A group called the “Pro-Choice Majority 2024” sent messages like the following all the way up to the moment the polls closed:

“Kamala SINKING in Pennsylvania: 46% – 48% We need your help!!! RUSH $20 TO DEFEAT DONALD TRUMP NOW! go.prochoicedems.io/1105b4”

“If we can’t raise $20,000 to Pro-Choice Majority before polls close in just HOURS, we may as well hand Trump a victory and he’ll END reproductive freedoms FOREVER.”

“So our generous donors UNLOCKED a 400%-MATCH on all donations to Pro-Choice Majority to help DEFEAT Trump & SAVE reproductive rights!”

As you can see, the general message was clear: send us all your money, otherwise Trump will win and stop you from getting an abortion. Clearly the target audience was younger women donors, many of whom were duped into sending their money to the fake PAC.

Pro-Choice Majority 2024 spent ZERO DOLLARS opposing Trump, supporting Kamala

The whole charade was a bait-and-switch devised at the last minute – Pro-Choice Majority 2024 was formed in January of this year, after all. The group successfully raised more than $3.6 million, with most of the money being spent on consultants and fundraisers.

Records from the Federal Election Commission (FEC) show that Pro-Choice Majority 2024 spent exactly zero dollars on the things it texted Democrat donors about, including “opposing Trump” and “supporting Harris.”

“The group did not make any transfers to the Harris campaign, either,” notes investigative reporter Lee Fang. “Instead, much of the group’s funds flowed to Mothership Strategies, a D.C. firm founded in 2015 by former Democratic Party staffers.”

Mothership Strategies employs fundraising tactics so aggressive that many probing eyes have begun scrutinizing the group. Mothership Strategies is tied to a host of Democratic PACs from which it extracted nearly $50,000 over the past several years for advising the Democrat Party about Kamala’s campaign.

“That total does not include the money spent over the last few weeks given the FEC’s quarterly disclosure schedule,” Fang notes. “It is likely to be much higher.”

“Many of the PACs tied to Mothership Strategies similarly used alarmist messages demanding donations to defeat Trump yet funneled vast sums of donor money back to consulting firms.”

The closer America got to Election Day, the more money Mothership Strategies started receiving from the likes of the Stop Gun Violence PAC, which paid it nearly half a million dollars based on a pitch to donors that money was needed “to BAN Trump from running for office.” More than two-thirds of the total cash received by the Stop Gun Violence PAC was ultimately paid to consultants, the largest of which is Mothership Strategies.

The Vote PAC is another that appealed for cash from donors for specious reasons including “to demand Congress invoke the 14th Amendment to BAN Marjorie Taylor Greene from Congress.” Based on this phony claim, the Democrat PAC pulled in at least $5.6 million.

The Trump administration now has a lot of work to do uncovering and holding accountable all this election corruption. Even though he won the election over Kamala, the type of corruption now being exposed on the Democrat side of the aisle shows that America’s election system is in major need of reform.

The latest post-election news can be found at Rigged.news.

Sources for this article include:

• LeeFang.com
• NaturalNews.com

The study, funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research in New Delhi and conducted between September 2021 and May 2023, focused on potential post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (PCVS) and its impact on the quality of life (QoL) among Indian adults aged 18 and above who received either Bharat Biotech’s COVAXIN or the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. (Related: Australian actress sues AstraZeneca for life-threatening vaccine injury, but continues to ADVOCATE for other COVID-19 “vaccines.”)

According to study authors Yogendra Shrestha and Rajesh Venkataraman from the Department of Pharmacy Practice, Sri Adichunchanagiri College of Pharmacy, 52.8 percent of the vaccine recipients experienced at least one PCVS a month after their first vaccination. Shockingly, this number increased to 64.6 percent at the 12-month mark. Overall, the PCVS was higher among vaccinated individuals with AstraZeneca (65.59 percent) compared to COVAXIN (59.4 percent).

Notably, individuals who opted for booster shots revealed even higher rates of PCVS, with over 80 percent reporting complications. This contrasts sharply with the unvaccinated group, where only 50 percent reported a similar syndrome. In other words, the occurrence of PCVS decreases over time but increases after booster shots. The QoL improves over time but declines after boosters.

Furthermore, the authors noted that discussions about the impact of immunization on people with long-term COVID have led to varying opinions.

“Some evidence indicates a change in, an improvement in, a continuation of, or even a worsening of long-term COVID-19 symptoms following vaccination. The ratio of change in antibody titers was noticeably larger in the group of people whose illnesses became worse.”

CDC still recommends COVID-19 vaccines despite evidence of adverse effects from several studies

This controversial study adds to a growing body of research suggesting potential health complications associated with COVID-19 vaccinations.

A March review, published in the National Library of Medicine, analyzed 81 articles confirming cardiovascular complications in 17,636 individuals who had received an mRNA vaccine. The study reported 284 deaths, with thrombosis being a frequent concern associated with mRNA shots.

Pfizer’s vaccine was linked to thrombosis, while Moderna’s vaccine recipients experienced a higher incidence of stroke. Cardiologist Peter McCullough described the findings as a “cardiovascular safety disaster,” questioning public health agencies for the continuous promotion of these vaccines.

In a Substack post on Nov. 11, McCullough emphasized that 284 well-described deaths due to cardiovascular and thrombotic complications should prompt a global recall of the vaccines. The time between vaccination and the onset of symptoms was reported to be 5.6 days for Moderna and 4.8 days for Pfizer.

Moreover, a preprint study published on medRxiv revealed common chronic symptoms among vaccine recipients, including excessive fatigue, brain fog, numbness, neuropathy and exercise intolerance. At least half of the participants, with a median of 22 symptoms, also reported dizziness, burning sensations, tinnitus, headache, insomnia, palpitations and myalgia.

But despite all these concerns, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention still recommends the 2023-2024 updated COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax, even for children as young as six months old. The agency insists that these vaccinations are necessary to protect against serious illness from COVID-19. However, recent government files revealed that over five million COVID-19 infections in 2021 occurred among vaccinated individuals.

Sound off about this story on the End Medical Tyranny Substack.

Learn more about the dangers of COVID-19 vaccines at Vaccines.news. Watch U.K. Member of Parliament Andrew Bridgen calling for the suspension of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the House of Commons.

This video is from the channel The Big Logic channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• CDC knew COVID vaccines killed 163 children and injured 67,622, but still included the deadly shots in childhood immunization schedule.
• Brazil’s socialist government threatens to WITHHOLD welfare payments to parents who REFUSE TO VACCINATE their children against COVID-19.
• Pfizer and Moderna COVID jabs found to be contaminated with short DNA fragments, making them potentially TUMORIGENIC and GENOTOXIC.
• Study: COVID-19 vaccines linked to increased risk of brain clots and stroke when combined with flu vaccines.

Sources include:

• TheEpochTimes.com
• ScienceDirect.com
• Brighteon.com