Has something gone right this time? Spoiler: Well, no.

But do read on – because knowledge, and context, are truly important. The educated guess is – there will be many more of these instances of social media censorship schemes coming down this particular pike.

And what better than to recognize them for what they are, as they do come.

There’s this: UNESCO (that’s the UN agency that used to basically sell you Christmas/New Year postcards to help children in distress, suddenly, waking up to “misinformation”) – and now directly supported by WEF.

What a shocker. WEF is glad that – UNESCO, of all agencies, has come up with what it calls the “internet of trust.” And the informal globalist Switzerland-based group (WEF, though) is also happy to reiterate what those “guidelines” are.

WEF is a flagship global, elitist outfit with no apparent qualms leading with the devastating fact that more people on this planet have access to the internet (“social media”), that to say, a car.

But this is not seen as a problem. Merely an opportunity to subjugate (or kick down) those already in distress.

So you don’t have a car? You can’t afford a home, perhaps? But you do have a phone. Now let WEF tell you what you should think. That’s pretty much the gist of this entire “elaborate” article.

While you may be in a country with decidedly few real rights and/or opportunities, WEF assures you that if only you – about 4.75 billion people on this Earth – could find some “trusted” (“guaranteed” by elites) way to inform and “protect yourself from misinformation, disinformation.”

Well.

“If we can no longer distinguish fiction from reality, falsehood from truth, the foundations of our societies crumble. Democracy, dialogue and debate – all essential to address major contemporary challenges – become impossible,” UNESCO says – quotes WEF.

And some might say – why in the world did UNESCO go that ostentatious rout of stating the horrible truth, that involves UN, and WEF?

Who knows. But WEF has this: A toolkit for “digital safety.”

Tell us, WEF. You, who do, habitually, take “ordinary people” for fools.

“Digital platforms need reporting mechanisms to log policy violations, but given the global nature of their operations, they also need to ensure these mechanisms take into account local cultural sensitivities in the way complaints are handled” – said WEF.

Sound off about this story on The Liberty Daily Substack.

The UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) issued the warning through its International Bioethics Committee (IBC). According to the IBC, neurotechnology could lead to “new possibilities of monitoring and manipulating the human mind through neuro-imaging [and] personality-altering [programs].”

Because of this, the UN agency is now strategizing on a worldwide “ethical framework” to protect humanity from the potential abuses of brain chip technology. UNESCO fears that these abuses will be accelerated by advances in artificial intelligence (AI).

“We are on a path to a world in which algorithms will enable us to decode people’s mental processes,” remarked Gabriela Ramos, UNESCO assistant director-general for social and human sciences. She continued that breakthroughs in neurotechnology that could “directly manipulate [humans’] brain mechanisms, underlying their intentions, emotions and decisions” have “far-reaching and potentially harmful” implications.

Economist Mariagrazia Squicciarini, who heads the executive office of UNESCO’s social and human sciences sector, shared the same sentiment. She noted that the capacity of machine learning algorithms to rapidly pull patterns out of complex data, such as fMRI brain scans, will accelerate brain chips’ access to the human mind.

“It’s like putting neurotech on steroids,” said Squicciarini, who specializes in AI issues.

UNESCO’s IBC convened a conference on July 13 that saw 1,000 participants attend. The results of the conference were released in a 91-page report on July 18.

“The spectacular development of neurotechnology – as well as new biotechnologies, nanotechnologies and [information and communications technologies] – makes machines more and more humanoid,” the report stated. “People are becoming more connected to machines and AI.”

“It is necessary to anticipate the effects of implementing neurotechnology. There is a direct connection between freedom of thought, the rule of law and democracy.”

Musk describes implants as akin to “replacing a piece of the skull with a smart watch”

According to the IBC report, neurotechnology poses a challenge to “some basic aspects of human dignity, such as privacy of mental life or individual agency.” To address these, the committee called for wider transparency of neurotechnology research from industry and academia. It also called for the drafting of “neuro-rights” for inclusion in international human rights law.

UNESCO’s warning about neurotechnology followed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granting Musk’s Neuralink federal approval to conduct trials on humans. Neuralink implants will connect the brain to the cloud via threadlike electrodes sewn into certain areas of the brain. These electrodes will communicate with a chip to read signals produced by the brain’s neurons.

“Because neuron signals become directly translated into motor controls, Neuralink could allow humans to control external technologies … [and regain] lost bodily functions or muscle movement with their mind,” the Daily Mail noted. Musk himself described the implants as akin to “replacing a piece of the skull with a smart watch.”

While the tech mogul has focused on Neuralink’s potential benefits, U.S. federal regulators have zoomed in on its capacity for harm. The company has been the subject of an investigation by the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Agriculture for potential violations of the Animal Welfare Act. The probe, launched at the request of a federal prosecutor, centered on “extreme suffering” experienced by monkeys that the brain implants were tested on.

The IBC report drew specific attention to the risks posed by “dual use” AI brain chip technologies that can be easily reprogrammed for nefarious purposes. Such technologies, it said, possess “the potential to deepen social inequities, to harm individuals’ privacy and to provide methods of manipulating individuals.”

“Groundbreaking developments in neurotechnology offer unprecedented potential,” Ramos ultimately remarked. “But we should remain aware of its negative impact if it is employed for malicious purposes. We must act now to ensure it is not misused and does not threaten our societies and democracies.”

Visit FutureTech.news for more stories about neurotechnology in the form of brain implants.

Watch this video that explains why neurosurveillance and personality-altering weapons – in the form of brain implants – usher in the next step of transhumanism.

This video is from the RogueRunnerRanch channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Neuralink brain implants are ready for injection into humans, says Elon Musk.
• Elon Musk’s Neuralink wants to start implanting their own brain chips in people.
• Ethical questions raised after Elon Musk’s Neuralink company implants chip in monkey’s brain.

Sources include:

• GlobalResearch.ca
• DailyMail.co.uk
• Brighteon.com
• NATURAL NEWS