Mrs. Downs, 64, contracted COVID-19 while on vacation. She went to the local emergency room after returning home for treatment. She was transferred to a bigger facility in Ohio when her condition worsened.

Mrs. Downs, though, kept getting worse, despite a federally recommended treatment course including remdesivir.

On the same day Mrs. Downs was placed on a ventilator, her family asked doctors to try ivermectin, an anti-malarial that has had some success against COVID-19. Because the treatment course was not working, relatives felt it was time to try something new.

The hospital refused. A clinical ethicist there cited how the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned people against using ivermectin against COVID-19. The ethicist claimed there could be “great harms” if Mrs. Downs was given ivermectin.

“This may make the family upset,” he wrote in notes reviewed by The Epoch Times.

But Mrs. Downs’s husband and daughters weren’t giving up. They sued the hospital to try to force the facility to either administer ivermectin or allow an outside doctor in to administer it.

A local doctor who reviewed Mrs. Downs’s case said she should be able to receive the drug. Based on his research into ivermectin, he said there was “very little downside” in trying the drug, whether it worked or not.

A settlement was reached on Aug. 19, 2021. The settlement said that the hospital would administer ivermectin, but that the administration was conditional on “the treating physician(s) professional judgement and discretion, and the applicable standard of care.”

Mrs. Downs never received ivermectin. She died at the hospital on Sept. 2, 2021.

If she had received the drug, “I believe it would have set some kind of precedent, so they did everything they could to make sure she was never going to get it,” Donald Downs, Mrs. Downs’s husband, told The Epoch Times. “If we could’ve gotten it to her sooner, maybe things would’ve been different.”

Possible Fine Looms Over Family

The family experienced pressure from the court system and OhioHealth, which runs the facility to which Mrs. Downs was admitted, to agree to a fine of $100,000 for each person who disclosed the existence of the settlement.

They still signed the confidential settlement because they felt there was limited time for Mrs. Downs to receive ivermectin.

“We were under severe pressure and in desperation to save my wife and my daughter’s mother,” Mr. Downs said. “We would do anything to try to save her.”

Ralph Lorigo, a lawyer who was representing the family, said that the judge in the case wanted him to sign the settlement, which would open him up to being fined as well if he violated the agreement.

“I’ve never in my at that point 47 or 48 years in my career had a judge ever tell the lawyer that they had to be part of that settlement,” Mr. Lorigo told The Epoch Times.

Mr. Lorigo said a confidential agreement was fine but that the parameters of this one were “so broad.”

“If you named the hospital, for Christ’s sake, you could be responsible for $100,000,” Mr. Lorigo said.

Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Judge Mark Serrott, who was overseeing the case, told the Downs family that Mr. Lorigo was blocking the settlement by refusing to sign, according to the family. The family fired Mr. Lorigo to make sure the settlement went through.

Judge Serrott “tells us that we will be able to get my wife the medicine as soon as we sign the agreement,” Mr. Downs said. Judge Serrott and Jeffrey Perry, a local attorney who helped secure the settlement, did not respond to requests for comment.

Judge Serrott, the family says, told them they were forbidden to discuss the case. “When someone asks you about this case, you are going to say, ‘the judge says I’m not allowed to talk about it,'” he said, the family recalls. The judge made them repeat the sentence.

The threat of a fine loomed over the family for years, preventing them from talking about how their mother and wife died.

On Oct. 27, 2022, the Downs family asked the Franklin County court to declare the settlement void on the grounds it was illegal, procured fraudulently because OhioHealth never intended to administer ivermectin or allow it to be administered, and was procured under duress. OhioHealth countersued, asking the court to sanction the family for a frivolous filing.

Judge Carl Aveni ruled on Oct. 6, 2023, that the settlement agreement was never enforceable because Mr. Downs voluntarily dismissed the suit after his wife died. He said he would rule on the countersuit at a later time.

Initially Alert

Mr. and Mrs. Downs were enjoying summer vacation in Baton Rouge, Louisiana when Mr. Downs became ill. His wife began experiencing symptoms several days later. They returned home early. Mrs. Downs then went to a local hospital with symptoms including cough, headache, and sore throat.

A doctor who on July 28, 2021, saw Mrs. Downs said she was “not ill-appearing or toxic-appearing,” nor “in acute distress. Mrs. Downs did test positive for COVID-19, he wrote in notes reviewed by The Epoch Times. The doctor sent her home with an inhaler in stable condition.

Five days later, Mrs. Downs went back to the same hospital, Hocking Valley Community Hospital, reporting diarrhea, nausea, cough, fever, and loss of taste and smell.

Dr. John Ireton, the doctor at Hocking Valley, described plans to start Mrs. Downs on the anti-inflammatory dexamethasone. He did not plan to administer remdesivir due to “recent poor efficacy data,” he wrote in notes from the Aug. 2, 2021, encounter.

Even a day later, Mrs. Downs was in relatively good condition despite experiencing some symptoms, according to additional notes. The patient was “pleasant and cooperative” while appearing “moderately ill,” Dr. Ireton wrote.

But the patient’s inflammatory markers started trending upward, and she soon required oxygen.

Mrs. Downs was transferred to Doctors Hospital, the bigger facility, on Aug. 5, 2021, in part because the facility had “remdesivir and other COVID-19 treatments unavailable at this facility,” Dr. Ireton wrote in discharge notes.

Remdesivir is an antiviral cleared by the FDA for treating COVID-19.

Placed on Ventilator

Mrs. Downs was admitted to the intensive care unit at Doctors Hospital the same day, with conditions including acute respiratory failure and a slow heartbeat, the doctors there said.

Other symptoms were later noted, including acute kidney injury. It was “unknown” whether those conditions were present at admission, the doctors said in notes reviewed by The Epoch Times.

Doctors after admission started Mrs. Downs on a course of remdesivir, which some researchers have said is linked to kidney injury. The doctors also continued the dexamethasone and added various vitamins and other drugs, including the monoclonal antibody tocilizumab and vitamin C. Family members say they asked if remdesivir was being administered and were told no.

Doctors used a bilevel positive airway pressure machine to assist Mrs. Downs with breathing. They ended up placing her on a ventilator on Aug. 11, 2021, due to worsening symptoms, despite her telling them she did not want to be intubated. Fentanyl and other drugs were administered.

On the same day as the intubation, the family asked that ivermectin be administered, under the Right to Try Act, as the treatments applied by the hospital weren’t working.

Gavin Enck, a clinical ethicist at OhioHealth, said that the request would have to be rejected because it did not meet the conditions of the act, such as being an investigational drug studied in clinical trials. “Second, the FDA has publicly stated that it neither treats COVID nor benefits the patients; in fact, there are great harms in using ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19. As a result, ivermectin is non-beneficial treatment,” Mr. Enck wrote in an analysis dated Aug. 11, 2021, that was reviewed by The Epoch Times.

Ivermectin is an FDA-approved drug, but not for COVID-19. Doctors in the United States commonly prescribe drugs for non-approved uses. The FDA said in a warning earlier in 2021 that ivermectin was not approved to treat COVID-19 and that “taking large doses of this drug is dangerous and can cause serious harm.” The FDA has since acknowledged doctors can prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19, while an appeals court said the FDA likely overstepped its authority with the warning and similar statements.

Mr. Enck said that if the family didn’t like the decision, they could take action.

“While this may make the family upset, they do have the right to request a transfer,” he wrote. “While it is extremely unlikely another organization would accept the patient in order to provide ivermectin, they family [sic] can still work on setting up a transfer.”

Mr. Enck did not pick up his phone or return a voicemail. OhioHealth did not respond to a request for comment.

The family asked to speak to hospital administrators and offered to sign waivers. They said their attempts were turned down.

Family members also spoke to Dr. Brian Still, Mrs. Downs’ primary care doctor. He agreed to prescribe Mrs. Downs ivermectin and wrote a letter saying he felt there was little downside to trying it.

Suit Filed

Desperate to give their loved one a better chance at surviving, the family took OhioHealth to court.
They chose Mr. Lorigo, who had won multiple similar cases for patients that wanted ivermectin, to represent them.

“Every time he won a case in court, the person that got it lived,” Cara Bookman, Mrs. Downs’s daughter, told The Epoch Times.

The family through their lawyers filed an emergency request for relief in the Franklin County court on Aug. 16, 2021. Attorneys asked for an emergency sealed hearing.

The hearing was held on Aug. 18, 2021. The family was not present. Judge Serrott, the family said, called them and said that the parties were nearing an agreement on a confidential settlement that would bar the family from discussing the settlement and include a fine if they did.

OhioHealth wanted a $1 million fine but Judge Serrott changed the amount to $100,000, according to the family.

The judge also said that Mr. Lorigo was holding up the settlement by refusing to sign it. The family offered to fire him in a bid to finalize the settlement and get Mrs. Downs the ivermectin.

That’s when the family says the judge told them Mrs. Downs would be able to receive the drug as soon as they signed the settlement.

The agreement indemnified OhioHealth for administering ivermectin and stated that OhioHealth “shall prescribe and administer a 12 (twelve) mg daily oral dose of ivermectin for 4 (four) days” to the patient.

It also said, however, that the prescription and administration were “subject to the [sic] treating physician(s)’ professional judgment and discretion, and the applicable standard of care.”

No Ivermectin

The family went to the hospital after signing the agreement and learned Mrs. Downs had not received ivermectin. A nurse said that Mrs. Downs was experiencing cognitive issues and doctors felt ivermectin could harm her. Several doctors then met with the family and said that they didn’t want to administer the drug. The family agreed to a one-day delay.

According to the Downs family, Dr. Joseph Gastaldo told them during the meeting that ivermectin may have helped Mrs. Downs if it had been administered at an earlier date. But Dr. Gastaldo later told a local broadcaster that there was “no proven benefit” for using ivermectin against COVID-19 and “potentially has toxicities if you take it at a higher dose.”

Additional attempts to secure the drug for Mrs. Downs were not successful, prompting the family to ask Mr. Perry, the local attorney, about dismissing the case.

“We did not want to be held liable for the $100,000 each [in the] confidentiality agreement knowing that they were still not going to give her the medicine,” Mr. Downs said.

Mrs. Downs died on Sept. 2, 2021.

Judge Serrott, about a week later, dismissed the case.

The family said they later found they were still held to the confidentiality agreement. They filed the fresh action in October 2022 to ensure they could speak about their ordeal.

The complaint was straightforward, Warner Mendenhall, who is now representing the family, told The Epoch Times. Without a ruling from the court, the family “would be under the threat” of the fines, he said.

OhioHealth countersued, alleging that the family was launching a frivolous action. Hospital lawyers asked for sanctions.

Judge Aveni finally ruled on the matter nearly one year later. While confirming the confidentiality agreement was not in effect, he rejected the family’s attempt to dismiss the countersuit, saying the case would be decided in the future.

The family wants people to know about their experience with a major hospital and the court system.

“If I hadn’t went through this, I don’t know if I could believe it,” Mr. Downs, a pastor, told The Epoch Times. “It’s that horrendous.”

They are hoping that OhioHealth, the doctors there, and Judge Serrott are in some way held accountable for what transpired.

“We are seeking justice,” Mr. Downs said, “so that no other family has to go through what we did.”

On October 21, 2021, his mother died at Baylor University Hospital. According to Stein, she died because the hospital went through their standard Covid protocols despite the fact that he and his mother specifically forbade the use of Remdesivir. They gave it to her anyway and she died.

In a heartbreaking interview with One America News, Stein revealed a side to him that most haven’t seen. He says his experiences in 2021 are part of the reason he has become one of the most driven members of conservative media in his quest to expose the lunacy of the radical left. Watch:

Leave a comment about this video at The Liberty Daily’s Substack.

Yesterday, she made a short statement on Twitter that echoes the sentiment of patriots across the nation. She was responding to a video of Dr. Paul Marik calling out the government for incentivizing hospitals to prescribe the dangerous drug Remdesivir for Covid-19 while they panned safe and effective treatments. Favoring Anthony Fauci’s pet drug was criminal and Lake let everyone know this.

This is tragic and people need to be arrested.

This is tragic and people need to be arrested. https://t.co/aqYHTqZYnD

— Kari Lake (@KariLake) December 14, 2022

More doctors have been speaking out against the government’s push to promote Fauci’s failed treatment, but few politicians have done the same. It’s conspicuous that Lake, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, and U.S. Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin are among the few who have spoken out against not only Big Pharma, but their many puppets on Capitol Hill.

As Lake noted, people really do need to be arrested. Then, they need to be tried, convicted, and jailed. Hundreds of thousands if not millions of Americans were harmed by the government’s incentives and the hospitals who accepted them. How many lives were lost over corporate greed and political corruption?

It was a blockbuster interview all the way through, but there was one comment in particular that should chill Americans to the bone. As the attorneys claim in their lawsuits, the unvaxxed were primarily targeted.

According to Infowars, attorneys Michael Hamilton and Dan Watkins joined The Alex Jones Show to break down their fight against medical tyranny and the deadly Covid protocols, such as the Remdesivir and respirator campaign.

“If there’s any group that was targeted, it’s the unvaxxed,” Watkins said. “As soon as they know you’re unvaxxed, you are immediately moved into this protocol and your care is put down on the backburner and no one pays attention to you until you’re done.”

Jones was shocked. “Wow, so that’s bioethical eugenics targeting.”

Watch:

Daniel Watkins with Watkins & Letofsky and Michael Hamilton with Hamilton & Associates filed three complaints—one against Saint Agnes Medical Center, Community Regional Medical Center, and Clovis Community Medical Center—in the Superior Court of California in Fresno County on Sept. 7.

Both Clovis Community Medical Center and Saint Agnes Medical Center told The Epoch Times that they couldn’t comment on pending litigation, while Community Regional Medical Center didn’t immediately respond.

Watkins and Hamilton discussed the lawsuit the day of the filing at an event called, “Remdesivir Death: Landmark Lawsuit,” where they were joined by medical advocates such as Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Bryan Ardis, Dr. Angie Farella, and Dr. Janci Linsay, all of whom have spoken out against the use of remdesivir.

Watkins said they filed the lawsuits on the behalf of 14 Fresno-area families who allege that the hospitals engaged in medical deception and failed to provide informed consent in relating the potential side effects, such as kidney failure.

“Full informed consent means that patients must be provided with full information about the deadly harm that this dangerous experimental drug causes on its own,” the lawsuit states. “They must be told that the only time it was ever tested, it was pulled because it killed so many people.”

The lawsuit references a study found in the New England Journal of Medicine in which a safety board found it to be the least effective and deadliest drug in the trial before it was suspended after 53 percent of the Ebola patients who took the drug died.

The National Institute of Health (NIH) has said it’s the only drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat COVID-19.

“Remdesivir received Emergency Use Authorization in or around May of 2020, after being recommended by an NIH panel that contained nine individuals with financial ties to its creator, Gilead Sciences,” the lawsuit alleges. “It is very nearly the equivalent of a death sentence for a COVID patient, or a patient with real Pneumonia (as opposed to ‘covid pneumonia’).

Without receiving informed consent before giving remdesivir, the hospitals violated the Nuremberg Code, the lawsuit states, which criminalizes human experimentation performed without informed consent.

In some cases, according to witness testimony, Watkins said in the conference that remdesivir was given even after the patients declined.

The Remdesivir Protocol

The lawsuit alleges that the patients were subjected to what it called “The Remdesivir Protocol,” which varies in each hospital.

“A patient comes to the hospital often for a problem unrelated to COVID-19,” the lawsuit says. “They are told they have COVID-19 or ‘COVID pneumonia.’”

From there, they are separated from loved ones and placed in a room where they are told remdesivir is the only option, the lawsuit says.

“They are placed on a BiPap machine at a high rate, making it difficult for them to breathe,” the lawsuit says. “Their hands are often tied down so they can’t take the BiPap machine off their face.”

In many cases, the lawsuit says a psychiatrist will determine the patient agitated, which results in the sedation of the patient, making it difficult for them to fight the side effects of remdesivir “especially as it relates to their ability to breathe against the side effects and against the BiPap machine.”

“Their phone and the signaling instrument for the nurse are typically placed beyond their reach,” the lawsuit alleges.

The patients are also kept malnourished, and eventually intubated, the lawsuit states, where the patient then dies.

“It takes a ‘protocol patient’ about nine days to die on average,” the lawsuit states.

The lawsuit goes on to address federal financial incentives the hospital gets for each step in the protocol.

Hamilton, who is also a legal strategist with the medical, constitutional, and spiritual rights organization Truth for Health Foundation spearheaded by Dr. Lee Vliet, discussed what he said was the financial reward system for the protocols in the conference.

“What I’m going to speak about is the average charge rate for three categories of COVID victims,” Hamilton said.

If a patient is treated and sent home, the average charge rate in California is $3,200, he said.

“If you bring them into the hospital and treat them as a non-complex COVID patient, the average charge rate is $111,000,” he said. “However, if you treat them as a complex COVID patient, which means you have to either intubate them, or put them in intensive care, by definition they become complex, and for that the average charge rate is roughly $450,000.”

On top of these charges, the hospitals get a bonus from the government by way of the International Classification of Diseases code that allows them to charge an extra 20 percent on the entire hospital stay, adding $90,000 to the $450,000.

“So, you can see why there’s a great incentive not to just give them something that works and send them home, but to actually bring them in, find a way to intubate them, call it a complex case, and get $500,000 instead of $3,200. That’s a tremendous financial incentive.”

Personal Autonomy

The four causes of action listed in the lawsuit are fraudulent concealment leading to wrongful death, violation of the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act, medical negligence leading to wrongful death, and medical battery leading to wrongful death, all of which are related to the allegation that the hospitals failed to adequately treat the patients.

During the conference, Watkins said they filed the lawsuit “in hopes that it will spark the filing of many others because there are healthcare professionals and facilities across [nation] this doing this.”

“Fundamentally, personal autonomy in medical decisions is a right that we all have, and that’s the real issue here,” Watkins said.

Article cross-posted from our premium news partners at The Epoch Times.