly concerning, such as the proposed BioHub pathogen-sharing system and the push for nations to develop genetic sequencing labs.

“Does anyone see a problem with this?” she asked. “Is it just me? What about the high risks of lab leaks?”

Sampson said her colleagues “very quickly” voted down this joint order, also.

“It was heart-sickening to watch my colleagues on the other side of the aisle rapidly stand, object, and vote against this motion,” Sampson wrote.

“All I can say is now they are responsible for the information they have heard,” she told The Defender. “It is on the record.”

As Sampson prepares to leave the Maine House of Representatives, she shows no signs of slowing down in her fight for health freedom.

Sampson’s experiences in the legislature have only reinforced her belief in the importance of being a “squeaky wheel” and speaking truth to power, even in the face of overwhelming opposition.

She is spearheading the Maine Education Project, an initiative to expose the failures of the state’s education system and empower parents, teachers and school board members to effect change.