Just under 75% of the US population receives a fluoridated water supply at a targeted concentration of 0.7 milligrams per liter.

The new research, published in JAMA Network Open, found that this targeted concentration is enough to increase the risk of neurobehavioral issues in children at age three, and that a 0.68 milligram per liter increase in fluoride exposure could double the risk of a child displaying such issues.

Animal studies have consistently shown that high levels of fluoride exposure cause serious changes to neurobiochemical changes, and that fluoride can cross the placental barrier between a mother and her child.

But recent human studies from Mexico and Canada have suggested that even low levels of exposure during pregnancy could be linked to lower IQ, reduced cognitive function and increased symptoms of ADHD.

The new study took 229 mother-child pairs from the Maternal and Developmental Risks from Environmental and Social Stressors (MADRES) cohort, which consists of mainly Hispanic women living in urban Los Angeles, California. The participants were recruited during prenatal care visits between 2015 and 2020.

The researchers took single spot urine samples from the mothers during their third trimester of pregnancy (weeks 29 to 40). The samples were analyzed for urinary fluoride levels, as an index of total fluoride intake. The median urinary fluoride concentration among the mothers was 0.76 milligrams per liter.

When the children reached the age of three years, their mothers completed the Preschool Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), a commonly used measure of children’s cognitive development and behaviour. The CBCL includes 99 items that assess a range of behavioral and emotional problems, from depression and withdrawal to attention problems and aggression, and diagnosable conditions like ADHD and autism-spectrum disorders.

A key finding of the study was that a 0.68 milligram per liter increase in maternal urinary fluoride levels during pregnancy was associated with nearly double the odds of the child scoring in the borderline clinical or clinical range for total neurobehavioral problems.

As well as being associated with an overall increase in the risk of neurobehavioral problems, higher fluoride exposure was also associated with specific issues. A 0.68 milligram per liter increase was associated with a 13.54% increase in scores for emotionally reactive behaviors, for example, and a 19.60% increase in somatic complaints.

There was also an 11.29% increase in anxiety problems and an 18.53% increase in autism-spectrum problems.

“Women with higher fluoride exposure levels in their bodies during pregnancy tended to rate their 3-year-old children higher on overall neurobehavioral problems and internalizing symptoms, including emotional reactivity, anxiety and somatic complaints,” said Tracy Bastain, an associate professor at the University of Southern California and senior author of the study.

“I think this is important evidence, given that it’s the first U.S.-based study and findings are quite consistent with the other studies published in North America with comparable fluoride exposure levels,” added the study’s lead investigator Ashley Malin.

“Conducting a nationwide U.S. study on this topic would be important, but I think the findings of the current study and recent studies from Canada and Mexico suggest that there is a real concern here.”

Yet the CDC, FDA, WHO, and other “medical” organizations claimed from the start that the jabs were safe for pregnant women and encouraged them to get injected as often as possible. Many of us tried to ring the alarm bells, but we were censored and drowned out by “doctors” and “journalists” who were complicit in hiding the truth.

Among the chief vaxx-pushers for pregnant women was CDC Director Rochelle Walensky. She has been notably silent in recent weeks as even corporate media has been forced to acknowledge the jabs are inherently dangerous for pregnant women and preborn babies.

Conservative actor Rob Schneider called her out:

That the United States of America’s @CDC and it’s Director, @CDCDirector Rochelle Walensky pushed and promoted pregnant women to get C19 Vax when the agency KNEW it was causing miscarriages is a crime against humanity. #Nuremberg2

That the United States of America’s @CDC and it’s Director, @CDCDirector Rochelle Walensky pushed and promoted pregnant women to get C19 Vax when the agency KNEW it was causing miscarriages is a crime against humanity.#Nuremberg2 https://t.co/onYdEiu2XP

— Rob Schneider (@RobSchneider) June 1, 2023

Many who have been pushing against the jabs have become complacent with the greatly reduced appetite for people to get injected. But it’s imperative that we continue to spread the word because there are plenty of people out there who have no idea how dangerous the Covid-19 “vaccines” really are.

This is according to Michelle Gershman, a registered nurse who spoke with Dr. James Thorp and members of the organization Children’s Health Defense regarding the connection between the COVID-19 vaccines and fetal death.

Thorp, a veteran obstetrician-gynecologist, described Gershman’s testimony about how pregnant women were “pushed” into an “experimental gene therapy” program as “the most egregious ethical disaster in the history of medicine. It’s an unparalleled disaster.”

“I don’t understand how people just brush it off and pretend it’s not a big deal,” said Gershman. “It’s absolutely a big deal. I do truly believe that babies are given to us by God, they’re meant to bring us love and joy, and if something comes between that, trying to take your baby away, to me that’s absolutely evil.” (Related: HOLOCAUST OF THE UNBORN: Babies are DYING because their mothers got “vaccinated” for COVID.)

Gershman noted that more unborn babies began dying in her hospital right around the spring of 2021, when the COVID-19 vaccines first started being distributed in the United States.

“I already noticed that this increase in fetal demises was happening, but no one was really saying anything about them,” recalled Gershman. “When I started working there, I would see one fetal demise every two or three months. And then when these shots started coming out, we were starting to see them maybe once a week.”

More women and infants started experiencing health complications following rollout of vaccines

Gershman has worked as a postpartum nurse since Nov. 2020, around the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. She noted that the coronavirus did not appear to adversely affect infant mortality or cause any major health issues for most pregnant women.

But starting in spring 2021, when the COVID-19 vaccines started becoming more widespread, Gershman started noticing all kinds of health complications pop up for pregnant women, mostly circulatory problems. These include women who still have high blood pressure even after giving birth and women experiencing blood clots and bursting of blood vessels in the eyes at far higher rates.

Many babies who were born to vaccinated women were unusually fatigued and their faces would come out discolored or even bruised. Many of these newborns had to spend some time in the hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit due to having difficulty breathing.

For months, administrators at Gershman’s hospital refused to address the issue. But by Sept. 2022, a hospital manager finally emailed employees admitting that the number of fetal deaths went from one or two per month to at least 20 each month. Gershman noted that the sudden rise coincided with the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines.

Unfortunately, rather than call for proper approaches on how to save the dying newborns, the hospital manager informed hospital staff to “brush up on your policies” in order to “be able to handle a dead baby.”

“I really think a lot of people are in a trance and they just don’t want to admit that the vaccine could possibly be harming all these moms and babies,” said Gershman. She noted that a lot of people either really do not know or are unwilling to recognize the connection between the COVID-19 vaccines and the rise in reported health complications in hospitals. She believes this is because “so many of them are programed to think that vaccines are good when they’re not.”

Learn more about how the COVID-19 vaccines affect infants at Infanticide.news.

Watch this episode of “The Highwire” as Del Bigtree reports on Michelle Gershman’s testimony regarding the rise in fetal deaths from vaccinated mothers.

This video is from the channel The HighWire with Del Bigtree on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Former Australian MP warns 75% of COVID-19 vaccinated women are experiencing miscarriages.
• Stillbirths are skyrocketing in the post-COVID vaccination era, leaked hospital email reveals.
• Florida OB/GYN warns that infertility and miscarriages have spiked 50% since COVID-19 vaccine rollout.
• OB/GYN says COVID jabs are triggering “massive,” “unprecedented” adverse events in pregnant women, babies.
• Newborn deaths in Scotland reach worrying levels TWICE in six months.

Sources include:

• LifeSiteNews.com
• Live.ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• Brighteon.com
• NATURAL NEWS

The first two hypotheses have been proven and are now accepted by the vast majority of America First patriots as well as awakened citizens across the globe. “Bat soup” has been debunked. Gain-of-function research is demonstrable. Economic turmoil is apparent and after the restrictions were embraced by most politicians in the beginning, only leftist bureaucrats and politicians continued pressing them after the con was exposed.

The third hypothesis has been proven as well, though the acceptance of its reality is far harder to get from the masses than the first two. There are two reasons for this. First, massive censorship and suppression campaigns combined with gaslighting and propaganda have brainwashed far too many into suspending disbelief in the inefficacy and dangers of the jabs. Second, there’s the unfortunate reality that a large majority of people have already been jabbed at least once and are therefore inherently reluctant to accept that they’ve been poisoned.

As Mark Twain is often given credit for saying (though he probably didn’t): “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

This is why we continue to promote every bit of evidence that comes to light as it pertains to the Covid “vaccines” and their role in the depopulation and control agenda. We know there is already tons of evidence out there and the vast majority of readers in our audience are cognizant, but we keep disseminating new studies, data, and analysis to give everyone the tools we need to wake more people up. The fewer people that get jabbed, the better. The fewer times jabbed people get rejabbed, the better.

But even some of you who are fully aware that the jabs are bad are still giving government and other Big Pharma proxies the benefit of the doubt by not acknowledging this as an evil agenda. It’s still popular to blame ignorance, political expediency, or greed on the disinformation they promote. But there’s one important piece of evidence that has been revealed in trickles for the last year as it pertains to both children and pregnant women getting jabbed. The fact that vulnerable children and pregnant women are still getting pushed by the powers-that-be to get injected tells us that most alleged motivations are false.

The powers-that-be cannot blame ignorance because the data is now widely available to everyone, let alone the experts.

We cannot attribute their continued push on political expediency because now would be the perfect time for savvy politicians to announce the new data has made them change their mind. This one is important to understand because timing is everything with reversals in politics. The people are shifting perspectives so it behooves politicians to do so as well. A perfect example of this is the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. When a huge majority of Americans supported the invasions, so too did most politicians. When sentiment shifted among the people, suddenly politicians were coming out admitting they were misled. The same reversal would be happening for Covid jabs given to pregnant women and children if this was about political expediency.

The greed of Big Pharma and those they then bribe to keep their con going is the most common theory used to justify the lies in the minds of those who are waking up. But here’s the thing. If this was about profits, they would NOT be recommending the jabs to pregnant women. The data is crystal clear that these injections do harm to the mother, baby, and both during nursing. This data has been known by Big Pharma since before the jabs were given Emergency Use Authorization. The last thing Big Pharma would risk is exposure of their poisons through vulnerable recipients like pregnant or nursing women if their goals were driven by profits. The tiny percentage of extra jabs they sell for these women would not be worth the huge risk it poses of getting them caught.

There are plenty of accepted and widely distributed drugs and vaccines that are not recommended to pregnant women. The fact that they’re PUSHING these onto as many pregnant and nursing women as possible should prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that greed could not be the primary motivation. Yes, they’re making tons of money so it’s easy to attribute their actions to greed. Yes, most in Big Pharma other than the top executives and globalist pawns THINK they’re doing all of this for the money. But the massive profits are fringe benefits as far as the globalist elite cabal is concerned. Their primary motivation is setting the stage for what’s coming next with The Great Reset.

If we assume ignorance, political expediency, greed, and any other “mainstream” hypotheses are just smokescreens to hide the real agenda behind the jabs, then we must logically assume our “conspiracy theories” about depopulation and controlling the masses are the most likely true motives. If people can get over the intellectual hump of dismissing grand and evil agendas as impossible, then they can start looking at all of the evidence and realizing the powers-that-be are truly working to reduce the population and completely control the remnant.

Here’s an article by Dr. Joseph Mercola that should dispel any lingering notions that the people behind all of this are simply stupid, corrupt, or greedy. Remember, the key to dispelling those motivations is in the risks they’re taking by pushing the jabs on pregnant women and children.

Regression of Humanity, How Big Pharma Is Risking Everything

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• Media are reporting that pregnancy complications have spiked during the COVID pandemic, but claim the cause is unknown
• Most blame the virus itself. But even then, they fail to address the fact that it’s the spike protein that is the most likely culprit. The obvious reason for that is because the spike protein is also what your body produces in response to the COVID shots
• Around the world, women are reporting abnormal menses and vaginal hemorrhaging, both post-COVID and after exposure to the jab or someone who got the shot. Birth rates have significantly dropped, and we’re seeing upticks in preeclampsia, miscarriages, premature births and early puberty, as well as maternal and infant deaths
• Despite the clear risks of vaccinating during pregnancy, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved a whooping cough vaccine for newborns that is given to mothers in the third trimester. This is the first vaccine aimed at infants that is to be preemptively given to the mother during pregnancy
• While U.S. media celebrated the FDA’s authorization of COVID shots for infants under the age of 5 last summer, European countries had long since stopped caring about the pandemic, and the head of public health in Denmark admitted it was a mistake to vaccinate children between the ages of 5 and 11

As soon as it was announced that COVID-19 would be combated with novel mRNA gene transfer technology, a number of scientists spoke out against it with dire warnings about potential health ramifications, including the theory that fertility might be adversely impacted.

In the two years since the rollout of these COVID shots, our worst fears have come true. Still, mainstream media feign surprise. Case in point: The Washington Post recently reported that “Pregnancy complications spiked during the pandemic” and “no one knows exactly why.”¹

Aside from COVID-19 itself, the COVID shots are the only thing that has impacted a vast majority of the population worldwide during this timeframe, and everywhere the same effects are reported. To claim “no one knows why” is to ignore the proverbial elephant in the room as its tail is swatting you in the face and its trumpet sound threatens to shatter your eardrums.

Both Virus and Shots May Have Similar Impacts on Pregnancy

The Washington Post seems to go out of its way to not implicate the COVID shots, laying all the blame on the virus itself. But even then, they fail to address the fact that it’s the spike protein that is the most likely culprit. The obvious reason for that is because the spike protein is also what your body produces in response to the COVID shots.

However, when you read things like, “last fall and winter, Amy Heerema McKenney, a Cleveland Clinic pathologist … began receiving eerily similar reports of stillbirths,” you realize that “last fall and winter” refers to the winter of 2021, not 2020 or 2019.

In other words, we’re talking about a time when most people had received one or more mRNA shots, while the virus itself had mutated into milder forms that were rarely associated with severe blood clotting issues and other anomalies.

That said, it’s by no means impossible that SARS-CoV-2, even in its milder expressions, might have an adverse impact on pregnancy. After all, we’re likely talking about a genetically engineered bioweapon.

The respiratory effects may have mutated to be less severe while other organs may still be more adversely impacted by the spike protein. We also have the “shedding” issue to contend with, so just because a woman is unjabbed doesn’t mean she’s not affected by COVID jab spike protein.

Unique Damage to the Placenta

The Washington Post goes on to describe what McKenney was finding in the winter of 2021:

“Almost as soon as she began looking into [the stillbirths], Heerema McKenney recalled, she became ‘pretty panicked.’ A normal placenta is spongy and dark, reflecting the nourishing blood flowing through it. The ones she was looking at in her lab from the mothers who lost their babies were like nothing she had ever seen before: firm, scarred and more of a shade of tan.

‘The degree of devastation was unique,’ she said. Flipping through case files, she noted that most of the women were in their second trimester, unvaccinated or only partially vaccinated, and infected with the coronavirus within a two-week window before their pregnancies ending.

Heerema McKenney herself saw fewer than 20 potentially coronavirus-related stillbirths over about six months. But her findings matched up with cases colleagues were seeing in other parts of the world.

And they also echoed those in a paper from Ireland that looked at seven cases — six stillbirths and one second-trimester fetal death in pregnant people infected with the coronavirus — resulting from what the authors called ‘a readily recognizable pattern of placental injury.’ She said, ‘That’s when we realized we were all looking at the same thing.’”

While McKenney claims most were either unjabbed or partially jabbed, other evidence clearly implicate the COVID shots. For example, in November 2021, Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, British Columbia (BC), delivered an astonishing 13 stillborn babies in a 24-hour period, and all of the mothers had received the COVID jab.² In a typical month, there may be one stillborn baby at the hospital, making 13 stillbirths in 24 hours highly unusual.

Types of Pregnancy Complications on the Rise

That something is terribly wrong is clear from global statistics. Around the world, women are reporting abnormal menses³ and vaginal hemorrhaging,⁴ both post-COVID⁵ and after exposure to the jab^6,7 or someone who got the shot. Birth rates have significantly dropped, and we’re seeing significant upticks in preeclampsia,⁸ miscarriages,^{9,10,11,12,13} premature births,¹⁴ early puberty, as well as maternal and infant deaths.

According to a research letter¹⁵ in JAMA published in late June 2022, maternal deaths in the U.S. rose from 18.8 per 100,000 live births prepandemic, to 25.1 per 100,000 live births during the second, third and fourth quarters of 2020, a relative increase of 33.3%.

That increase can be attributed to COVID-19, since no COVID shots were available in 2020. We don’t yet have the statistics for 2021 and 2022, but based on obituaries and social media posts, it seems many new mothers are now dying “suddenly” and for no apparent reason. Time will tell, but I doubt the trend has gotten any better after the rollout of the COVID shots for pregnant women.

More Vaccines for Pregnant Women

Despite the clear risks of vaccinating during pregnancy, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved a whooping cough vaccine for newborns that is given to mothers in the third trimester. This is the first vaccine aimed at infants that is to be preemptively given to the mother during pregnancy. According to Pharmacy Times:¹⁶

“Since children aged 2 months of age or younger are not eligible to receive an actual vaccine themselves, administering the Tdap vaccine to the mother can boost the infant’s immune system by boosting antibodies in the mother, who then transfers the antibodies to the developing fetus …

According to the CDC, although only 4.2% of US cases occur in this age group, 31% of infants who contract the disease who are also younger than 6 months go to the hospital due to the illness.”

Swedish Journalist Critiques American Reporting

In an early October 2022 commentary in the Swedish newspaper Sydsvenskan,^17,18 journalist and author Johan Anderberg expressed being perplexed by The New York Times’ jubilant announcement this past summer that toddlers could finally get the COVID shot.

“For a reader on the other side of the Atlantic, the reporting on infant vaccination appeared somewhat puzzling,” Anderberg writes. “In most European countries, citizens had long since stopped caring about the pandemic, and in Denmark, the head of public health, Soren Brostrom, had even said that it was a mistake to vaccinate children between the ages of 5 and 11.

But for the New York Times — and its subscribers — this was a big event. When the magazine asked its readers to send in stories about what it was like to live with unvaccinated toddlers, they received 1,600 responses. Several of them said their children had never been allowed to play with friends or meet their relatives indoors.

At the end of the summer, the first numbers came out on how many Americans had actually vaccinated their toddlers in the first month. It turned out fewer than 5% of American children under the age of 5 had received their first injection.

Not so long ago, those kinds of numbers would have been thought provoking for a newspaper like the New York Times: Did we have an incorrect picture of the mood in the country? … Was there a perspective on the issue that we missed? But it no longer works that way.”

He goes on to describe how The New York Times has changed from “all the news that’s fit to print” into a publication that cherry picks its stories based on political bias and a preconceived agenda, and rarely ever presents more than one viewpoint anymore.

Had they been more journalistically inclined and less biased, they would not have gotten the COVID-jab-for-infants’ story so wrong. Many Americans also “received a blatantly incorrect picture of the risks with the new coronavirus through The New York Times reporting,” Anderberg writes.

The New York Times’ fallacies spread as far and as high as the Supreme Court, where Supreme Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor publicly overstated the number of serious COVID infections among children by 2,000%. That enormous flub was a direct result of depending on mainstream sources with an agenda to spread fear rather than truth.

Vaccines and Bioweapons Are One Industry

The fact that we have no real independent press anymore has become painfully clear over the past three years. What we have are corporate-government propaganda outlets and censored alternative media. There’s not much in between.

Certainly, you rarely ever find both sides of an issue covered by the same media outlet anymore. Media has become incredibly polarized and, with it, the population at large. As noted by Anderberg, the mainstream press has played a key role in this polarization, as it has abandoned rules of journalism such as unbiased research and reportage and presenting more than one side of every story.

The reason for this appears to be because media are owned and controlled by those who benefit from the pandemic. In short, media’s refusal to state the obvious is because the obvious doesn’t fit the narrative that we must surrender our freedom for biosecurity’s sake.

But the promise of biosecurity is itself a lie. Not only is SARS-CoV-2 a bioweapon, but the COVID shot is too. Once people realize that the vaccine industry and the bioweapons industry have become one and the same, the big picture will become clearer.

COVID Shots Are Weapons of Mass Destruction

These shots may have many purposes, but none of them is to protect your health. They may be part of a depopulation agenda. They may be part of an ongoing experiment to perfect some aspect of the transhumanist goal to merge man with AI and synthetic biology. They may have a social engineering purpose. They’re undoubtedly part of the global takeover effort by the New World Order/Great Reset cabal.

But they’re not part of a benevolent public health program. If they were, the corporate-government alliance would not have spent billions to first entice and bribe people into taking the shots (remember those million-dollar lotteries?), and later shame, bully and threaten to ostracize from society or outright kill the unvaccinated.

If COVID-19 were a naturally-occurring virus, then scientists, media, Big Tech and bioweapons chief Dr. Anthony Fauci would not have gone out of their way to suppress and censor debate about its origin.

Similarly, if the COVID shots were a novel but beneficial intervention for an unprecedented health crisis, the input and feedback of scientists around the world would have been welcomed rather than censored. (Ditto for doctors’ feedback on successful treatments. If saving lives was the goal, all suggestions would have been welcomed.)

The reason no one, regardless of qualifications, is permitted to speak about the dangers of these shots is because they’re supposed to be dangerous. They’re bioweapons. The mindset of those pushing for a post-human transhumanist world may be complex (if not incomprehensible), but the strategy to achieve their desired ends is that simple.

Mankind Is Being Regressed Into Oblivion

Mankind is being decimated by not just one but several different bioweapons — the original virus and a steady stream of ever-changing gene influencing shots. In the process, survivors of the next generation, children born and growing up in these times, are being robbed of intelligence, health and life span.

Mankind is quite literally being regressed. The Big Pharma-biotech-bioweapons complex are risking everything, the very future of mankind itself, in this effort to “reset” the world and shape it to their own liking and benefit.

Many worry about a nuclear World War III between nations but, in reality, World War III has already begun. The transhumanist-centered pharma-bioweapons industry has spent the last two years decimating its enemy — mankind — using the most sophisticated biowarfare and social engineering tools the world has ever seen.

Learn to Say No

The primary defense we have against these attacks is the word “no.” If enough of us simply reject whatever they roll out next and work on building our own parallel systems, we can preserve life and liberty for coming generations.

The globalist cabal is using bioweapons, but we can refuse to take them. They’re using sophisticated social engineering, but we can educate ourselves on their tactics, thereby insulating ourselves against their programming. They’re tearing down the infrastructure we depend on for life, including the financial system, the health care system and the food system, but we can replace them with ethical and pro-human alternatives.

We don’t have to agree to their “solutions,” which are coming, and will include living in smart cities with digital identities, a social credit score, surveillance down to your biological processes and a programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC), all of which will render you into a 21st century slave with a digital choke chain around your neck. Avoiding that fate won’t be easy. It certainly won’t be convenient. But it’ll be worth it.

• ¹ Washington Post October 8, 2022
• ² The Phaser November 18, 2021
• ³ Science July 15, 2022
• ⁴ OpenVAERS Vaginal Hemorrhage data
• ⁵ Reproductive BioMedicine 2021 Jan; 42(1): 260–267
• ⁶ Obstetrics and Gynecology April 1, 2022: 139(4):481-489
• ⁷ BMJ 2021;374:n2211
• ⁸ New Yorker August 12, 2022
• ⁹ Obstetrics & Gynecology April 20, 2021
• ¹⁰ OpenVAERS Miscarriage reports
• ¹¹ Pierre Kory Substack August 20, 2022
• ¹² Wayback NEJM Letter to the Editor June 27, 2021
• ¹³ Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law November 2021; 4: 130-143
• ¹⁴ Health Day July 26, 2022
• ¹⁵ JAMA June 28, 2022; 5(6): e2219133
• ¹⁶ Pharmacy Times October 7, 2022
• ¹⁷ Sydsvenskan October 2, 2022
• ¹⁸ Twitter Anthony LaMesa October 9, 2022