To be clear, the news media did not imply intent on the part of manufacturers, but I would like to remind everyone that breakfast cereal pioneer John Harvey Kellogg was part of a coalition of powerful American eugenicists who aggressively pushed abortion and forced sterilization policies since the 1910s, before handing off leadership of the (grotesquely racist) global eugenics movement to Adolf Hitler’s Germany in the 1930s after an outraged American public started pushing back. Kellogg’s version of Hitler’s later policies were advanced by his own organization, the Race Betterment Foundation.
If you’re wondering why so many people suddenly need IVF services today to procreate that their numbers can skew elections, perhaps you have your answer – or a partial one: The elites have once again been caught replacing the natural world and its processes (think Monsanto) with artificial ones that, conveniently, also generate income for themselves. (The craven, highly profitable “transgender” surgical industry is another glaring example.)
Ever since Thomas Malthus predicted (falsely) in 1798 that human population would soon outstrip food supplies, “Malthusianism” has been a central tenet and motivator of the global elites. The two obvious questions Malthusianism raised were 1) how to produce more food, and 2) how to limit population. In the present era, Kellogg’s now multinational conglomerate apparently figured out how to do both simultaneously.
But a third obvious question arose among the elite aristos of Malthus’ era (who in many cases were literally “en-titled” members of royal dynasties) who assumed for themselves the right to set laws and social policies to steer the world toward their vision of the future. That question was “If population must be reduced, who do we keep and who do we get rid of?” Out of the contemplation of that question was born “eugenics,” formalized by Charles Darwin’s nephew Francis Galton and expanded worldwide through international conferences and networking. The meme and motto of the movement emerged in the Second International Eugenics Conference (1921) in the form of the infamous “Eugenics Tree” logo, captioned “Eugenics is the self direction of human evolution.”
It is widely believed that eugenics ideology died out after World War II due to its association with Nazi Germany, but in reality it just faded into the background where, due to technological advances in genetics, robotics and artificial intelligence, it slowly but fully morphed into “transhumanism.”
From antiquity in Judeo-Christian civilization, human fertility had always been considered both a personal blessing and a social priority. “Be fruitful and multiply” was one of God’s first commands – and it has never been rescinded despite what people may think under the ever-rising pressure of Malthusian anti-family propaganda by Bill Gates and his ilk.
Biblically speaking, in vitro fertilization is not evil in itself. In at least one instance, when the normal fertilization failed in the Bible, God endorsed an alternative. The story of Judah and Tamar in Genesis 38:1-10 indicates that surrogate impregnation of a woman by a close male relative of her husband was socially expected, even mandated if her husband died. Indeed, when Judah’s son Onan deliberately spilled his seed on the ground during sex with Tamar to avoid his procreative duty to his deceased brother Er, God killed him for it!
Onan’s crime was not masturbation as some teach, but refusal to impregnate Tamar for the perpetuation of Er’s line. It was an anti-fertility crime – as is the presumed elite population-control campaign using anti-fertility chemicals. Let’s not forget that Gates (whose father was a Planned Parenthood board member) and the ultra-corrupt WHO stand accused of putting such chemicals in tetanus vaccines for women in Africa. Leftist media “fact checkers” dispute that, but who believes anything from them after the Twitter Files exposé? Follow the money and the ideology to find the truth.
Prior to advances in anti-fertility chemistry by Big Pharma, surgical sterilization was the primary preventive measure of the eugenicists, and abortion (pre-birth infanticide) was their back-up system. These were relatively small-scale operations from the 1920s through the ’40s, centered on ethnic minorities, but then in the 1950s the elites launched the “sexual revolution” to divorce sexuality from fertility (and family) as a universal social priority and to fully normalize every form of anti-fertility and anti-family practice and policy. The porn industry, the no-fault divorce movement, radical feminist ideology, the abortion industry, the LGBT movement and the pharmaceutical birth-control tsunami were all elements of this strategy that made supposedly “consequence-free” (meaning pregnancy free) sex the highest aim of Western civilization. It has always been about population control.
The weakest link in the eugenicist game plan has always been women, because God designed them as baby-makers and nurturers, physically, emotionally and psychologically. Turning women against their own nature has always required massive effort and expense by the elites, with limited success. Time and life experience has always been on the side of nature with even many of the most virulent self-centered feminists in their teens and 20s later escaping the net and reconnecting with their mothering instincts. I think the attack on women we’re seeing by these same elites using transgenderism is in fact punishment driven by frustration and rage that the Malthusian’s methods just aren’t working. Yes, there is still a large pro-abortion contingent in the electorate, even including women who have otherwise reverted to a more natural version of themselves, but it’s not unbreakable.
I believe the answer to all of it is for men, individually and collectively, to start affirming true femininity and natural womanhood with all the confidence of a conquering army and the passion of an election campaign. Bypass the battlegrounds the left has chosen for themselves and go right to the women, letting them know they are valuable and needed just as God made them. Because the only real antidote to the culture of lies and artificiality enslaving our society today is honest interactions among real people who speak plain truth and pursue a return to the God’s natural order in their own lives. Neither Malthusianism, nor eugenics, nor transhumanism have any place or power in that world.
Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].
]]>At a recent health symposium, Biden HHS director Xavier Becerra announced: “We have issued some guidelines that say that a provider who receives Medicare and Medicaid funding, must be prepared to offer “gender affirming care.”
“If you want that Medicaid dollar to come to your state, we’re gonna make sure you check the box,” Becerra demanded.
Biden regime to force genital mutilation of children by leveraging Medicare and Medicaid programs
The 10th annual Aspen Ideas: Health symposium just concluded in Colorado, with various corporate media, Big Tech, and Big Government figures providing insight into their plans and motivations. The symposium featured medical correspondents from CNN, ABC, and NBC News and other health personalities like Chelsea Clinton from the Clinton Foundation. Anthony Fauci was there, too, along with Vivek Murthy, the disgraced US Surgeon General who also worked unconstitutionally with the Big Tech companies to censor dissent against COVID origins, lockdowns, and unlawful vaccine mandates.
Of note at the symposium was Biden’s Director of Health and Human Services (HHS), Xavier Becerra, who sat down in a speech and threatened to cut Medicare and Medicaid payments to hospitals if they don’t allow for the hormonal castration and genital mutilation of children. Becerra refers to these gross violations of children as “gender affirming care” and is now pursuing a communist approach to enforcing these needless procedures on children across the United States.
“We have issued some guidelines that say that a provider who receives Medicare and Medicaid funding, must be prepared to offer “gender affirming care,” he demanded. “We unfortunately ran into a couple of circuit courts that said differently, and so we are now in the process of having to work under those rulings, but we are not going to stop – everywhere we have an opportunity at the federal level.”
Using classic doublespeak, he said: “Again, I go back to yesterday’s conversation. We do not control healthcare. We do not control how gender affirming care is provided or if it is provided. But where we have laws that require you to fulfill your obligations, if you want that Medicaid dollar to come to your state, we’re gonna make sure you check the box.”
Just like that, the US federal government announced their plans to coercively experiment on children’s psychology, pump them full of hormones that destroy their development, and push forth the mutilation of their private parts. This is the federal government plan to pushback against hospitals like the Texas Children’s Hospital, which recently announced they will stop mutilating children.
Over the last few years, the most macabre forms of child molestation have been incorporated into standard medical practices all across the United States. These practices are marketed as “gender affirming care” and are referred to as gender transitions that are necessary to save the lives of children who are on the verge of suicide. Now, in the spirit of communism, the federal government is threatening to withhold Medicaid and Medicare tax dollars from states if they do not go along with the psychological abuse, hormonal torture, and castration of children’s private body parts.
Where is the law and order on this issue that impacts the future generations? Will the courts hold the government accountable for leveraging these programs in a coercive and harmful manner?
Sources include:
]]>From the COVID-19 pandemic to abortion funding and transgender mandates, HHS has twisted federal law and the pursuit of public health to marginalize people of faith and promote bureaucrats and leftist activism, warns Roger Severino, former director of the HHS Office of Civil Rights under President Donald Trump. He argues that the next conservative president must reverse these abuses and return HHS to its proper role: the promotion of public health.
“Few areas of life are more important, and more subject to abuse, than public health,” Severino, vice president of Domestic Policy at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal in a statement Monday. “Unfortunately, our public health agencies have replaced science and medicine with politics and ideology, and Americans now face shorter life spans as a result. Reform can only happen if entrenched special interests, from lawless bureaucratic leaders and Big Pharma, are reined in and rooted out.” (The Daily Signal is The Heritage Foundation’s news outlet.)
Severino’s report in the book “Mandate for Leadership,” compiled by the 2025 Presidential Transition Project, notes that after the COVID-19 pandemic was over, U.S. life expectancy continued to drop precipitously. A copy of his report on HHS was provided exclusively to The Daily Signal for this article.
The Heritage Foundation helped launch the 2025 Presidential Transition Project (also known as Project 2025) to equip a potential conservative president to govern effectively from Day One.
HHS has an outsized impact on the federal government, from its role in declaring public health emergencies to its management of Medicare and Medicaid to its $1.6 trillion annual budget. Under Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama, HHS has also used its power over health policy to promote abortion and transgender ideology.
Severino lays out five overarching goals for a conservative president intent on reshaping HHS: (1) protecting life from conception, protecting the rights of conscience of health care workers, and defending biological reality against gender identity ideology; (2) empowering patients to make their own health care choices, enabling providers to offer more options, and unleashing markets to drive down costs and improve quality; (3) promoting stable and flourishing married families instead of LGBT activism and single motherhood; (4) correcting the errors of the COVID-19 pandemic and preparing for the next health emergency; and (5) closing the “revolving door between government and Big Pharma,” where regulators leave government and work for companies they have regulated and pharmaceutical executives move from industry into regulatory agencies.
Severino breaks down the massive bureaucracy of HHS and presents specific recommendations for each branch of the behemoth agency. This article focuses on a few of the specific issues that motivate the major changes he recommends.
1. COVID-19
Many of Severino’s critiques and recommendations for a future HHS trace back to the department’s abuses during the COVID-19 pandemic. His report notes that while the HHS secretary declared a public health emergency, “the threshold for what constitutes a public health emergency—how many cases, hospitalizations, deaths, etc.—was never defined.”
Severino recommends that Congress “restrict HHS’s ability to declare indefinite public health emergencies,” in part by establishing a set time frame for any emergency.
He also recommends that the HHS secretary “investigate, expose, and remediate any instances in which HHS violated people’s rights by” colluding with Big Tech companies to silence dissent on COVID-19.
Severino says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention should be broken up into two separate organizations: one dedicated to gathering scientific data and one responsible for making public health recommendations—”an inescapably political function.” He notes that the CDC previously held back public health information on COVID-19 partially due to “fear that the information might be misinterpreted.”
“CDC should report on the risks and effectiveness of all infectious disease-mitigation measures dispassionately and leave the ‘should’ and ‘must’ policy calls to politically accountable parties,” he writes. “Congress should ensure that CDC’s legal authorities are clearly defined and limited to prevent” an “arbitrary and vacillating exercise of power,” as the U.S. experienced during the pandemic.
He recommends that the Food and Drug Administration, not the CDC, should regulate vaccines, and he calls for reforms to prevent the National Institutes of Health’s “inappropriate industry ties that create serious conflicts of interest.”
He notes that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases—Anthony Fauci’s division of the NIH—”owns half of the patent for the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, among thousands of other pharma patents.” According to NIH documents, NIH Director Francis Collins, Fauci, and Fauci’s deputy director, Clifford Lane, all received royalty payments from pharmaceutical companies between 2009 and 2014.
He faults NIH for funding “gain-of-function viral research that may have been responsible for COVID-19.”
2. Abortion
Severino recommends HHS change many policies to protect unborn life and maternal health and to honor the religious convictions of Americans who object to the use of aborted baby body parts in medical research.
The CDC “should fund studies into the risks and complications of abortion” and require states to report abortion complications and babies born alive despite an attempted abortion, he writes. It should prohibit research on aborted baby body parts, since such research can be “easily” replaced with research on adult stem cells. And it should avoid promoting abortion as health care.
Severino condemns the CDC’s current abortion and maternal mortality reporting systems as “woefully inadequate,” since states provide those statistics on a voluntary basis. “Because liberal states have now become sanctuaries for abortion tourism, HHS should use every available tool, including the cutting of funds, to ensure that every state reports exactly how many abortions take place within its borders, at what gestational age of the child, for what reason, the mother’s state of residence, and by what method.”
The former HHS leader urges the FDA to reconsider its approval of chemical abortion drugs, an approval that currently faces a court challenge. He notes that the complication rater for chemical abortion is “four times higher” than that of surgical abortion and that the chemical abortion drug mifepristone has been associated with 26 deaths of pregnant mothers, over 1,000 hospitalizations, and thousands more adverse events. He calls the approval of this drug “politicized and illegal from the start.”
Severino also calls for the FDA to loosen its restrictions on foreign-made vaccines that were not derived through or tested on aborted baby cells, reinstituting a Trump-era waiver for Japanese-made vaccines.
He urges the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to block Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid funds and to redirect funds to “health centers that provide real health care for women.”
Severino urges HHS to audit the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for compliance to the Hyde Amendment, which prevents federal funding of abortions, and to perform a “full review” of HHS efforts to promote abortion in the wake of the Supreme Court’s overturning Roe v. Wade.
He also urges various HHS departments to rescind “ideologically motivated fearmongering” guidance that the Biden administration released in the wake of the court’s ruling, such as warnings about state governments “targeting” women for getting abortions.
3. Transgender Ideology
“Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of ‘gender identity,’” Severino warns. He urges a potential conservative president to reverse this trend.
Biden’s HHS has interpreted Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in health care, to forbid discrimination on the basis of “gender identity” and sexual orientation as well. Severino urges a future HHS secretary to explicitly revoke this guidance, as HHS did under Trump.
He says that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should reissue and expand upon its 2016 decision that it cannot recommend “gender reassignment surgery” for Medicare beneficiaries, citing the “growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous.” (Many doctors recently testified in favor of a Florida rule blocking Medicaid coverage for experimental transgender interventions.)
He also urges HHS to withdraw guidance allowing taxpayer funds to pay for cross-sex transitions.
He faults the NIH for having been “at the forefront in pushing junk gender science,” and encourages the agency to “fund studies into the short-term and long-term negative effects of [cross-sex] interventions, including ‘affirmation,’ puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries, and the likelihood of desistence [abandoning the desire to change one’s sex] if young people are given counseling that does not include medical or social interventions.”
4. Restoring Religious Liberty
Severino notes that under liberal administrations, the office of HHS that he led, the Office for Civil Rights, “has amassed a poor record of devoting resources to conscience and religious freedom enforcement and is often complicit in approving or looking the other way at the administration’s own attacks on religious liberty.”
He encourages a prospective conservative president to direct the Office for Civil Rights to return to the Trump-era policies that “initiated robust enforcement of these conscience laws.” He urges HHS to reestablish waivers for state and child welfare agencies, especially for faith-based adoption and foster care agencies, which had previously been excluded from federal programs because they were unwilling to place children with same-sex couples.
5. Restoring Medicare and Medicaid
Severino warns that Medicare and Medicaid operate “runaway entitlements that stifle medical innovation, encourage fraud, and impede cost containment, in addition to which their fiscal future is in peril.”
He urges the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to increase Medicare beneficiaries’ control over their own care; reduce regulatory burdens on doctors; ensure sustainability and value for both beneficiaries and taxpayers; and reduce fraud, waste, and abuse. He favors Medicare Advantage and urges Medicare to pay the same amount for outpatient procedures that it does for inpatient hospital services. He also encourages Medicare to reform payments along the lines of intensity and value of service, as opposed to a fee-for-service model.
Severino warns that Medicaid has a higher percentage of improper payments than any other federal program, and encourages the program to stop covering nonmedical services like air conditioning and housing. He says the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should give states more flexibility to strengthen program integrity and to incentivize personal responsibility through work requirements and private insurance.
6. Medical Ethics
Severino encourages HHS to decommission the CDC and NIH Foundations, nonprofit entities “whose boards are populated with pharmaceutical company executives.”
“Private donations to these foundations—a majority of them from pharmaceutical companies—should
not be permitted to influence government decisions about research funding or public health policy,” he writes.
“We must shut and lock the revolving door between government and Big Pharma,” he adds. “Regulators should have a long ‘cooling off period’ on their contracts (15 years would not be too long) that prevents them from working for companies they have regulated. Similarly, pharmaceutical company executives should be restricted from moving from industry into positions within regulatory agencies.”
Severino recommends more changes to HHS, including a prioritization of fatherhood in the many social programs HHS controls, and the elimination of the Head Start preschool program and the NIH Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion.
Article cross-posted from Daily Signal. Image by WEBN-TV via Flickr, CC BY-ND 2.0.
]]>The gender dysphoric youth, who used to be called “Zion,” is reportedly just 15 years old and ready to fully “transition.” Siohvaughn is begging a judge to force Zaya and her father to wait until the child reaches 18 years of age to proceed.
Zaya first “came out” as a tranny back in 2019 at the very young age of 12. Since announcing “her” new Baphomet identity, Zaya, who is biologically male, has been rewarded by the god of this world with several lucrative modeling contracts with companies like Tiffany and Dove – Disney could soon be added to this list – as well as numerous social media deals.
According to Siohvaughn, Dwyane is pushing Zaya to finish mutilating “herself” into a “female” simply for the financial gain. Siohvaughn is concerned about Zaya’s health over money, however. (Related: Some Democrat politicians are calling for parents who refuse to “affirm” their children’s transgender delusions to be charged with felony crimes.)
Dwyane is “poised to profit” from Zaya’s full transition, Siohvaughn says. And she wants to nip the situation in the bud before Zaya ruins “her” life forever with a permanent body and hormone butchering.
“I have concerns that (Dwyane) may be pressuring our child to move forward with the name and gender change in order to capitalize on the financial opportunities that he has received from companies,” Siohvaughn’s legal filing states.
Money and fame are why Dwyane Wade got custody of his four sons, says ex-wife
The suit was filed in response to Dwyane’s August petition to allow Zaya to legally change “her” name from Zion Malachi Airamis Wade to Zaya Malachi Airamis Wade.
Dwyane claims he has the legal right to make this decision on behalf of his “daughter,” and only filed a petition for this “as a courtesy” to his ex-wife.
When Dwyane and Siohvaughn split up in 2011, he obtained full custody of his four sons. About a year later, Siohvaughn spoke with MailOnline (United Kingdom) about her agony over losing her children.
“I think influence had a lot to do with it,” Siohvaughn stated at the time. “Celebrity had a lot to do with it. Money had a lot to do with it.”
According to Siohvaughn, Dwyane admitted to her that he fully intended to make Zaya “very famous due to the name and gender issue and also informed me that there would be endorsements and contracts associated therewith.”
“I am concerned that our child is being commercialized at a young age and also of the uncontrollable consequences of media exposure, i.e., cyberbullying, statements and / or pictures taken out of context of our child, and the unwanted spotlight focused on our child,” she went on to reveal.
When it comes to parental authority over the transgender delusions of their own children, the law remains murky, to say the least. Siohvaughn argues that Dwyane is legally required to consult her on such matters, which include “major decisions affecting care, welfare, activities, health, education and religious upbringing.”
Dwyane, on the other hand, argues that he and he alone is entitled to make decisions on Zaya’s behalf, including the decision to butcher “her” body parts for fame and fortune, regardless of what “her” mother has to say about.
A hearing was scheduled for December to determine whether or not Zaya will be allowed to change “her” name and sex against “her” mother’s wishes.
America is now being transitioned into the image of Baphomet at warp speed. To keep up with the latest, visit Transhumanism.news.
Sources for this article include:
]]>