SpaceX Engineer In North Carolina Has Dire Warning: Biden-Harris' FEMA "Actively Blocking Shipments" For Relief  https://t.co/aydr7R3wrd

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) October 4, 2024

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas dropped the bombshell last week: FEMA “does not have the funds” to see Americans through the rest of this Atlantic hurricane season. The federal agency drained the funds by prioritizing taxpayer funds for illegal and legal aliens versus US citizens as the Biden-Harris globalist team rolled out the red carpet to anyone, even terrorists, via the open southern borders.

“Connect the dots, if you can,” Tim Murtaugh, an adviser to former President Trump’s campaign, wrote on X, adding, “DHS says FEMA might not have enough cash to help people through hurricane season. But in 2 years of a new Biden-Harris program, they’ve spent $1 BILLION on housing and other services for migrants.”

Connect the dots, if you can.

DHS says FEMA might not have enough cash to help people through hurricane season.

But in 2 years of a new Biden-Harris program, they’ve spent $1 BILLION on housing and other services for migrants.https://t.co/BUCIKT65urhttps://t.co/YMLe1x4yDZ pic.twitter.com/dDGXeKaRnP

— Tim Murtaugh (@TimMurtaugh) October 3, 2024

Shedding a whole heck of a lot of color on the situation, Savanah Hernandez, a reporter for Turning Point USA, wrote on X that she has uncovered some of the “first looks” inside fully furnished luxury apartments for migrants that received free rent and utilities for two years.

Hernandez wrote in a note on The Post Millennial:

The Brunswick Landing apartments in Maine sparked controversy earlier this year when it was discovered that homeless migrants in the area were getting the opportunity to live in the units rent-free for up to two years. Migrants living in the apartments shared that not only is the rent-free, the utilities are paid and we got an inside look at the furnished apartments that would run the average American about $2,300 dollars. –

FIRST LOOK: Inside the furnished Maine apartments where migrants are getting up to 2 years of free rent & utilities

This apartment is in the same county which received $6.1 mill in funding from the FEMA program that spent $1 billion on housing migrants:pic.twitter.com/W0xIr5uMSy

— Savanah Hernandez (@sav_says_) October 4, 2024

“This apartment is in the same county which received $6.1 mill in funding from the FEMA program that spent $1 billion on housing migrants,” Hernandez pointed out on X.

This apartment, located in Cumberland county, is one of many throughout Maine which is allowing migrants to live rent free for up to two years.

In this video, we also went undercover at Catholic charities Maine where they detailed their plan to continue bringing 150 more…

— Savanah Hernandez (@sav_says_) October 4, 2024

She continued:

LEWISTON-I made my way up to Maine to see how the migrant crisis has affected the area and found migrants from Angola, Somalia and the Congo

While migrants enjoy the area, one resident expressed an uptick in shootings, drugs & crime related to migrants: pic.twitter.com/0s3iy4eg1l

— Savanah Hernandez (@sav_says_) October 3, 2024

Biden-Harris administration has prioritized illegal and legal aliens over citizens. The botched relief response in the US Southeast exemplifies this great failure unfolding in a Katrina-like event.

She also raised critical questions about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and warned against the growing influence of international organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO).

Excess death data ‘literally earthshaking’

As the COVID-19 pandemic progressed, Sampson grew increasingly concerned about the data showing a rise in excess deaths among young and middle-aged adults in Maine.

In March, she decided to take action. Using 2015-2022 Maine all-cause mortality data analyzed by a statistician, she told her colleagues that Maine has since 2020 seen close to an 18% increase in excess deaths among 25- to 64-year-olds.

The spike in excess deaths for 2020 was 6.3% compared to the background rate of about 1.5% from 2015-2020.

Sampson cited the CEO of the One America insurance company, saying he “publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarter of 2021, death in people of working age 18 to 64 was 40% higher than it was before the pandemic.”

“This data was compiled by actuaries who are the mathematical experts insurance companies rely upon,” she said. “A 40% increase in deaths is literally earthshaking. Even a 10% increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event.”

She went on to describe the increasingly common phenomenon of “sudden deaths,” citing examples such as death by heart attack, stroke, meningitis, brain aneurysm, pulmonary embolism, anaphylaxis and asthma.

She encouraged lawmakers to do their own searches. “You will find hundreds, even thousands, of examples. A few years ago, this was unheard of.”

Sampson said the newly coined term “sudden death syndrome (SDS)” was a “silent epidemic” that demanded immediate attention and investigation.

She told lawmakers:

“SDS is an umbrella term. It includes biologically based scenarios describing [the] quick onset of unexpected mortality without prior signs of illness. I’ll repeat: without prior signs of illness.

“Autopsies may be non-conclusive due to the lack of obvious abnormalities. They may also be non-conclusive because we may not be asking the right questions.”

Citing what she called the “shocking” nature of the data, Sampson called for the Maine House to investigate.

“If there is even a chance this data is correct, we have the moral obligation to our children to investigate,” she said. “This data represents a flashing red light.”

However, despite her efforts, Maine lawmakers swiftly rejected Sampson’s joint order, along party lines. “The Democrats could not reject this order fast enough,” she told The Defender.

Two Democratic lawmakers, both doctors, approached her after her speech, wanting to know where she got the data and stating they thought the increased deaths were due to suicides.

In other discussions, Sampson said people didn’t want to believe the data. She encouraged them to “trust but verify” and asked why they were not doing their due diligence to investigate.

“They just shrugged their shoulders,” she said.

“We shut the whole damn state down for 6%,” she said. “What are we doing with almost 18%? As a mother and a grandmother, this entire issue deeply concerns me. I want my children and their children to have long, healthy lives. We need to get to the bottom of this.”

V-safe data ‘a resounding alarm’ on vaccine harms

In addition to her concerns about excess deaths, Sampson also has been a vocal advocate for vaccine safety and transparency.

In a separate action on the House floor on April 3, she presented alarming data from the CDC’s V-safe surveillance system, which tracks adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, and called for a ban on these vaccines.

Sampson began by explaining the significance of the V-safe data, noting that it was collected from over 10 million people who were among the first to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

“These were excited participants, eager for this new novel vaccine,” she said. “They wanted it to be safe and effective. They believed it was a good thing, and therefore would have no incentives to make up their stories.”

She revealed the shocking results of the V-safe data analysis:

“7.7%, or 782,013 people, needed medical attention. Of those 7.7%, 70% needed to be hospitalized or went to the ER or urgent care. Slightly less than 30% needed telehealth care. On average, each person needed medical attention two to three times.

“Additionally, 13% of the individuals reported they were unable to go to work or go to school, and about 12% were unable to perform normal activities.”

Sampson noted another 2.5 million people had to miss school, work or other normal activities. “This means 33% of unique individuals were affected by negative health impacts.”

She also highlighted the concerning symptoms reported in the free-text entries of the V-safe survey, including chest pains, heart palpitations, shortness of breath, tinnitus, menstrual disturbances and miscarriages.

Calling these statistics “a resounding alarm,” Sampson asked her colleagues to halt all COVID-19 vaccinations.

“The data are in — it is not safe and effective,” she said. “And until the federal government removes the liability shield from the vaccine manufacturers, the COVID-19 shot must be removed from the Maine market.”

Sampson told the Defender she once again faced resistance from her colleagues. She described their response as tense and uncomfortable, with many refusing to engage in further discussion or consider the implications of the V-safe data.

Pushback against WHO agenda

As the end of Sampson’s eight-year term limit approaches, she has turned her attention to the WHO agenda and its potential effect on Maine’s sovereignty and self-determination.

On April 11, she warned her Maine House colleagues about the WHO’s proposed pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations, arguing that they would grant the organization sweeping powers to dictate public health policies at the expense of individual states’ rights.

“Did you consent to it?” she asked her colleagues. “I know I didn’t.”

She warned about the critical votes of the World Health Assembly that took place several weeks ago in Geneva, Switzerland, explaining how these policies would be binding to Maine and other states “unless we make a clear declaration they have no authority.”

With the assistance of Dr. Meryl Nass and the information on the Door to Freedom website, Sampson provided her colleagues with a wealth of background information on the WHO’s agenda.

She highlighted specific aspects of the WHO’s agenda that she found particularly concerning, such as the proposed BioHub pathogen-sharing system and the push for nations to develop genetic sequencing labs.

“Does anyone see a problem with this?” she asked. “Is it just me? What about the high risks of lab leaks?”

Sampson said her colleagues “very quickly” voted down this joint order, also.

“It was heart-sickening to watch my colleagues on the other side of the aisle rapidly stand, object, and vote against this motion,” Sampson wrote.

“All I can say is now they are responsible for the information they have heard,” she told The Defender. “It is on the record.”

As Sampson prepares to leave the Maine House of Representatives, she shows no signs of slowing down in her fight for health freedom.

Sampson’s experiences in the legislature have only reinforced her belief in the importance of being a “squeaky wheel” and speaking truth to power, even in the face of overwhelming opposition.

She is spearheading the Maine Education Project, an initiative to expose the failures of the state’s education system and empower parents, teachers and school board members to effect change.

Andrews filed a request with the Maine Revisor’s Office, indicating his desire to file a Joint Order or the appropriate parliamentary mechanism under Mason’s Rules to impeach Secretary of State Shenna Bellows. He criticized the process of appointing Constitutional Officers in Maine, asserting that they are selected by elected Democrat Party insiders through partisan deals in the State House.

In his statement, Andrews emphasized that he aims to impeach Bellows based on the grounds that she is preventing an American citizen, the 45th President of the United States, who has not been convicted of any crime or impeachment, from appearing on the Maine Republican Party ballot in March.

He accused Bellows of displaying hyper-partisanship, asserting that her decision is driven by political motives. Andrews highlighted the importance of upholding the democratic process and criticized the perceived lack of neutrality in Bellows’ actions.

Andrews’ press release cited a social media post in which he characterized Bellows’ decision as “hyper-partisanship on full display” and alleged that it serves her political ambitions.

In response to the controversy, Bellows defended her move during a CNN interview, stating that she carefully reviewed Section Three of the 14th Amendment and interpreted it to include Trump’s engagement in the January 6, 2021, events as an insurrection. She emphasized the weight of evidence indicating an attack on the Capitol and the rule of law.

The decision by Bellows to disqualify Trump from the 2024 primary ballot is part of a broader trend, as similar actions have been taken in other states, including Colorado, referencing the same constitutional clause. The controversy surrounding Bellows’ decision has sparked discussions on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment and its application to individuals who participated in events like the January 6 insurrection.

Article generated from corporate media reports.

According to the Boston Globe:

Maine’s Democratic secretary of state on Thursday removed former President Donald Trump from the state’s presidential primary ballot under the Constitution’s insurrection clause, becoming the first election official to take action unilaterally in a decision that has potential Electoral College consequences.

While Maine has just four electoral votes, it’s one of two states to split them. Trump won one of Maine’s electors in 2020, so having him off the ballot there should he emerge as the Republican general election candidate could have outsized implications in a race that is expected to be narrowly decided.

The decision by Secretary of State Shenna Bellows follows a December ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court that booted Trump from the ballot there under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Colorado is a Democratic-leaning state that is not expected to be competitive for Republicans in November.

Let’s be perfectly clear about something that corporate media keeps bringing up. They say Trump wouldn’t win in Colorado anyway. They’re saying he might get 1 electoral vote in Maine. None of that matters. This is an attack on our Constitutional Republic regardless of whether a state leans red or blue. Voters should have the final say and taking away their protected right to vote for eligible candidates is disgraceful.

Shenna Bellows is a mediocre person and a stain on our nation. Everyone in Maine, Republican or Democrat, should be appalled. The entire country should be.

Sound off about this story on my Substack.

State requirements vary, but they’re usually only high enough to prevent unserious candidates from throwing their names on the ballot for the sake of novelty. This is why former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie should be ashamed for failing to get the 2,000 signatures required to be on the Maine primary ballot. And he didn’t miss it by a few names. He only collected 844 in-state signatures.

Adding insult to injury, Doug Burgum and Ryan L. Binkley both collected the required signatures and will appear on the Maine ballot.

Who is Ryan L. Binkley?

He's a presidential candidate who got enough signatures to appear on the Maine GOP Primary Ballot.

Why is he relevant?

He's not, but at least he was able to get enough signatures, which Chris Christie was unable to do.

— Prepper Beef (@PrepperNaturals) December 3, 2023

The campaign is blaming “procedural issues” while claiming they actually got over 6,000 signatures. But here’s the thing. If someone is so incompetent that they could make such a basic error, how can they expect to be taken seriously while running for President of the United States?

The answer to that question is obvious. Nobody takes Chris Christie seriously. I doubt Chris Christie takes Chris Christie seriously. He was ordered by someone, likely members of the UniParty Swamp or their globalist puppet masters, to enter the race with a single purpose: To lob zingers at Donald Trump during debates. To be fair, lobbing insults during debates is one of the very few things Christie actually does pretty well.

Fortunately for America, Trump rightly decided not to degrade himself by attending any of the pointless debates. This decision rendered Christie’s candidacy even more irrelevant that it was before. It’s time for him to find a donut shop, call a press conference, and drop out of the race. Afterwards, he can have his donuts and leave us in peace.

Before we begin, it’s important to note that I generally do NOT go down the “false flag” or “psyop” route on mass murder stories. It’s not because I dismiss the possibility of these incidents being manufactured. On the contrary, I am fairly certain many of them are. But unless a story sticks out like a sore thumb as having Deep State connections like the JFK Assassination or the Las Vegas Mass Murders of 2017, I know the chances of us getting close to the truth are practically nil.

In the case of Robert Card and the Maine Mass Murders, I believe the totality of inconsistencies and odd narratives makes it worthy of being questioned, discussed, and independently investigated.

Body Found in the One Place Police Should Have Been Watching the Most

Card’s body was found by police around 7:15 Friday night at the recycling facility where he was recently fired. There are conflicting reports about whether his body was found in a dumpster or a trailer. Either way it doesn’t match what we would expect from someone who had just committed a highly visible mass murdering spree before evading police.

If he wanted to die near his former employers, one would think he wouldn’t crawl into a dumpster or a trailer bed to do it. And if it was a dumpster as the initial local media report below indicates, this would be the first time I’ve heard of someone climbing into a dumpster before shooting themselves. On the other hand, it’s pretty common for bodies of murder victims to be found in dumpsters or hidden in trailers.

As a general rule, dumpsters and trailers are not easily confused with one another. Even though most corporate media are reporting his body was found in a trailer, it seems more likely that the local news reporter with local connections would have the more accurate report, especially when it’s probably that she didn’t get the memo from the powers-that-be about the official trailer narrative. The big question, of course, is why police wouldn’t be staking out the place that Card may have hated the most.

Two Gunshot Wounds to the Head, Then Story Quickly Revised

The first bit of news is not always the most accurate, but it’s hard to imagine someone miscounting the number of wounds to a suspect’s head. That seems to be the case with a report from Daily Mail yesterday that initially indicated two gunshot wounds to the head before the story was revised down to one.

Maine Mass Murderer Found Dead With TWO Gunshot Wounds to the Head . . . But the Story Has Now Changed

As some have rightly noted, it’s possible that a self-inflicted gunshot could create both an entry and exit wound. Higher caliber bullets at point-blank range can cause extreme damage, making it challenging to determine the sources of wounds without thorough examination by the coroner. Still, the obvious implication here is that if there were two gunshot wounds to the head, it would very difficult for the powers-that-be to sell the suicide narrative.

They Searched the Area Before But Strangely the Owner Remembered He Had More Land Days Later

This is the part that made the least sense to me and rang the loudest alarm bells. Police thoroughly searched the recycling company’s property before, but strangely they were called out to search another property that the owner had somehow forgotten to mention before. According to Breitbart:

Sauschuck explained that the trailers at the recycling company were full of metal and that law enforcement believed they had searched and cleared all the trailers early on. However, on Friday, the owner of the of the recycling company contacted law enforcement to say more trailers were on the company’s adjoining property, and when Maine State Police cleared those trailers, Card’s body was discovered.

If a former employee that you had fired had just gone on a mass murdering spree and police are there to search the property, it’s a very safe conclusion to believe the owner would want the entire property searched. For the owner to remember days later that he had another property with more places for Card to hide is about as believable as thinking Covid came from bat soup.

Friday Night News Drop

Nobody can control when a real news story is going to happen, but when the “news” story is being manufactured, it can be dropped at the most appropriate time. IF the powers-that-be manufactured this mass murder and IF they wanted to mitigate scrutiny on a suspicious story like this one, they’d drop it on a Friday night. That’s when news is dropped that’s intended to die.

In this case, I’ve found very few outlets even among conservative and alternative news sites that are truly entertaining the idea that some or all of the Robert Card story is hogwash. Maybe more will pick it up on Monday but by then the vast majority of Americans will have moved on. Perhaps they already have.

Signs of a Deep State Operation

We’ve been told that Card had mental health issues. We know he was extremely well-trained in firearms and even trained others. We know the places he targeted were hand-selected. Lastly, we know that all of this is happening at a time when gun grabbers needed a boost following the selection of a new Speaker of the House.

It has Deep State potential. Card is ideal to be their patsy. The “right-wing-extremist-snapped” protocol seems to be in motion. Then, there’s the hearing aid that made him hear voices, as the Independent reported:

“I have known Rob my whole life,” Card said on Thursday. “He is quiet but the most loving, hardworking, and kind person that I know. But in the past year, he had an acute episode of mental health, and it’s been a struggle.”

She explained that her brother-in-law had begun wearing hearing aids and was convinced he could hear people talking about him at the two locations of the shooting.

“He truly believed he was hearing people say things,” she said. “This all just happened within the last few months.”

The CIA has been known to use the most advanced methods to push and even control people. Are they tapped into our hearing aids now too?

One last note pertaining to psyops/false flags/Deep State events: A few people have noted that pictures of Card compared to pictures of the mass murderer during the shootings themselves seem to depict different people. My amateur examination says it’s possibly him, possibly not.

As a rational guy, I’ll acknowledge that the most likely scenario is that a mentally ill man killed a lot of people, then killed himself, and that the inconsistencies and odd series of events were just consequences of the rush to get the story out. Then again, I’m also one who believes there are no coincidences so it’s a best practice to question the official narratives surrounding the Maine Mass Shootings.

What do you think? Sound off about this story on my Substack.