In a Substack newsletter, Dr. William Makis cited a paper from 2020 (by Juarez et al) on the antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically feasible concentrations where it was found to support its clinical development as a repositioned cancer drug.

According to the study, at a human dose of two mg/kg, ivermectin can achieve anti-cancer effects such as cell cycle arrest (inhibit proliferation), preferential inhibition of cancer stem-like cells, synergize with several chemotherapy drugs and inhibit tumor growth in a breast cancer mouse model.

Ivermectin was tested at two mg/kg/day, translating to roughly 5uM in vitro concentration. They found that the drug goes after cancer stem cells, which tend to be resistant to chemotherapy.

“Ivermectin has a preferential depletion effect on the cancer stem-like cell population,” the authors included in the research. “We observed that among all the evaluated cell lines, a decrease in cell viability and clonogenicity is more evident in the cancer stem-like cells than in their parental population.”

It also found that the most sensitive cancer cell lines were the ovarian, breast, glioblastoma (brain), lung, colon, uterine squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), hepatocellular, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), pancreatic and endometrial.

Meanwhile, the least sensitive were osteosarcoma, gastric and melanoma.

Moreover, lymphoma and leukemia cell lines appear to be more resistant to Ivermectin but the drug has a significant impact on those cells’ ability to form colonies, according to the study. (Related: Ivermectin can “kill cancer cells” and boost immune response, suggest health experts.)

Makis further highlighted that this was the first study he had ever seen that had tested as many as 28 cancer types with ivermectin.

“No wonder it’s hidden from the public,” he commented.

NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN Tested against 28 types of Cancer – which cancers were most sensitive to Ivermectin? Which were least sensitive?

A research group from Mexico investigated Ivermectin in Cancer

Paper: 2020 (Juarez et al) – Antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically… pic.twitter.com/xWhgEBa1uv

— William Makis MD (@MakisMD) August 26, 2024

FDA took down social media posts discouraging ivermectin use for COVID-19 but mainstream media seemed to have missed this

Back in March, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agreed to permanently take down its social media posts urging people to avoid the usage of ivermectin for COVID-19.

One of the pages that the agency has removed was a page that said: “Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? No.” It also took down posts, including one that reads: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

The move was done following a lawsuit with a settlement filed with a federal court in Texas that ordered the agency to delete another page titled “Why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19 within 21 days.”

The article said that ivermectin was neither authorized nor approved to be used to prevent or treat COVID-19 in humans or animals. It also claims that evidence does not support the efficacy of ivermectin against coronavirus.

On June 2, 2022, Doctors Paul Marik, Mary Talley Bowden and Robert Apter filed a lawsuit against the FDA and its secretary Robert Califf, as well as the Department of Health and Human Services and its secretary Xavier Becerra. They accused the FDA of meddling with their capacity to practice medicine. The lawsuit was first turned down on the basis that the FDA has “sovereign immunity.” However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overruled the lower court’s ruling, stating that the “FDA is not a physician” and “even tweet-sized doses of personalized medical advice are beyond the FDA’s statutory authority.”

Ivermectin has long been approved for use in both animals and humans. In cases of humans, the drug is recommended to treat parasitic infections such as river blindness disease, threadworm infestation, tropical eosinophilia, roundworm infestation, whipworm infestation, filariasis (also called elephantiasis) and loiasis.

On X, formerly Twitter, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden wrote: “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”

Moreover, independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr in a tweet said: “The FDA is biased against many low-cost, generic, and/or natural therapies with low-profit potential. Could it be because half its funding comes from Big Pharma?”

Ivermectin is not an exceptional case. The FDA is biased against many low-cost, generic, and/or natural therapies with low profit potential. Could it be because half its funding comes from Big Pharma? https://t.co/LxpqLuvb6A

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) March 22, 2024

Australian politician Craig Kelly also called the FDA “corrupt,” stating that they have “blood on their hands.”

Head over to Cancer.news for more stories, similar to this.

Sources for this article include:

• Makismd.substack.com
• HindustanTimes.com

Let’s take an inside look at some inventions that the media and the medical establishments brag about, that are abusive, unethical and used irresponsibly to destroy people’s lives. Yet, they scream “science!” every time there’s a challenge and justify the creation and use of these “therapies” and “tools” of destruction. This requires careful consideration.

Many consumers, patients, military personnel, and students may not know this, but the following 8 inventions are used for population reduction and medical tyranny

Many inventions are used mainly for evil purposes and the majority of Americans have no clue, thanks to (fake news) mass media, social media, misinformation, big tech and the highly corrupted US regulatory agencies. The inventions that top this list are:

1. Electroshock Therapy
2. Vaccines
3. Chemotherapy
4. Agent Orange
5. DDT
6. Facebook
7. Spike Protein Injections (mRNA)
8. Google – They no longer allow anyone to see natural health information

Electroconvulsive therapy a.k.a. “electroshock therapy” used for the torture of mental patients and prisoners of war

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), a.k.a. “electroshock therapy,” dates back to doctors and psychologists strapping down unwilling patients, attaching electrodes to their skulls, and blasting them with electricity to “shock” their brain into functioning properly, or even just as “research” that also makes doctors feel powerful and sadistic. Prisoners of war have been tortured this way, into revealing secrets and plans. Mental patients and children are tortured in the name of “medicine” and there’s no proof that this “therapy” works available anywhere.

Some ECT supporters call it the “gold standard” of treatment for deep and “stubborn” depression, but it’s crude, archaic and dangerous, to say the least, often causing memory loss, not to mention permanent nervous system and brain damage.

Using electricity to shock the brain into a seizure can result in permanent brain damage, whether by pulses or steady currents. Doctors are delusional who think these ECT-induced seizures are any safer in 2022 than they were a century or two ago.

Doctors try to dismiss and downplay the damaging effects and make up diagnosis saying, it’s just “resetting the brain’s broken circuits,” but a study published in 2012 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, reported a considerable decrease in functional connectivity between the prefrontal lobes and other parts of the brain (similar to parts of the brain destruction that happens from a lobotomy).

Agent Orange, DDT and chemotherapy are all designed by the same chemical Ag giants that poison our produce today with chemical pesticides and insecticides

Ever heard of Bayer or Monsanto? Of course you have. They merged a few years back into one huge chemical conglomerate, much like the IG Farben of the Nazi Regime. These companies create poisons for killing crop pests, burning down vegetation, and destroying human immune systems for cancer “treatment.” These companies function with no regard for human health or our natural environment.

What’s worse, they know their products destroy lives and life in general. They profit off this. It’s part of the business model, and has been for decades and decades. Many of the same chemicals are used for pesticides that are used for herbicides and “chemo.” They breed cancer in humans.

Then there’s Google, a search engine designed to filter out all vital information about natural health and true safety for human well-being. Facebook, a.k.a. “Fakebook,” is another spying tool that’s chock full of misinformation and disinformation about anything having to do with staying healthy or healing using natural remedies. Both Google and Fakebook contribute to the mass-disinformation campaign that hides all of the dangers of being injected with spike proteins.

It’s all part of the depopulation agenda, and these inventions are NOT helping humans evolve or even sustain themselves and our earth.

Stay tuned for more inventions (you’ll want to avoid) that warp our food supply at FoodScience.news.

Sources for this article include:

• NaturalNews.com
• TruthWiki.org
• FreedomMag.org
• NATURAL NEWS