Perchlorate is a natural and human-made chemical that’s mostly used in the U.S. as a highly water-soluble salt component for rocket fuel and missiles. It’s also used in the production of other explosives, matches, batteries and plastics.

Perchlorate gets into food through contaminated groundwater used to irrigate crops or make processed foods. It’s also transferred to food from plastic food storage containers and old bleach — which can break down into perchlorate — used at food and water processing facilities.

The chemical is known to cause thyroid issues, which increases risk for metabolic disorders, and disruption of the brain and nervous system development in infants.

Federal regulators responsible for food and water safety have for decades been aware of water and soil contamination at locations where perchlorate has been stored, used or manufactured, according to the report, but haven’t taken the steps necessary to protect public health.

About 67% of the samples had ‘measurable’ levels of perchlorate

To assess perchlorate contamination in commonly eaten foods, researchers from Consumer Reports tested 196 samples of 73 grocery store foods and fast food items and their packaging.

About 67% of the samples had “measurable” levels of perchlorate. Overall, foods consumed by babies and children, along with fast food and fresh fruits and vegetables had the highest levels. In terms of packaging, foods in plastic containers had the highest levels, followed by foods in plastic wrap and paperboard.

None of the foods contained dangerous levels of perchlorate. However, the report said, that several servings of many of the foods in a day could add up to hazardous levels.

Also, because the chemical is present in so many foods, exposure over time can be dangerous — especially for pregnant women and children.

The researchers didn’t name the brands investigated. However, they did contact the manufacturers of the contaminated foods, none of whom responded.

James E. Rogers, Ph.D., director of product safety testing at Consumer Reports said, “Regulators should do more to protect the public from contaminants like perchlorate, but at the same time, parents shouldn’t panic about what we found.”

“Feeding your children a wide variety of healthy foods is the best way to make sure they get the nutrients they need and to minimize the potentially harmful effects of contaminants in food and water,” Rogers said.

Key questions answered by the report:

1. How much perchlorate is safe?

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2005 set a “reference dose” or safe exposure level for perchlorate at 0.7 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per day.

However, according to the European Food Safety Authority, perchlorate is safe at only 0.3 micrograms per kilogram of body weight — less than half the level determined safe by the EPA. Many food safety experts think the EPA’s level is too high, according to Consumer Reports.

Children are particularly at risk, even when the amount of perchlorate in food or water is relatively low because they are small and have lower body weight.

The researchers found perchlorate levels in food ranged from about 2 parts per billion to 79 parts per billion, and food in plastic containers averaged about 54 parts per billion.

The report gave some examples of what those numbers could mean. For a child between the ages of 1 and 2, they found that the boxed mac and cheese they tested would give the child 50% of the European Food Safety limit for perchlorate in a day.

The rice cereal, baby multigrain cereal and organic yogurt they tested each would give a child about 25% of the limit and a serving of cucumbers or baby carrots would provide over 50% of the limit, presumably because it had been irrigated with contaminated water.

2. What are the health risks?

According to the EPA, perchlorate toxicity in humans primarily targets the thyroid gland, which plays an important role in regulating metabolism and is key for normal growth and development in infants and children.

Perchlorate is a known endocrine disruptor that can interfere with the thyroid’s ability to absorb iodide, which the body needs to make thyroid hormones.

In adults, this could lead to hypothyroidism and related issues. But for children, the report said, “Thyroid hormones are critical for brain growth and development, and any disruption to that has the potential for lifelong effects.”

According to the report, research has shown that women with thyroid dysfunction who have higher perchlorate exposures during pregnancy have children who are three times as likely to show negative cognitive effects, including lowered IQ.

3. Why isn’t perchlorate regulated?

Because it is so difficult for consumers to avoid perchlorate, Consumer Reports said it is important for regulators to act — but the EPA and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) haven’t done much to protect public health, despite knowing about the problem since 1985.

At that time, perchlorate contamination was identified in wells near California Superfund sites — remnants of weapons testing by the U.S. Department of Defense — according to a report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Despite several public controversies over perchlorate, the FDA in 2005 permitted companies to use the chemical in food-contact materials. Within a few years, high levels of the chemical were detected in baby food that uses the packaging, the report said.

In 2019, the FDA for the third time denied a petition by food and environmental advocacy groups to ban the chemical from food packaging.

In 2011, the EPA concluded that between 5.2 and 16.6 million people could be exposed to contaminated water, yet the agency continually delayed plans to set perchlorate limits in drinking water. In 2020, the EPA argued that the chemical didn’t need to be regulated at all, because state and local governments were doing so.

After the Natural Resources Defense Council challenged that decision in a lawsuit, a court ordered the EPA to regulate the chemical. The agency said it will propose new drinking water limits by Nov. 21, 2025.

The EPA should also reconsider its recommended safe level, experts said, and the agency needs to set maximum contaminant levels for perchlorate in water, following the leads of states like Massachusetts, where the limit is 2 parts per billion and California, where it is 6 parts per billion, but with a stated goal to lower it.

Tom Neltner, a chemical engineer and attorney who is the national director for the nonprofit group Unleaded Kids, told Consumer Reports the FDA should revoke permission to use perchlorate in food contact materials.

The report also said the FDA could set a limit for perchlorate in food considering the unique health effects on kids.

We need to lean into this as much as we can because we know the powers-that-be are aware of it as well. They are in the process of preparing to subjugate us once again with lockdowns, mandates, and new jabs. Knowing that the old playbook will not be as effective on “normies,” we must expect that they’ll push out something more aggressive. That could mean manufactured “variants” that spread more easily or harm more readily. It could mean stricter regulations and more compelling diktats. It’ll likely be a combination of both. We need to share stories like the one below from Natural News that highlight information that many of us already knew. Just because we were aware doesn’t mean this won’t be news to “normies.” With that said, here’s Ethan Huff…

Fetal-maternal medicine specialist Dr. James Thorp spoke with Dr. Naomi Wolf recently about what he knows concerning the dangers of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines.”

One of the very few medical providers for pregnant women and babies to raise the alarm about the issue, Dr. Thorp revealed to Dr. Wolf that the shots appear to have been designed with stopping reproduction in mind.

Dr. Thorp was actually fired from his job at St. Mary’s Health System, one of the largest Catholic health systems in the country, for going public about what he and his wife Maggie, an attorney, discovered upon filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

Various so-called “influencers” were given a piece of a $13 billion pie to promote the mRNA injections from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

There was also a contract involving a for-profit OB/GYN non-governmental organization (NGO) who oversaw and influenced tens of thousands of obstetricians and gynecologists on multiple continents to push the jabs using government propaganda.

“The contract that the Thorps’ FOIA disclosed provides for the return of the money if medical organizations do not adhere to the ‘safe and effective’ for pregnant women and new moms script presented to them by HHS,” explains State of the Nation.

“Dr. Thorp independently confirms the WarRoom / DailyClout’s findings now from three other independent sources: that placentas, fetuses and newborns are being damaged by the mRNA injection.”

“All four sources confirm the same kinds of damage: fibrins, blood clots, ‘small for dates’ restricted growth and weight of the placentas, and calcifications. Meaning that babies of vaccinated moms in utero may not be getting enough food, and they may lack the room to grow normally.”

(Related: Only after nearly all service members in the U.S. military had already been forced to take COVID jabs did the Pentagon finally drop its deadly mandate.)

Every OB/GYN should have known COVID jabs would damage women and their unborn babies

Based on everything the Thorps uncovered, Dr. Thorp believes that every OB/GYN should have known that COVID jabs were dangerous for women and their unborn babies because they are inflammatory, which is catastrophic for pregnancy.

“I’m telling you that 95 percent of the physicians and nurses are captured by their paycheck,” Dr. Thorp told Dr. Wolf.

Dr. Thorp would go into great detail during the interview explaining how Pfizer attempted to hide the truth by keeping all damning data about the shots locked away for 75 years and launching a massive propaganda campaign.

“About 300 major organizations and influencers, including synagogues and churches, and many others, [convinced] the United States and the entire world that this deadly shot was safe, effective and necessary in the most vulnerable population: pregnant women.”

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) entered into a “covenant of death” pact with the American College of OB/GYN as well as with the influencers to peddle the lie that the shots are safe and effective for pregnant women and their babies.

“They took well over $11 million; they signed the covenant with death; and they’re not allowed to deviate one iota from the lethal narrative of HHS,” Dr. Thorp said.

“If they do, they will be liable for paying back every single penny, which they’ve already pocketed. So, that’s why the American College of OB/GYN, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, to this day, are the evil organizations that perpetrated this crime on the world. And I will not back down from attacking them because we have the proof.”

Check out the full interview at State of the Nation. COVID shots are a death sentence. Learn more at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sound off about this on my Substack.

Sources for this article include:

• StateOfTheNation.co
• NaturalNews.com

This warning came from Dr. William Makis, a Canadian physician with a triple specialization in radiology, oncology and immunology and the author of over 100 peer-reviewed medical articles. Makis provided two cases of babies who passed away due to being breastfed by mothers fully vaccinated against COVID-19. (Related: Nurse whistleblower: Fetal deaths have SKYROCKETED since pregnant women started being forced to get COVID-19 vaccines.)

One case involved a 36-year-old mother from New Mexico, who wrote about how her eight-week-old baby died on July 2021.

“He became very sick with a high fever on June 21, about two weeks after I got the first Pfizer vaccine,” she wrote. “He was treated for two weeks with IV antibiotics for a supposed bacterial infection, however they never found any bacteria.”

“After the 14-day course of antibiotics, he was home for one week, but exhibited strange symptoms,” she continued, noting how her child had a swollen eyelid, strange rashes and was regularly vomiting.

“I took him back to the hospital on July 15, where he presented with what they called an atypical Kawasaki disease. He passed away shortly thereafter from clots in his severely inflamed arteries,” she concluded.

Makis presented another case, that of a five-month old baby who died on March 20, 2021, just three days after the infant’s mother received her second dose of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine.

Just one day after the mother was fully vaccinated, the infant instantly developed a rash and “became inconsolable, refusing to eat and developed a fever,” Makis wrote. “Baby was brought to ER, blood analysis revealed elevated liver enzymes, was hospitalized but continued to decline and died on March 20, 2021, with a diagnosis of TTP.”

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a disorder characterized by the sudden formation of blood clots in small blood vessels that can block the flow of blood to vital organs like the brain, kidneys and heart.

Doctors have been warning against vaccinating pregnant and breastfeeding mothers since the beginning

Medical experts have been warning governments almost since the beginning of the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines that these jabs should be kept away from pregnant and breastfeeding women over serious concerns about their safety.

One such group – composed 66 doctors, scientists and other clinical practitioners – published its own open letter warning that the safety concerns about COVID-19 vaccinations in pregnancy are too dangerous to ignore.

The group, which includes obstetricians and gynecologists from the U.K., have warned against recent advice from medical organizations in the country about vaccinating pregnant women, claiming that it is in complete contradiction to everything that “it itself and academic institutions have been teaching about evidence-based medicine.”

“This advice is that: COVID-19 vaccines are not only safe but strongly recommended for pregnant women,” wrote the group in the letter. “Such advice is not grounded in robust data based on ethically conducted research – and anyone who is medically and academically trained should take serious issue with this.”

The experts noted how concerned and “deeply disturbed” they are about how best scientific practices are being distorted just to bring a newly developed pharmaceutical product to market.

“We have a collective duty to restore the principles of medical ethics to our practice and to clinical research to protect the most vulnerable groups from harm, and this includes pregnant women and their babies,” the group concluded.

Visit VaccineDamage.news for more stories about the side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Watch this video showing how so-called experts repeatedly told the world that the COVID-19 vaccines were safe for pregnant and breastfeeding women.

This video is from the COVID Times channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Pfizer data reveals COVID-19 vaccines were NEVER safe for pregnant women.
• TURBO CANCER: Children are DYING within hours or days of leukemia diagnosis, often after receiving vaccine jabs.
• The false messaging on vaccines given to pregnant women.
• Naomi Wolf: No more normal placentas since COVID-19 vaccine rollout.
• Dr. Bryan Ardis: Venom peptides produced from COVID-19 vaccines prevent embryos from attaching to the uterus, causing miscarriages.

Sources include:

• GlobalResearch.ca
• InfoWars.com
• Brighteon.com
• NATURAL NEWS

• Children eating vegan diets faced an increased risk of nutritional deficiencies and lower bone mineral content (BMC), and were shorter by about 3.15 centimeters (1.2 inches) than omnivores
• Concerning nutrient deficiencies were also found in the vegan children fed a nutritionist-planned diet
• Nutrient deficiencies in vegan children included vitamin A insufficiency and “markedly low” levels of total, HDL and LDL cholesterol, essential amino acids and the omega-3 fat DHA
• One of the pitfalls of a vegan (or vegetarian) diet is that many people end up relying on ultraprocessed foods such soy infant formula, soy milk or fake meat products
• In most cases, infants and children do best with whole, animal foods in their diet to meet their complex nutritional needs

The debate over the healthiest diet for children is almost as controversial as the debate over plant- versus meat-based diets. And, no vegan parent wants to be told that feeding their baby a vegan diet is dangerous. However, it could, in fact, be damaging to children’s health.

While it’s true that most people, children included, could benefit from adding more whole foods to their diets — including certain plant-based foods — there are risks involved when you move from eating a diet rich in plant foods to one that is strictly plant-based.

While the U.K.’s National Health Service (NHS) compiled a guide to feed vegan infants and children ages 5 and under, it noted:¹

“We are not recommending a vegan diet. It is important to note that meeting the nutritional requirements of babies and young children will be challenging on a vegan diet, and using fortified foods and some supplements will be essential. Animal sourced foods provide good sources of many nutrients to the diet.”

Vegan Children May Face Stunted Growth, Bone Problems

A study of Polish children between the ages of 5 and 10 years evaluated body composition, cardiovascular risk and micronutrient status of vegetarian and vegan children compared to omnivores.²

The study claimed vegan diets were associated with a healthier cardiovascular risk profile, but this was largely based on lower levels of LDL cholesterol — a flawed marker of heart health. The children eating vegan diets also faced an increased risk of nutritional deficiencies, lower bone mineral content (BMC) and were shorter by about 3.15 centimeters (1.2 inches). According to the study:³

“Our data suggest that restriction of animal-based foods could prevent children from achieving optimal height or bone mineral status and could lead to selected nutritional deficiencies. The shorter height of children consuming PBDs [plant-based diets] may have mixed implications for long-term health. Taller height is associated with higher social status, and this association may be causal rather than just an artifact of social correlates.”

The researchers called the lower bone mineral content among those eating a vegan diet “concerning,” since maximizing bone mineral content in childhood is recommended to reduce the risk of osteoporosis and fractures later in life:⁴

“We found that vegans have lower BMC even after accounting for smaller body and bone size. It does not seem optimal to enter adolescence, a phase when bone-specific nutrient needs are higher, with a BMC deficit already established. If such deficits are caused by a diet that persists into adolescence, this might increase the risk of adverse bone outcomes later in life.”

Vegans Faced Several Nutrient Deficiencies

The vegan children in the group were more likely to suffer from vitamin B12 deficiency, low HDL levels and lower vitamin D levels,⁵ each of which could have implications for their current and future health.

Vitamin B12, also known as cobalamin, is necessary for your body to make red blood cells as well as for proper nerve function and DNA synthesis. Without adequate levels, a number of physical symptoms, ranging from numbness to fatigue, can occur. Mental health can also suffer significantly, as vitamin B12 plays an important role in neurological function.

It’s been shown, for instance, that people with depression and high B12 levels have better responses to treatment,⁶ while up to 30% of patients hospitalized for depression may be B12 deficient.⁷

While choline, a B vitamin known for its role in brain development, wasn’t covered in the featured study, it’s another essential nutrient that humans must get from dietary or supplement sources. Animal foods are a major contributor of choline to the diet, and it’s difficult to get enough of this essential nutrient if you don’t consume them, particularly eggs, according to a study published in the journal Nutrients.⁸

Additionally, important nutrients such as carnitine, carnosine and creatine are also very low in a plant based diet and ideally need to be supplemented. In another example, researchers followed 40 children with a median age of 3.5 years who attended a Finnish daycare.⁹ There, they received nutritionist-planned vegan or omnivore meals designed to meet their nutritional needs.

However, even then, concerning nutrient deficiencies were found in the vegan children, including vitamin A insufficiency and “markedly low” levels of total, HDL and LDL cholesterol, essential amino acids and the omega-3 fat DHA. According to the researchers:¹⁰

“The markedly low cholesterol in vegan infants and children in our study raises the question of whether such levels are healthy, as cholesterol is essential for cellular growth, division, and development of physiological systems due to its major role in the synthesis of cell membranes, steroid hormones, bile acids, and brain myelin …

DHA and active vitamin A are both important for eyesight, and the low statuses of both in [vegan] children may raise a concern for the visual health.”

Recommendations for Soy Milk Put Children at Risk

NHS also states that, from the age of 1, “you can give your baby unsweetened, calcium-fortified, plant-based drinks (such as soya, oat and almond drinks) as part of a healthy balanced diet.”^11,12

However, not only is most soy genetically engineered (GE) and sprayed with toxic pesticides and herbicides like Roundup, with its dangerous active ingredient glyphosate, but soy products contain phytoestrogens such as genistein, which may affect the development of the reproductive system.¹³

When it comes to soy formula, I believe it’s unsuitable for all children. But soy-based beverages should also be avoided later in childhood, and you’ll definitely want to steer clear of ultraprocessed foods like Soylent.

Soylent is a Silicon Valley creation, dreamed up by a group of software engineers¹⁴ with no education in nutrition or human biology. The primary premise behind Soylent is that you can drink your complete nutritional requirements and never have to eat real food again. But this GE concoction, which is heavily promoted as a panacea to fill in nutritional gaps in those following plant-based diets, will not propel you, or your children, to optimal health.

Its products contain ingredients like soy protein isolate, canola oil — a major dietary source of toxic linoleic acid — artificial flavors and the artificial sweetener Sucralose.¹⁵ Unfortunately, one of the pitfalls of a vegan (or vegetarian) diet is that many people end up relying on ultraprocessed foods such as this, mistakenly believing them to be healthy.

Fake, Plant-Based Meat, Dairy Aren’t Healthy Either

Raising children on a diet of plant-based “burgers” isn’t doing their health any favors either. Swapping traditional, whole foods grown by small farmers for mass-produced fake foods grown in a laboratory is, unfortunately, part and parcel of The Great Reset.

The EAT Forum, co-founded by the Wellcome Trust, developed a Planetary Health Diet that’s designed to be applied to the global population and entails cutting meat and dairy intake by up to 90%, replacing it largely with foods made in laboratories, along with cereals and oil.¹⁶

Sadly, this is not what you or your children need to thrive, but it’s being pushed as a healthy, green and sustainable alternative to animal foods. As such, lab-grown, animal-free milk proteins are becoming all the rage.

The process to make these concoctions is far from natural, but one company, Perfect Day, is trying to get around that, describing their process as involving “nature’s code,” which is another way of describing the DNA that they are manipulating.¹⁷

They use GE fungi microflora, which they go so far as to say “grazes” on plant-based inputs, hoping your mind’s eye will revert to a cow grazing in a field, rather than the tanks in which their GE fungi are actually grown.

It’s quite telling that, while the healthiest dairy products come from grass fed cows that are integrated into their surrounding environment, Perfect Day’s fake milk proteins can only be produced in a system that’s isolated from the outside world.¹⁸

In the foreword to Navdanya International’s report “False Solutions That Endanger Our Health and Damage the Planet,” Vandana Shiva also details how lab-grown foods are catastrophic for human health and the environment, as they are repeating the mistakes already made with industrial agriculture:¹⁹

“In response to the crises in our food system, we are witnessing the rise of technological solutions that aim to replace animal products and other food staples with lab-grown alternatives. Artificial food advocates are reiterating the old and failed rhetoric that industrial agriculture is essential to feed the world.

Real, nutrient-rich food is gradually disappearing, while the dominant industrial agricultural model is causing an increase in chronic diseases and exacerbating climate change. The notion that high-tech, “farm free” lab food is a viable solution to the food crisis is simply a continuation of the same mechanistic mindset which has brought us to where we are today — the idea that we are separate from and outside of nature.

Industrial food systems have reduced food to a commodity, to “stuff” that can then be constituted in the lab. In the process, both the planet’s health and our health have been nearly destroyed.”

Beware of Fake Breastmilk Dubbed Biomilq

Breastmilk is the healthiest food for babies, one that can’t be replicated in a lab. But that didn’t stop Bill Gates from announcing the startup company Biomilq in June 2020. It’s using biotechnology to create lab-made human milk for babies.

Using mammary epithelial cells placed in flasks with cell culture media, the cells grow and are placed in a bioreactor that the company says “recreates conditions similar to in the breast.”²⁰ Another company, Helaina, aims to create glycoproteins “identical to those found in breast milk,”²¹ which can then be added to a variety of infant formulas. They may also be used in seniors’ nutrition and, eventually, all sorts of foods.

Many familiar globalists are invested in these faux dairy ventures. Biomilq investors, for example, include Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Richard Branson, SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son, Chinese business magnate Jack Ma, Michael Bloomberg and Salesforce Co-CEO Marc Benioff.²²

The first Biomilq product is expected to be ready for the market within the next three to five years.²³ Other animal-free milk products are expected to hit the shelves sometime between 2023 and 2024.^24,25 That includes ice cream made with lab-grown dairy, slated to go into Ben & Jerry’s product line.²⁶

But don’t be fooled. Fake meat and dairy cannot replace the complex mix of nutrients found in grass fed beef and dairy — or in human breastmilk — and it’s likely that consuming ultraprocessed meat and milk alternatives may lead to many of the same health issues that are caused by a processed food diet. So if you’re vegan, or raising vegan children, do not base your diet around these pseudofoods.

What’s the Healthiest Food for Babies?

Breastmilk is the healthiest food for babies, but if you’re a strict vegetarian or vegan, be sure you make a point to supplement where needed, including for choline, omega-3s, folate and vitamin B12. If you’re unable to breastfeed or obtain human breastmilk for your baby, I do not recommend using commercial infant formula — and especially not soy-based varieties.

Instead, you can find my preferred recipe for healthy homemade infant formula here. You’ll notice it’s not vegan — it’s filled with nutrient-rich animal foods, such as raw grass fed cow milk, organic cream and beef hydrolysate gelatin, along with some items that many vegans will be familiar with, such as nutritional yeast flakes and organic, virgin coconut oil.

In most cases, infants and children do best with whole, animal foods in their diet to meet their complex nutritional needs.

• ¹ NHS, Eating well: vegan infants and under-5s, Page 5
• ^{2, 3, 4, 5} Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun; 113(6): 1565–1577
• ⁶ Open Neurol J. 2013; 7: 44–48
• ⁷ Compr Psychiatry. 1997 Nov-Dec;38(6):305-14
• ⁸ Nutrients August 5, 2017
• ⁹ EMBO Mol Med. 2021 Feb 5; 13(2): e13492
• ¹⁰ EMBO Mol Med. 2021 Feb 5; 13(2): e13492., Discussion
• ¹¹ NHS, Getting ready
• ¹² Daily Mail January 16, 2023
• ¹³ Environmental Health Perspectives March 12017; 125(3)
• ¹⁴ Soylent, About
• ¹⁵ Soylent Powder, Cacao, Ingredient List
• ¹⁶ Eatforum.com The Planetary Health Diet
• ¹⁷ Perfect Day Foods, Nature’s Code
• ¹⁸ Perfect Day Foods, Fermentation Tanks
• ¹⁹ Children’s Health Defense April 5, 2022
• ²⁰ BIOMILQ, Our Science
• ²¹ Food Navigator December 12, 2022
• ²² CNBC June 16, 2020
• ²³ Alarabiya.net May 3, 2022
• ²⁴ Startup Daily July 27, 2021
• ²⁵ Sydney Spring Herald September 13, 2022
• ²⁶ ZME Science December 9, 2022

This is according to Michelle Gershman, a registered nurse who spoke with Dr. James Thorp and members of the organization Children’s Health Defense regarding the connection between the COVID-19 vaccines and fetal death.

Thorp, a veteran obstetrician-gynecologist, described Gershman’s testimony about how pregnant women were “pushed” into an “experimental gene therapy” program as “the most egregious ethical disaster in the history of medicine. It’s an unparalleled disaster.”

“I don’t understand how people just brush it off and pretend it’s not a big deal,” said Gershman. “It’s absolutely a big deal. I do truly believe that babies are given to us by God, they’re meant to bring us love and joy, and if something comes between that, trying to take your baby away, to me that’s absolutely evil.” (Related: HOLOCAUST OF THE UNBORN: Babies are DYING because their mothers got “vaccinated” for COVID.)

Gershman noted that more unborn babies began dying in her hospital right around the spring of 2021, when the COVID-19 vaccines first started being distributed in the United States.

“I already noticed that this increase in fetal demises was happening, but no one was really saying anything about them,” recalled Gershman. “When I started working there, I would see one fetal demise every two or three months. And then when these shots started coming out, we were starting to see them maybe once a week.”

More women and infants started experiencing health complications following rollout of vaccines

Gershman has worked as a postpartum nurse since Nov. 2020, around the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. She noted that the coronavirus did not appear to adversely affect infant mortality or cause any major health issues for most pregnant women.

But starting in spring 2021, when the COVID-19 vaccines started becoming more widespread, Gershman started noticing all kinds of health complications pop up for pregnant women, mostly circulatory problems. These include women who still have high blood pressure even after giving birth and women experiencing blood clots and bursting of blood vessels in the eyes at far higher rates.

Many babies who were born to vaccinated women were unusually fatigued and their faces would come out discolored or even bruised. Many of these newborns had to spend some time in the hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit due to having difficulty breathing.

For months, administrators at Gershman’s hospital refused to address the issue. But by Sept. 2022, a hospital manager finally emailed employees admitting that the number of fetal deaths went from one or two per month to at least 20 each month. Gershman noted that the sudden rise coincided with the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines.

Unfortunately, rather than call for proper approaches on how to save the dying newborns, the hospital manager informed hospital staff to “brush up on your policies” in order to “be able to handle a dead baby.”

“I really think a lot of people are in a trance and they just don’t want to admit that the vaccine could possibly be harming all these moms and babies,” said Gershman. She noted that a lot of people either really do not know or are unwilling to recognize the connection between the COVID-19 vaccines and the rise in reported health complications in hospitals. She believes this is because “so many of them are programed to think that vaccines are good when they’re not.”

Learn more about how the COVID-19 vaccines affect infants at Infanticide.news.

Watch this episode of “The Highwire” as Del Bigtree reports on Michelle Gershman’s testimony regarding the rise in fetal deaths from vaccinated mothers.

This video is from the channel The HighWire with Del Bigtree on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Former Australian MP warns 75% of COVID-19 vaccinated women are experiencing miscarriages.
• Stillbirths are skyrocketing in the post-COVID vaccination era, leaked hospital email reveals.
• Florida OB/GYN warns that infertility and miscarriages have spiked 50% since COVID-19 vaccine rollout.
• OB/GYN says COVID jabs are triggering “massive,” “unprecedented” adverse events in pregnant women, babies.
• Newborn deaths in Scotland reach worrying levels TWICE in six months.

Sources include:

• LifeSiteNews.com
• Live.ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• Brighteon.com
• NATURAL NEWS

• Artificial intelligence expert Catriona Campbell predicts virtual children will be commonplace within the next 50 years, which can help combat overpopulation
• The virtual children would only exist within the metaverse, and parents would interact with them using high-tech wearables like gloves that can deliver tactile feedback to replicate physical sensations
• Climate change, overpopulation, transhumanism and the digitization of human life are all part and parcel of The Great Reset agenda, which will not be complete until humanity is enslaved to the unelected few who will run the world through algorithms and AI
• World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab wants to create a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their brains. This is what the Fourth Industrial Revolution is all about — the merger of man and machine. This is how we know, without a doubt, that transhumanism is part of The Great Reset
• The technocratic, transhumanist cabal also wants to track your individual carbon footprint and dictate your diet. Meat consumption is to be cut by 90% and replaced with fake lab-created meats and bugs

Yesterday, I reviewed the claims of Google engineer Blake Lemoine, who is convinced an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot program called LaMDA has achieved sentience, or self aware consciousness.¹

Mere days before Lemoine set the internet on fire with discussions about the possibility or impossibility of AI singularity, another AI expert made the news with the prediction that virtual children could one day become commonplace. Come to think of it, it’s almost as if the news were rolled out by an AI running a predictive programming algorithm. The Daily Mail reports:²

“Virtual children that play with you, cuddle you, and even look like you will be commonplace in 50 years, and could help to combat overpopulation, an artificial intelligence expert has claimed.

These computer-generated offspring will only exist in the immersive digital world known as the ‘metaverse,’ which is accessed using virtual reality technology such as a headset to make a user feel as if they’re face-to-face with the child. They will cost next to nothing to bring up, as they will require minimal resources, according to Catriona Campbell, one of the UK’s leading authorities on AI and emerging technologies.

In her new book, ‘AI by Design: A Plan For Living With Artificial Intelligence,’ she argues that concerns about overpopulation will prompt society to embrace digital children.

‘Virtual children may seem like a giant leap from where we are now, but within 50 years technology will have advanced to such an extent that babies which exist in the metaverse are indistinct from those in the real world,’ she writes. ‘As the metaverse evolves, I can see virtual children becoming an accepted and fully embraced part of society in much of the developed world’ …

Ms Campbell believes that people will one day be able to use high-tech gloves that are able to deliver tactile feedback to replicate physical sensations. This would allow someone to cuddle, feed and play with their digital offspring as though it were a real child.”

It wouldn’t be exactly true to life, however, as parents would have the ability to choose the rate at which their digital offspring grows up. So, those who enjoy the baby stage, for example, could keep the child in perpetual babyhood, forgoing all the experiences that go along with maturing through the teen years into adulthood.

Baby X

There’s already a proof of concept for this idea. “BabyX”³ is a digital experiment created by a New Zealand-based company called Soul Machines, several years ago. The idea behind it was to facilitate acceptance of AI by humanizing it. Soul Machines explains it this way:⁴

“By combining models of physiology, cognition and emotion with advanced lifelike CGI, we set out to create a new form of biologically inspired AI. BabyX was our first developmental prototype designed as both a stand-alone research project and as an expandable base to feed into commercial computer agents.

She enables us to explore human cooperation with machines and the foundations for creating a digital consciousness. BabyX was designed for research and ‘she’ allows Soul Machines to not only explore the models of human behavior but also to create autonomous digital beings.

BabyX provides a foundation from which we learn, experiment and continue to develop the world’s first end-to-end solution for dynamically creating, teaching, managing and deploying Digital People.”

The Transhumanist Agenda

By now, many have started realizing that climate change, overpopulation, transhumanism and the digitization of human life are all part and parcel of The Great Reset agenda, which will not be complete until humanity is enslaved to the unelected few who will run the world through algorithms and AI.

According to the technocratic cabal that has set the course for mankind over the last several decades, overpopulation is responsible for climate change,⁵ so to save the planet, we have to reduce and manage the population size. One way of doing this is to transition into a digital environment, the metaverse, where no actual physical resources are being used up.

On the extreme end of the transhumanist spectrum, you have people who believe we will eventually be able to upload our minds into a computer or synthetic avatar.⁶ We still don’t know if this is possible, and it seems highly unlikely, considering there’s more to a human than their physical brain and neuronal network. Your “mind” and “soul,” your actual “being,” is not localized in your brain tissue.

Transhumanism doesn’t acknowledge the reality of nonlocal mind or soul, however, choosing instead to view the human being as nothing more than a physical platform⁷ that can be altered and augmented in any number of ways, equipped with a reproducible neural network that allows for thinking and intelligence given the correct electrical impulses and neural connections.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution

World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab wants to create a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their brains. This is what the Fourth Industrial Revolution⁸ is all about — the merger of man and machine. This is how we know, without a doubt, that transhumanism is part of The Great Reset.

Of course, being connected to the cloud also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior,⁹ and that too is part of the plan. They absolutely want to be able to control your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behaviors, from the inside.¹⁰

Transhumanism also involves the selective breeding of physical bodies, using artificial wombs rather than human beings. Already, Chinese scientists have used CRISPR technology to create the first gene-edited babies (born in 2018).^11,12 They’ve also developed an AI nanny robot to care for embryos grown inside an artificial womb. As reported by Futurism:¹³

“The system could theoretically allow parents to grow a baby in a lab, thereby eliminating the need for a human to carry a child. The researchers go so far as to say that this system would be safer than traditional childbearing.”

To most normal people, a future of designer babies grown in artificial wombs, brain-to-cloud connectivity and uploading your mind to a computer sounds more like a purposeless nightmare than the utopia transhumanists try to portray it as. Schwab, however, speaks as though we have no choice in the matter. “The future is built by us,” he told the WEF insiders at the 2022 meeting in Davos.¹⁴ End of discussion.

The Rise of Anti-Humanism

Part of why Great Reset adherents seem so dissociated from human life is because they are. Most normal people believe humans are sovereign beings who are free by divine authority. Technocracy, on the other hand, views humans as a natural resource, no different from an oil deposit or livestock, and they are to be used as such.

Humans may be more or less efficient than a robot, for example, depending on the job at hand, and efficiency trumps humanity. To minimize problems within this human resource management system, there needs to be maximum compliance with minimal effort, and this is where social engineering through media propaganda (brainwashing), censorship and AI comes in.

For the most part, once fully implemented, the control system will be fully automated, with direct connection to your brain. Beliefs may be switched from one day to the next with a simple software update, automatically downloaded and installed from the cloud. That’s their dream, and our nightmare.

They Want to Track Your Carbon Footprint

Many still have a hard time wrapping their heads around the extent to which the technocratic, transhumanist cabal intends to control the global population. In short, they intend to control every single aspect of everything you do on a daily basis. Not only do they not want you to exercise free will, they don’t even believe free will exists.¹⁵

So, they intend to micromanage your life through digital surveillance, facial and voice recognition, through carbon credit scores and social credit scores, through digital identities and/or vaccine passports, through climate change countermeasures and biosecurity measures, through AI assistants, online censorship and social engineering.

They intend to control what resources you can use, where you can travel, your health and medical decisions, what you think and what you eat. Look closely, and you will find that all of these plans have already been announced and implementation is in the works.

For example, in August 2021, The Hill published an op-ed by libertarian analyst Kristin Tate, warning a social credit system is coming to America.¹⁶ Two years earlier, in 2019, Futurism¹⁷ wrote about how the U.S. already has a social credit system that is very similar to China’s, we just haven’t realized it yet, because it was built by Silicon Valley rather than the government.

The plans for individual carbon footprint trackers were announced¹⁸ at this year’s Davos meeting for WEF members and invited VIPs. The trackers are being developed by the Chinese Alibaba Group,¹⁹ which makes sense, considering the Chinese have already implemented a social credit system²⁰ and individual carbon tracking will be an added facet of that.

In a June 3, 2022, article, RAIR (Rise Align Ignite Reclaim) commented on the WEF’s plans for global control:

“After a quietly held WEF and United Nations General Assembly summit in Switzerland on ‘sustainability,’ they released several shocking videos²¹ showcasing a glimpse into life after The Great Reset.

From people without possessions, pumped full of pills, eating laboratory-created meat in hyper-technical, digitally networked ‘smart cities’ and clothing. They created short, bizarre, feel-good videos highlighting how people will help them redesign the world.

The videos range from cows that no longer burp methane thanks to tablets, starfish created in test tubes to fight climate change, drones for reforestation in Africa, enzymes from human blood to stabilize concrete, and poor hygiene to save the environment.

The WEF also promoted new mRNA vaccinations against various diseases. In addition, they celebrated 24-hour surveillance, digital IDs for clothing, and artificial food and coffee.”

They Want to Control Your Diet

The technocratic cabal also intends to radically transform the food system, and are now busily working on ways to eliminate meat from our diet²² and convince us to replace it with synthetic lab creations and fake meat, which by the way is loaded with the worst kind of fat imaginable — industrial seed oils.

To this end, the WEF has partnered with the EAT Forum, which will set the political agenda for global food production. The EAT Forum was cofounded by the Wellcome Trust, which in turn was established with the financial help of GlaxoSmithKline.

EAT collaborates with nearly 40 city governments across Africa, Europe, Asia, North and South America and Australia, and maintains close relationships with imitation meat companies such as Impossible Foods, which was cofunded by Google, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates.²³ (Gates has also been gobbling up farmland, becoming one of the largest private land owners in the U.S.²⁴)

EAT has developed a “Planetary Health Diet” that is designed to be applied to the global population and entails cutting meat and dairy intake by up to 90%, replacing it largely with foods made in laboratories, along with cereals and oil.²⁵ Not surprisingly, Gates is on record urging Western nations to stop eating real meat altogether.²⁶

Bugs — It’s What’s for Dinner

Forcing a transition to fake meats is bad enough, but it gets worse. Perhaps you’ve seen the odd article here and there over the past few years suggesting we should consider eating bugs and weeds and drink “reclaimed” sewage?²⁷ Well, those were part of the predictive programming to prime the pump, so to speak. Now we’re entering the real indoctrination phase.

Four primary schools in Wales, U.K., recently conducted a real-world trial to see how children would take to eating mealworms, crickets, beetles and other insects, while simultaneously being indoctrinated to think they’re becoming “ethical citizens” who are saving the planet by ditching meat. According to RAIR, which reported the novel lunch experiment:²⁸

“… the unelected self-anointed global elitists at the WEF have fought for years for westerners to eat bugs … ‘Would you give edible insects a try to help save the planet?’ …

Two years ago, the European Union (EU) classified insects as ‘novel foods.’ In other words: the preparations for insect food have been underway for a long time. As a result, edible insects are increasingly sold across the EU.

The UK Food Safety Authority (FSA) will provisionally allow trade in edible insects in supermarkets and retailers starting in June [2022], with full approval expected next year. Evaluation is currently underway for crickets for human consumption; mealworms are also expected to be submitted soon.”

Being able to see the globalists’ plan as clearly as we can see it now, we have an obligation to future generations to resist, denounce and refuse any and all implementations of the technocratic agenda. We can win, for the simple fact that there are more of us than there are of them, but we have to be vocal about it — we need to join forces and present a united front. We need to peacefully resist and say “No thank you” to everything they try roll out.

• ¹ Medium “Is LaMDA Sentient?”
• ² Daily Mail May 31, 2022
• ^3, 4 Soul Machines Baby X
• ⁵ The Conversation January 28, 2020
• ⁶ Interesting Engineering December 7, 2021
• ^7, 10 Human Augmentation — The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project May 2021
• ⁸ Weforum Fourth Industrial Revolution
• ⁹ CNN November 26, 2019
• ¹¹ Technology Review November 25, 2018
• ¹² AP News November 26, 2018
• ¹³ Futurism February 1, 2022
• ¹⁴ YouTube May 24, 2022
• ¹⁵ Mind Matters October 4, 2018
• ¹⁶ The Hill August 3, 2021
• ¹⁷ Futurism August 27, 2019
• ^18, 19 The Sociable May 25, 2022
• ²⁰ Check My File, How China’s Social Credit Score System Works
• ²¹ RAIR October 20, 2021
• ^22, 25 Eatforum.com The Planetary Health Diet
• ²³ The Defender November 9, 2020
• ²⁴ Land Report, January 11, 2021
• ²⁶ Forbes March 22, 2021
• ²⁷ The Conversation September 1, 2019
• ²⁸ RAIR June 3, 2022