Confidential Pfizer documents leaked by Project Veritas show that Big Pharma had “evidence that suggests patients who received a (COVID-19) vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”

Meanwhile, heavily redacted CDC documents obtained by the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request indicate that the agency provided an undercounted figure of post-COVID-19 vaccination myocarditis cases to Israel’s Ministry of Health in early 2021.

The latest revelations come as Germany, Japan and other governments are raising questions about the significant numbers of severe adverse events recorded in individuals following the administration of the vaccines.

“This study clearly shows that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine provides almost no benefit to children and adolescents, but does increase their risk of myocarditis and pericarditis,” said Dr. Brian Hooker, CHD’s chief scientific officer. “It begs the question: Why does the CDC continue to recommend these unlicensed shots for kids? Where is the data they use to support their statement that the benefits of these vaccines outweigh the risks?”

The Pfizer vaccine provided children and teens in England with only about 14 to 15 weeks of protection against the virus, as per a preprint study of over 1.7 million children ages five to 15.

Moreover, researchers investigating the safety and effectiveness of Pfizer’s vaccine in fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated children and teens, also found cases of myocarditis and pericarditis only in vaccinated children. The study found that vaccinated children required slightly fewer emergency room visits and hospital stays, but that those outcomes were extremely rare in children and teens across all groups.

COVID-19 vaccine provides almost no benefit to children, study reveals

Public health agencies in the United Kingdom and the U.S. granted authorization to the Pfizer vaccines based on clinical trials that measured immunogenicity and efficacy against infection.

Their research confirmed that even in 2021, when the vaccine was first authorized for children and teens, that age group did not face a high risk for COVID-19-related serious outcomes, including death or the need for emergency care, hospitalization or critical care.

The researchers tested the effectiveness of the first vaccine dose versus no vaccine and of two doses versus a single dose. They matched each vaccinated child with an unvaccinated one, and participants were matched by age, sex, region, prior COVID-19 testing and childhood vaccination status.

Of the 1,262,784 children in the adolescent part of the study, vaccinated and unvaccinated, there were only 72 emergency room visits, 90 COVID-19 hospitalizations and no deaths. There were nine cases of pericarditis and three cases of myocarditis, all in the vaccinated group.

Among all of the children in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated group, there were no emergency visits, only six hospitalizations and no deaths related to COVID-19. There were three cases of pericarditis, all in vaccinated children.

The researchers concluded that in adolescents, the vaccine reduced the rate of hospitalization more than it increased the risk for myocarditis and pericarditis, but for children, the increased risk of pericarditis was higher than the reduction of risk for hospitalization.

Visit VaccineInjury.news for similar stories. Watch this video featuring a discussion on COVID accountability. This video is from the Sanivan channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• Brighteon.com

Rep. Massie caught the CDC lying in its official publication (MMWR) about COVID jab efficacy all the way back in December 2020. He further confirmed the lies by calling the CDC and recording the answers he received to questions about the shots.

When the CDC refused to tell the general public the truth, Rep. Massie took it upon himself to share the recordings with investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson who exposed them publicly.

“The CDC, in a paper that had to be written by the vaccine makers in my mind, lied about what the studies found, which encouraged people who probably already had immunity because they already had COVID, to go out and get a vaccine that could give them side effects,” Attkisson explains in the video below.

“So they created or worsened what could be considered a crisis by their misinformation … And my big question is, the misinformation was signed off on by something like twelve members of this CDC expert committee. Did none of them read the original studies as I had and as Congressman Massie had? Do they just sign papers somebody else writes and not understand the data and the claims in it are wrong? I think this is a huge scandal and nobody’s been held to account for that.”

Sharyl Attkisson on How Rep. Thomas Massie Caught the CDC Lying About the COVID Vaccines

"The CDC, in a paper that had to be written by the vaccine makers in my mind, lied about what the studies found which encouraged people who probably already had immunity because they… pic.twitter.com/lY49S1YbHU

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) September 7, 2024

(Related: Remember when the CDC pushed older people to take all of the latest COVID “booster” shots “every four months?”)

Nobody trusts Washington anymore

Scandals like this one are precisely why a growing percentage of the U.S. population no longer trusts the CDC or any other federal government agency, especially after what happened during the COVID “pandemic.”

“I hope a Trump administration will provide more transparency and open debate so that trust can be rebuilt,” someone wrote on X in hopeful anticipation of some soon changes.

Another X user added to Rep. Massie’s claims by stating that he caught the government hiding vaccine deaths from the public by deleting what is known as Y59.0 from death records.

“It’s even sworn to in testimony,” this person, named John Beaudoin Sr. “aka Coquin de Chien” (@JohnBeaudoinSr), added. “Haven’t heard from any media or politician yet about it. All document in official government records. All teed up.”

Others praised Rep. Massie for doing this work, especially as many of his colleagues have long since moved on to other matters.

“Exposing them is one thing, but will there ever be actual accountability?” asked another. “Like actual consequences. Jury trials. Prison sentences. Asset forfeiture. Compensation to the individuals harmed. If not, they’ll just continue business as usual.”

It is hard to imagine how the CDC could have come to the conclusion that lying to the public about COVID jabs was a winning strategy, especially in the age of the internet.

“I’d have thought losing the trust of the public might have serious consequences should they ever have to deal with a genuine pandemic,” one said.

“They’ve been committing fraud for decades,” wrote another. “They covered up the autism and MMR link, they shredded data, they have had several whistleblowers come forward and yet, they carry on without any repercussions. Maybe Congress can do something about this?”

The latest news about the highly corrupt CDC can be found at CDC.news.

Sources for this article include:

• X.com
• NaturalNews.com

The latest Moderna vaccine is now intended for administration in six-month-old babies, with a booster given one month after the first. The Pfizer vaccine is also intended for administration at six months old, with the second dose coming three weeks later, and a third dose no later than eight weeks after the second. These vaccines will be routinely given to babies under 15 months, along with an additional thirty-seven shots, all of which have not been subject to double blind, placebo-controlled studies, nor been safety-tested for cumulative exposure and compounding toxicity.

There is no licensed COVID-19 vaccine for children under 12 but the CDC insists pediatricians push new COVID jabs on babies

It is important to note that as of now, there are no licensed COVID-19 vaccines available for children under 12. The CDC is recommending babies be subject to vaccines that are currently in development and have a track record of causing health problems, instead of preventing them.

The vaccines currently recommended for babies are only authorized under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This status means that these vaccines have not undergone the full licensing process and are subject to a lower standard of evidence compared to licensed products, which have an abysmally low standard of evidence to begin with.

With these recommendations, the CDC appears to be acting in a diabolical manner yet again. The newer versions of the COVID-19 vaccines have not demonstrated safety and efficacy beyond what earlier versions showed. The entire vaccine experiment on humanity is spiraling out of control, yet the beleaguered federal agencies refuse to halt this predatory machine that sacrifices human health for pharmaceutical profits.

Of course, the government promotes COVID vaccines as “safe and effective” for babies, just like the rest of the childhood vaccines

Albert Benavides, an analyst of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), has raised alarms about the reporting and transparency of vaccine-related adverse events. VAERS has recorded over 37,000 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination, though many of these reports have vague details about age and the precise nature of the adverse events. Benavides suggests that these figures are being under-reported.

Despite the evidence of mass harm, the CDC continues to assert that the COVID-19 vaccines are “safe and effective.” Still promoting dangerous and potentially life-threatening propaganda, the agency emphasizes that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of COVID-19, particularly in preventing severe disease and complications.

Subversively, the communication strategy for promoting EUA vaccines differs from licensed vaccines. For EUA products, fact sheets provided by the vaccine manufacturers detail the risks and benefits, but these are not required to be shared with patients in the same way that Vaccine Information Statements (VIS) are required for licensed vaccines. For EUA COVID-19 vaccines, the CDC directs people to “fact sheets” that are produced by the vaccine manufacturer, with no third-party holding the manufacturer accountable and no objective analysis of the risks and the lack of benefits.

Pfizer’s own fact sheet for its COVID-19 vaccine acknowledges that EUA products have not undergone the same rigorous review as FDA-approved products. After experimenting with these products on the population, and being forced by the courts to turn over initial risk data, Pfizer and the FDA has begrudgingly admitted on those fact sheets that side effects such as myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported. This is a serious risk. In Japan’s pharmacovigilance system, fatality rates for myocarditis and pericarditis can be as high as 9.6%.

Whether its an EUA product or fully-licensed product, the CDC always propagates the messaging put forth by the vaccine manufacturer. For instance, the first statement on the CDC’s “6 Things to Know about COVID-19 Vaccination for Children” says, “COVID-19 vaccination for children is safe.” This blatant lie should call into question every vaccine on the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule. Why haven’t these childhood vaccines – a list of injections that continues to grow out of control – been subject to double-blind, placebo-controlled studies?

In a way, the COVID-19 vaccine fraud has broken open a dam of lies, causing more parents around the country to question a system that is deceiving and harming the public, and as many are finding out, has pushed lies and false guilt on parents for years.

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• CDC.gov
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com
• ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Adding Monkeypox to her target list is a good thing for the rest of us. Even those outside of the EU can benefit from her access to information we simply cannot see. Her willingness to speak the truth has made her anathema amongst her peers, but it has endeared her to the people of the world. Here’s her letter to us…

Dear fellow citizens,

The following text contains some premium conspiracy theories on the subject of “monkeypox”. At least that’s what those who believe in what the TV tells them would claim. But because almost all of the old conspiracy theories have come true in the meantime, we are now getting a new supply:

As you probably know, the WHO has already issued the highest global health alert for monkeypox (Mpox) last week, although the spread is only limited to some regions of Africa.

You probably also know that a simulation game on the topic of “monkeypox” took place at the Munich Security Conference in 2021. One of the participants was Jeremy Farrar, the then director of the billion-dollar health foundation “Wellcome Trust” (funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, among others). As luck would have it, Farrar has been Chief Scientist at the WHO since last year.

At the end of 2023, BioNTech enters into a strategic partnership with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). CEPI was founded in Davos in 2016 (WEF sends its regards) and is an alliance of the WHO, the EU Commission, individual governments, pharmaceutical companies, (private) donors and foundations. The “Wellcome Trust”, the Gates Foundation and the UN stand out in the 2024 investor overview.

In May 2024, BioNTech and CEPI announced that they are expanding their portfolio for mRNA vaccines – including vaccines against Mpox. At the same time, the monkeypox vaccine “Imvanex” from “Bavarian Nordic” is already being produced in Denmark and is the only one to be approved in both the EU and the USA.

So much for the crystal-clear facts. If you want to find out more, here is a good place to start: https://www.achgut.com/artikel/kleines_affenpocken_puzzle

In the meantime, during my own research, I came across further, rather disturbing information:

Did you know that the Austrian Red Cross (Tyrol section) for example, is now looking for new employees for vaccination centers? The tasks include managing patient flows, preparing barcodes and vaccination certificates as well as carrying out mobile vaccinations. Applicants are expected to be “assertive”, among other things. From the end of September, the new employees will receive a gross salary of around €2,450 per month at their place of work in Vienna. https://archive.is/l9CDN

BioNTech previously announced in the German business newspaper Handelsblatt that they expect 90 percent of their total sales to be generated by the end of 2024. https://archive.is/Hhptk

Currently, BioNTech is building its first commercial African vaccine factory in Rwanda. The focus here also includes mRNA vaccines against Mpox. Some old acquaintances traveled to the opening: EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock gave themselves the dubious honor. Incidentally, Germany is supporting the development of the vaccine production in Rwanda with almost 36 million euros of German taxpayers’ money. https://archive.is/2Fcqd

Dear readers, do you believe in coincidences?
I DO NOT!

Kind regards,
Yours, Christine Anderson, MEP

First started in September 2021, the CDC’s Genomic Surveillance Program was created to track travelers, which the federal agency considers to be “an especially important group to consider when tracking new and emerging infectious disease.”

After the program was launched in the fall of 2021 at just three U.S. airports, the expectation in the coming months was that the program would be disbanded since COVID ended. Instead of shutting the program down, the CDC instead expanded it nearly threefold.

The CDC announced that it would be placing “public health professionals” at the eight airports, including John F. Kennedy International in New York; Newark Liberty International in New Jersey; San Francisco International in California; and Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International in Georgia.

“We wanted to achieve several things: to get the platform set up at three airports, gauge the level of participation, and determine if we could detect variants using pooled sampling,” said Cindy Friedman, chief of the Travelers’ Health Branch of the CDC’s Genomic Surveillance Program.

“We achieved our goals and showed proof of concept.”

(Related: Did you catch the CDC study showing that heart disease risk skyrockets by 13,200 percent following COVID injections?)

First it’s voluntary; then it becomes mandatory — at gunpoint

In partnership with XpresCheck, an airport-based company that provides COVID “testing,” and Concentric by Ginkgo, a network of more than 60 laboratories with genetic sequencing capability, the CDC hopes to continue probing travelers’ nasal cavities and other orifices in search of COVID germs.

The CDC did it with the “omicron” (moronic) strain and others, and now believes it can do it with whatever further mutations COVID presents, probably around Election Day.

For now, the program is “voluntary,” allowing individual samples to be collected from “participating” travelers who are allowed to remain “anonymous.” Precisely what the CDC is doing with the samples after it collects them remains unknown.

“It started voluntary in China, too, until it wasn’t,” warned someone on X. “Then they welded apartment buildings shut, forced people to get vaccinated at gunpoint, and hauled everyone else into isolation concentration camps where they were only allowed to be released if they paid a bribe. They even killed every pet in Shanghai.”

This same X account, by the way, noted ties between Donald Trump and his running mate JD Vance and the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, BlackRock and Peter Thiel.

“Vance’s companies deal with gene therapies, mRNA, and young blood,” this person added.

“There are so many reasons why I refuse to fly anymore, but if I were still flying and they made this mandatory, I’d be done for sure,” wrote another.

Someone named “Jo Christiansen” (@JoChristianse13) retold the ugly story of what Andrew Cuomo did to New York during the COVID “pandemic.”

“Back when Cuomo was trying to introduce contact tracing in New York state, he put the National Guard at JFK on the pretext of them asking travelers what their movements were,” Christiansen wrote.

“I saw them there as I came through, but I never saw them approaching travelers and the contact tracing was never instituted. I don’t think anybody downloaded the app.”

“These psychos collecting airplane toilet wastewater for testing is just sick,” wrote another about the CDC’s weird obsession with human bodily fluids, which it eagerly wants to collect from wherever in order to “test” it for “COVID.”

If the CDC is in charge of it, you can be sure it has nothing to do with improving the health of you or your family. Learn more at CDC.news.

Sources for this article include:

• X.com
• CDC.gov
• NaturalNews.com

Redfield’s admissions came during a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on government oversight of taxpayer-funded high-risk virus research.

The late admission of vaccine injuries underscores the failure of public health agencies and the medical establishment to provide informed consent to the billions of vaccine recipients worldwide.

“It’s important that he is telling the truth now,” vaccine researcher Jessica Rose, Ph.D., told The Defender. “Adverse events were hidden and still are being hidden to prevent injection hesitancy.”

Redfield, who led the CDC from 2018 to 2021, didn’t stop there. He declared biosecurity “our nation’s greatest national security threat,” calling for a halt to gain-of-function research pending further debate.

The hearing, which featured contentious exchanges between senators and witnesses, also touched on controversial topics such as the COVID-19 origins lab-leak theory and allegations that health agencies suppressed data.

mRNA vax ‘should have been open to personal choice’

During the hearing Redfield, who oversaw the CDC during the crucial early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, elaborated on his recent statements about mRNA vaccine safety.

“I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating these vaccines,” Redfield said. “They should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice.”

Redfield went further, admitting that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is “toxic to the body” and triggers “a very strong pro-inflammatory response.”

He noted that in his own medical practice, he doesn’t administer mRNA vaccines, preferring “killed protein vaccines” instead.

Redfield’s statements stand in stark contrast to the CDC’s official stance during his tenure, which strongly promoted mRNA vaccine uptake as safe and effective.

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pressed Redfield on the issue, highlighting concerning data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Johnson presented figures showing over 37,000 deaths reported following COVID-19 vaccination, with 24% occurring within two days of injection.

Redfield acknowledged there was “not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines.” He criticized attempts to “underreport any side effects because they argued that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated.”

I truly appreciated Dr. Redfield’s honesty at the hearing today. pic.twitter.com/X06znrxe12

— Senator Ron Johnson (@SenRonJohnson) July 12, 2024

‘FDA should release all of the safety data’

Redfield’s criticism of data withholding extended beyond vaccine side effects. He expressed disappointment in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration‘s (FDA) handling of vaccine safety information.

“The FDA should release all of the safety data they have,” Redfield said. “I was very disappointed to hear that they were planning to hold on to that until 2026. That really creates a sense of total lack of trust in our public health agencies towards vaccination.”

Johnson echoed these concerns, revealing his frustration with the lack of follow-through by health agencies and the committee itself.

“I’m not getting cooperation out of the chairman of the permanent subcommittee investigation to issue subpoenas to get this,” Johnson said, referring to unreleased data and documents.

The senator displayed a chart comparing adverse event reports for various drugs, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, to those for COVID-19 vaccines. The stark contrast in reported deaths from these therapeutics — with COVID-19 vaccines showing significantly higher numbers — fueled Johnson’s demand for more transparency.

“As important as the cover-up of the origin story is, there’s a lot more that’s being covered up,” Johnson asserted. “The public has a right to know. We pay for these agencies. We pay their salaries. We fund these studies.”

Redfield agreed with Johnson’s assessment, stating that withholding the information is “counterproductive.”

Redfield doubtful of ‘any benefit from [gain-of-function] research’

Redfield’s testimony took another controversial turn when he called for a pause on gain-of-function research, experiments that involve making pathogens more infectious or deadly.

“I’m not aware of any advanced therapeutic or vaccine that has come to pass because of gain-of-function research,” Redfield said. “I do think there has to be a very aggressive debate of whether there’s any benefit from that research.”

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) seized on this point, introducing his Risky Research Review Act. The bill aims to establish an independent board within the executive branch to oversee federal funding for high-risk life sciences research.

“If the Risky Research Review Act had been in place, it might have prevented the COVID-19 pandemic,” Paul said, citing Redfield’s endorsement.

MIT’s Kevin Esvelt, Ph.D., inventor of a technique for rapidly evolving proteins and other biomolecules who was also instrumental in developing CRISPR gene-editing technology, reinforced these concerns.

Highlighting gaps in current oversight, he described an experiment where his team — with FBI approval — successfully ordered DNA fragments of the 1918 influenza virus from 36 of 38 providers.

“Everything that we did and the companies did was entirely legal,” Esvelt said, underscoring the potential for misuse. “There are no laws regulating DNA synthesis, even though the industry group, the International Gene Synthesis Consortium, has requested congressional regulation.”

The hearing revealed a growing consensus among witnesses for stricter oversight of potentially dangerous research, with Redfield suggesting such studies should be “highly regulated” to protect national security.

Redfield reaffirms COVID lab-leak theory

The hearing reignited debate over the origins of COVID-19, with Redfield reaffirming his belief in the lab-leak theory.

“Based on my initial analysis, I believe then, and I still believe today, that the COVID infections were the direct result of a biomedical research experiment and subsequent lab leak,” Redfield stated.

This assertion led to a heated exchange between Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Carrie Wolinetz, Ph.D., former chief of staff to then-director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Francis Collins. Hawley accused NIH officials of deliberately suppressing the lab-leak theory.

“Your office, Dr. [Anthony] Fauci and others tried to actively censor them,” Hawley said. “There was a propaganda effort that this paper was the center of, and now everybody says, ‘Oh, well, we just weren’t sure at the time.’”

Hawley referred to the 2020 “Proximal Origin” paper that argued against the lab-leak hypothesis.

Wolinetz defended the NIH’s actions. “I do not believe censorship took place, sir.” She maintained that discussions about the virus’s origins were part of normal scientific discourse.

Redfield, however, criticized the lack of thorough investigation into both natural origin and lab-leak hypotheses. “Unfortunately, this didn’t happen,” he said, adding that four years later, he believes there’s no meaningful evidence supporting a natural origin.

The former CDC director also revealed that he did not learn about concerning biodistribution studies of the vaccine’s lipid nanoparticles until as late as the summer of 2021, suggesting a delay in critical information reaching top health officials.

‘Biosecurity is our nation’s greatest national security threat’

Redfield emphasized the critical importance of biosecurity in national defense.

“In 2024, 2025, biosecurity is our nation’s greatest national security threat,” Redfield stated. “You need to think of it the same way we thought about the verge of nuclear atomic [sic] in the late 40s, 50s, and 60s.”

He called for a proportional response to the threat, suggesting the creation of a dedicated agency within the U.S. Department of Energy to address biosecurity concerns.

“We have a $900 billion Defense Department for the threat of China, North Korea and Russia,” Redfield noted. “We don’t have really any systematic agency or network of private sector contractors to help us with the biosecurity threat.”

Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) echoed this sentiment. “In my humble mind, a viral biosecurity issue is a bigger issue than China’s military threat to us.”

Gerald Parker, DVM, Ph.D., associate dean for Global One Health at Texas A&M University, supported the call for enhanced oversight, recommending “an independent authority to consolidate secure functions in a single entity with a dedicated mission.”

The hearing also touched on the potential for future pandemics, with Redfield repeating his warnings about the potential spread of H5N1 bird flu.

As the hearing concluded, senators from both parties expressed concern over the lack of transparency and oversight in high-risk research.

Paul summarized the sentiment: “We cannot stand idly by. We must demand accountability, strive for transparency and ensure the safety of our citizens is never again compromised by negligence or deceit.”

Watch the July 11 hearing: ‘Risky Research’:

The agency also redacted how multiple children were diagnosed with Kawasaki Disease after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, according to the documents.

The Epoch Times obtained more than 1,400 pages of emails from the CDC concerning its Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project, which analyzes post-vaccination problems reported by health care providers. The tranche included numerous redactions.

While redactions are allowed under the Freedom of Information Act, there were signs that too much information was being hidden.

The Epoch Times appealed some of the redactions.

The CDC agreed to remove some of them, revealing what the agency initially shielded.

In one email, a provider reports a 30-year-old woman who suffered chest pain and leg twitching following COVID-19 vaccination. The original copy of the email stated in part that she “got vaccine due to [redacted].”

In the updated copy, the CDC removed the redaction, showing that the woman received a vaccine because of a mandate at work.

Several other portions of the emails that are now unredacted show the CDC hid how multiple children, including a 2-year-old, were said to have suffered from a serious inflammatory illness called Kawasaki Disease shortly after receiving a shot.

One girl suffered inflammation around the eyes, swollen lips, high fever, and a rash, and “was admitted last week with Kawasaki,” one of the girl’s parents wrote on Dec. 5, 2021, the new documents show. She received a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine two weeks prior.

Dr. Matthew Oster is a cardiologist who works for the CDC.

“The biggest question, of course, here, is whether this was truly [redacted] or whether this was [redacted] related to the vaccine,” Dr. Oster wrote after hearing about the case.

The cleaner copy of the email showed that the redactions covered “KD,” or Kawasaki Disease, and “MIS-C,” or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.

“We do now have a small number of cases like this one,” Dr. Oster said.

The CDC has portrayed MIS-C as only being caused by COVID-19, but studies have found that there were MIS-C cases before the COVID-19 pandemic and that some people suffered the syndrome after vaccination without evidence of COVID-19. The CDC says on its website that the agency is “investigating reports of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which may present with Kawasaki disease-like features.”

Another email originally hid the age of a male child and what his doctor suspected he suffered after receipt of a second dose of Moderna’s vaccine.

The boy was 2 years old, the newly obtained documents show, when he was admitted with what a pediatric infectious disease doctor suspected was “atypical Kawasaki Disease.” The documents show that the doctor also considered MIS-C as a diagnosis in light of how the boy’s sister tested positive for COVID-19 on the same day the boy started showing symptoms of fever, although multiple COVID-19 tests on the boy returned negative.

The doctor said he had a “low suspicion” for a COVID-19 vaccine reaction but still submitted a report to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which the CDC helps run.

Kawasaki Disease was detected as a safety signal for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines among children aged 5 to 11 when the CDC first ran an analysis on VAERS data in 2022, according to files previously obtained by The Epoch Times. The analysis did not include children younger than 5. Kawasaki disease after COVID-19 vaccination has been reported in the literature, although a study on patients with a history of the disease who contracted COVID-19 or were vaccinated uncovered no signs of problems.

An internal CDC message, now fully unredacted, showed that an official described there being “another CISA ‘inquiry’ about a child with atypical Kawasaki Disease.” Another official said the reports were “very rare” while a third said the normal CDC processes were sufficient to monitor for the disease post-vaccination “unless there’s a specific ask or data need.”

Other removed redactions show that:

• A person reporting symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination was reporting that the symptoms included Coxsackievirus and that he himself was the patient. The provider wrote, “I … don’t know whether to fear another vax more or less than the risk of infection.”
• A patient who was reported as suffering heart inflammation after a third Pfizer dose, and came back with the inflammation one year later, was 17 and a male.
• The CISA expert who said the woman who suffered chest pain could get additional vaccine doses was Dr. Oster. Previously disclosed emails showed the program repeatedly said people with post-vaccination symptoms should receive more doses.
• A patient with “intense malaise” and other symptoms about six months after a Pfizer shot had an elevated heart rate, per a portable electrocardiogram, and sinus tachycardia per a cardiology consultation.

Words and phrases that were redacted originally, but not any longer, include “your daughter”, “hospitalist”, “the parents”, “cardiac workup”, “a physician”, “I believe”, “patient was started on a course of Prednisone”, and “does not drink, smoke, or use any drugs.”

Every single email chain for which redactions were protested was returned with at least some redactions cleared.

The original version claimed that the redactions were appropriate under exceptions outlined in the Freedom of Information Act, including an exception that protects “personnel and medical files and similar files” if their disclosure “would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”

A CDC official told The Epoch Times in an email that the agency, after receiving the appeal, conducted a “careful review” and removed some of the redactions. The official did not explain why the CDC wrongly redacted so much information.

The CDC “has provided modified records for the pages listed in your appeal,” an official with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the CDC’s parent agency, told The Epoch Times in an email. Appeals of CDC Freedom of Information Act requests are lodged with the department.

Fits Pattern

Any person can request information through the Freedom of Infection Act (FOIA), and agencies across the government typically redact portions of responsive documents or withhold them entirely. Agencies “often use FOIA exemptions improperly, withholding records simply because they may reveal problems at the agency or just ‘paint the agency in a bad light,’” Melissa Wasser, a lawyer at the Project On Government Oversight, told senators in 2022. People “consistently receive large swaths of arbitrarily redacted information,” she added.

When presented with signs that information was improperly redacted or withheld, people primarily have two options: lodge an appeal or sue.

Both methods have worked to extract information from the CDC during the pandemic.

An Epoch Times appeal in another case, for example, returned a copy that removed significant redactions that were applied to an internal email describing what Pfizer and Moderna told them about studies that were being done regarding heart inflammation and COVID-19 vaccines.

The unredacted information showed that Moderna had not tested samples from vaccine recipients for subclinical myocarditis because it was waiting for a “specific cardiac biomarker [to] be identified.” An outside study from Switzerland later found signs of subclinical heart inflammation in about one out of 35 people.

The CDC acknowledged that the information had been wrongly redacted. It reasoned that the information “cannot be considered confidential” because it was shared before and “is readily available to the public,” although some of the details had never been made public previously.

Among other lawsuits, meanwhile, one led to the release by the CDC of answers from its V-safe surveillance survey while a second prompted the disclosure of what participants wrote in free-text fields after the CDC left off adverse events of special interest from the survey. Some of the data had never before been described publicly, while other information from the system had only been outlined in CDC-authored studies and presentations.

The 780,000 reports were received shortly after the COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out, and show people experienced a wide range of post-vaccination problems, including heart inflammation, miscarriages, and seizures.

“Loss of consciousness and seizure immediately following injection. Went to ER by ambulance,” one person reported.

“Diagnosed with Bells Palsy today due to left-sided facial numbness and paralysis,” another said.

People lodged the reports with V-safe, a text-message system created by the CDC to monitor for possible side effects of COVID-19 vaccines.

The CDC, for years, declined to make the V-safe data public, instead publishing studies that described the reports as providing reassurance about the safety of the shots. However, according to data released in 2022, nearly 8 percent of the 10 million users required medical attention or hospital care after vaccination, and many others reported missing school, work, or other normal activities.

That topline data came from check-the-box surveys.

The same judge who ordered the release of that data ordered the agency in January to disclose free-text entries from a different section where individuals could describe their experiences. U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, appointed by former President Donald Trump, dismissed the government’s arguments that processing the responses and redacting sensitive information would require too much work.

The first two tranches, comprising 780,000 reports from some 523,000 people, include dozens of reports of heart inflammation, hundreds of reports of facial paralysis, and thousands of reports of tinnitus.

“For 24 hrs after [the] shot I was so fatigued I could not stay awake. I also have some very strong suicidal thoughts. Zero appetite,” one individual wrote.

Another person said they experienced symptoms of an allergic reaction. “I read where [sic] this vaccine should not be administered to anyone allergic to PEG and I am allergic to PEG. It would be incredibly reassuring if someone would call me as all I run into is dead ends,” the individual said.

The free-text portion of the surveys was the only place for people to report adverse events, including heart inflammation, even though the CDC knew the shots might cause those events, previously released documents showed. Other documents showed the CDC became aware of the vaccines possibly causing myocarditis, or heart inflammation, and a related condition called pericarditis early in 2021 but hid the knowledge from the public.

Judge Kacsmaryk’s order came in litigation brought by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), a nonprofit that has compelled the release of a number of government files since the COVID-19 pandemic started.

“ICAN had to sue the Centers for Disease Control in order to gain access to the COVID-19 shot V-safe adverse event data, which is yet another shameful chapter in the decades-long history of federal health officials trying to cover up vaccine risks by ignoring patterns of vaccine reaction symptoms in reports made to the government,” Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, told The Epoch Times after reviewing the new data.

“When people report the same symptoms over and over again after getting a biological product—in this case ’shortness of breath‘ and ’heart palpitations,’ which are both symptoms of myocarditis that has been causally linked to mRNA COVID shots—the public should be warned, not kept in the dark. It raises questions about what else government health officials are hiding,” she added.

The free-text entries are not dated. Elizabeth Brehm, an attorney representing ICAN, said the group is seeking the dates of the reports from the CDC. The group does know that the entries are the earliest ones received by the CDC. V-safe was launched as the vaccines were rolled out in late 2020. The rest of the entries are expected to be produced on a rolling basis.

A CDC spokesperson declined to answer many questions, including those related to the dates of entries.

“V-safe participants who reported that they received medical care after vaccination were called and encouraged to submit a VAERS report. If they submitted a VAERS report and the adverse events were classified as serious (as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations), CDC attempted to obtain additional information (medical records, hospital records, etc.) about the reported adverse event,” the spokesperson told The Epoch Times. “All data collected from VAERS is processed and analyzed for unusual patterns or unusually high numbers of rare and serious adverse events after vaccination.”

She said the information from VAERS helped detect problems the agency now acknowledges are caused by the vaccines, including myocarditis.

For decades, the Western Medical Industrial Complex has claimed that all pharmaceutical medications and vaccinations are backed by peer-reviewed clinical studies based on mountains of empirical data.

However, upon closer examination, most of that “research” was conducted only by the manufacturers of those “medicines,” many of whom have conspired to alter and falsify data to justify the conclusions they needed for Food and Drug Administration approval, to maximize profits and to assure the populace it’s all 100 percent “safe and effective.”

COVID-19 clot shots clog the vascular system with millions of prions that cause chronic inflammation, heart strain, turbo cancer and spontaneous miscarriages

What if you found out today that the opposite is true about all the theories and “science” purported by the vaccine makers and the CDC? Would you spread the word? Would you try to sue for damages if you suffered health atrocities due to the spike protein gene therapy injections? What if you lost a baby because of the clot shot jabs? Wouldn’t you want to take a closer look at all the “science” that’s supposedly behind the “safe and efficacy” of all the COVID-19 experimental, emergency use only injections?

A professor and statistician at the University of Lucerne, Dr. Konstantin Beck, studied the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccine in Switzerland and directly linked it to a significant increase in spontaneous abortion among pregnant women. Dr. Beck was a former adviser to the German Minister of Health and the Swiss Parliament, and he analyzed findings from scientific publications, health insurance companies and the Swiss Federal Office of Statistics.

Dr. Beck went on the record saying that vaccine manufacturers and public health officials either knew or could have known this information at the time if they had simply studied the data.

Why won’t the CDC, Pfizer and Moderna recognize these dangers, this scientific research, and warn the American public? Maybe because they don’t want anyone to find out that the COVID clot shots cause a woman’s immune system to attack the fetus and kill it when the virus-mimicking spike proteins travel to the uterus and trick the body.

In another research arena regarding the dangers of the COVID-19 DNA-altering mRNA jabs, Dr. Charles Hoffe, a medical doctor of 28 years in British Columbia, Canada, ran PET/CT scans on cancer patients who had received the Pfizer mRNA booster shot just eight days prior, and found rapid progression of T-cell lymphoma, a dramatic increase of gastrointestinal lesions, and a turbo-effect of spreading of cells in the lymph nodes under the arms near the armpits.

This is called turbo-cancer, where spike proteins from mRNA jabs serve as a carcinogen – literally food that feeds the cancer, propelling it to multiply exponentially to invade the rest of the body. How can this be, you may be asking? The mRNA ingredients literally turn OFF your P-53 gene so your body can no longer fight against cancer.

Top 7 myths about mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” propagated by Big Pharma and the Centers for Disease Continuance (CDC)

• “Vaccination helps prevent severe COVID-19 and the risk of hospitalization”
• “The 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine is safe and recommended for people who are trying to get pregnant and people who are pregnant or are breastfeeding.”
• “The COVID-19 vaccine is safe and recommended for people who have cancer now or who have been treated for cancer.”
• In order to reduce side effects from the vaccine, “You should wait until after being vaccinated to see how you feel.”
• “None of the vaccines interact with or alter your DNA in any way. They cannot cause cancer.”
• “Unvaccinated people should get this vaccine as their very first shot.”
• “You can safely get the flu and COVID-19 shot at the same time”

None of these CDC claims are backed up by clinical research that proves they are valid. In fact, it’s just the other way around. Science studies are now revealing these COVID-19 injections are not vaccines at all, but instructions for cells to produce toxic prions forever, that invade organs, clog the vascular system, cripple the immune system, disturb the central nervous system, and CAUSE cancer and miscarriages. Stick to the facts, not the myths repeated a thousand times over by the talking heads who claim to be “experts,” but who present zero validated science to back up their wild claims.

Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on experimental gene therapy injections that lead directly to vascular clots, hypertension, myocarditis, pericarditis, heart attacks, strokes, PCVS, SPS and Long-Vax-Syndrome.

Sources for this article include:

• MSKCC.org
• NaturalNews.com 1
• NaturalNews.com 2
• Rumble.com
• TheGatewayPundit.com