Liberal women have sworn to go on sex strike over Donald Trump’s election win.

Mr Trump swept to victory in Tuesday’s presidential race that Democrats cast as a referendum on abortion rights and protections for women.

So let me get this straight.  In order to “punish” us, these women are going to quit engaging in sexual immorality and start acting like chaste conservative Christian women?

And since they won’t be having sex, liberal women won’t be having as many abortions either. I think that we can all live with that.

The women that are going on strike are taking inspiration from the “4B movement” in South Korea…

In short, the 4B movement is a vow to swear off men. It is called the 4B movement because in Korean, the four tenets each begin with bi, which means no, according to a paper published by two South Korean researchers at Yonsei University’s Institute of Humanities.

Apparently there are four primary pillars of the “4B movement”…

1. No marriage (Bihon): Advocates believe marriage often limits a woman’s independence, as it traditionally assigns her the role of caregiver and homemaker.
2. No childbearing (Bichulsan): This principle opposes the societal expectation for women to bear and raise children, arguing that motherhood can trap women in lifelong caregiving roles.
3. No dating (Biyonae): The 4B Movement views dating as reinforcing male-centered dating norms and pressures that can compromise a woman’s autonomy and emotional well-being.
4. No close relationships with men (Biyeonae): The movement encourages women to form supportive, empowering friendships with other women rather than depend on male companionship.

Since the 4B movement began, the fertility rate in South Korea has fallen dramatically, and it is now the lowest in the entire industrialized world.

In fact, it is being projected that the population of South Korea could be cut in half by the end of this century if current trends continue. So this type of thinking has had a dramatic impact on that nation.

In addition to South Korea, major sex strikes have been instituted in many other countries around the world in recent years…

Sex strikes are a form of protest more widespread than the 4B movement, have taken place in countries around the world including Colombia, Kenya, Liberia, Italy, the Philippines, South Sudan and Togo.

They also have an ancient pedigree, Aristophanes’ comedy Lysistrata famously telling how Athenian women conspired to deny their men sex in order to end the Peloponnesian War.

Apparently many women consider the complete rejection of all men to be a radical form of “female empowerment”…

While the 4B Movement may seem radical to some, it emphasizes a message of female empowerment through non-conformity and a rejection of prescribed gender roles. For many women in the U.S. and abroad, it represents a way to prioritize self-determination, foster communities with other women, and question societal norms around marriage and motherhood.

Can you imagine what would happen if all men and all women decided to embrace this type of ideology?

We would have no marriages, no families, no children and no future. It is literally a suicidal ideology.

But right now a lot of liberal women are absolutely determined to exercise their power any way that they can.  On TikTok, large numbers of young liberal women are posting videos in which they pledge to be celibate…

In one video shared on TikTok, a young woman pledges to go celibate and encourages others to delete dating apps in order to “exercise sovereignty” over their bodies.

“As a woman, my bodily autonomy matters and this is my way to exercise sovereignty over that,” she says.

“So I highly encourage any other women who are single and still care about progressing women’s rights and still fighting for our bodily autonomy to do the same. Delete your dating apps.”

The woman also encourages others to seek out their female friends for comfort “if you need somebody to cuddle” and describes the 4B movement, which originated in South Korea, as a “point of inspiration”.

Apparently the issue of abortion is motivating a lot of these young women to embrace the 4B movement, and some of them are promising to abstain from sex until a new president is elected in 2028…

“Men will always be against women,” read the caption in one TikTok video of a young woman crying in a car, encouraging women to join the 4B movement. “Women are just as capable to be presidents as a man.”

In another video, a woman says that “for the next four years I am going to abstain from sex with men”.

A separate video was captioned: “I think it’s time for American women to participate in our own 4B movement.”

Many of the videos addressed concerns over abortion, which was on the ballot in 10 states and was central to the Harris campaign.

So what happens if a Republican is elected in 2028?

Will these young women remain celibate until 2032? Personally, I seriously doubt that any of these women were dating Trump voters.

So it won’t be conservative men that they are hurting. Instead, it will be liberal men that will be losing out on sex, and most of them probably voted for Harris anyway.

But that isn’t stopping these young women from pretending that their newfound celibacy will severely punish their political opponents…

“As a woman, my bodily autonomy matters and this is my way to exercise sovereignty over that,” one woman said in a video posted on TikTok. “So I highly encourage any other women who are single and still care about progressing women’s rights and still fighting for our bodily autonomy to do the same. Delete your dating apps.”

“All I have to say is good luck getting laid,” said another TikTok user through mocking laughter. “Especially in Florida, because me and my girlies are participating in the 4B movement.”

They don’t seem to understand that many of us that are conservative are absolutely thrilled that large numbers of single liberal women have decided to stop sleeping around.

If we could get the entire country to abstain from sex outside of marriage, that would be wonderful.

Of course that is not going to happen.

I just wish that we could get more people to understand that when we do things the right way we will be blessed, and when we do things the wrong way we will be cursed.

And as a nation we have definitely been under a curse in recent years.

So I am all in favor of this nationwide sex strike by liberal women.  May it last as long as possible.

Michael’s new book entitled “Why” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com, and you can subscribe to his Substack newsletter at michaeltsnyder.substack.com.

He went on “The View” and said, “Donald Trump, you never see him around strong, intelligent women, ever.”

The response from a multitude of strong, intelligent Trump supporters on 𝕏 was nothing short of seismic. It’s doing nuclear damage to the Kamala Harris campaign, arguably more so than Joe Biden’s “garbage” comment. He is being called ignorant, misogynistic, and unintelligent. In some cases, he’s being called much worse.

It would be impractical to post all of the ones that are currently going viral on the platform but here’s a selection of the top 17:

https://twitter.com/DanicaPatrick/status/1852094170091131107

https://twitter.com/HagemanforWY/status/1852082800972714250

https://twitter.com/AlinaHabba/status/1852079890125725863

https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1852038830196461970

https://twitter.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1852083263013073323

https://twitter.com/KellyannePolls/status/1852078452934934982

https://twitter.com/KristiNoem/status/1852034392941547567

https://twitter.com/JessieJaneDuff/status/1852064159434973217

https://twitter.com/AlvedaCKing/status/1852101345408381100

https://twitter.com/realannapaulina/status/1852028386153292119

https://twitter.com/BrookeLRollins/status/1852033954934657247

https://twitter.com/EliseStefanik/status/1852038418810732936

https://twitter.com/LisaForCongress/status/1852046021267767732

https://twitter.com/MacyGunnell/status/1852123106048934077

https://twitter.com/LisaMarieBoothe/status/1852074580128473159

https://twitter.com/rodzvianca/status/1852067962657869896

https://twitter.com/kimguilfoyle/status/1852100395058987123

There are literally dozens more of these types of videos that I could post, and that just includes the ones going viral. What about the ones that are not getting as much attention? There might be thousands.

Congrats, Mark Cuban. You brought the thunder down on the Kamala Harris campaign. And to think, you did so in an effort to impress people who watch “The View.”

America will one day have a female president.  She will be smart, articulate, prudent, and brave.  She will treat her campaign for office as a chance to prove to the American people that she has their best interest at heart.  She will be thoughtfully prepared to answer any and all questions.  Nobody will say it’s “her turn” or pretend she is more talented than she really is.  Nobody will hold her to a lower or higher standard because of her sex.  She will rise to the top because she earns it.  Americans will listen to her speeches, watch how she conducts her personal life, and conclude that she is the right leader for the time.  And when she is elected, no one will mumble, “She won only because she’s a woman.”  She will win on her own merits.

The Democrats have done women no favors by pushing the candidacies of Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.  Neither has the necessary disposition for holding the highest office in the land.  Both are rash and unwise.  They are selfish and unjust.  They are intemperate and vengeful.  They are self-conscious and uncertain.  They are unkind, impatient, and self-serving.  They exude no faith in God, inspire no hope in others, and display no courage.  They are weak in mind and soul and encourage such weakness in others.  They are unfit to lead.  They are not remarkable women.

That Democrat party elites have forced Hillary and Kamala on the American people shows how little they actually think of women.  Hillary is an inveterate liar and shameless shrew whose chief accomplishment in life has been to obtain enough dirt on Washington insiders to stay out of prison.  She won a seat in the U.S. Senate because New Yorkers pitied her when it became clear that her president husband is a lecherous creep incapable of moderating his own depravities.  Giving Hillary a prestigious government job after Bill’s Oval Office debauchery with an intern barely old enough to drink legally was a Hallmark card kind of way for the American people to say, “Sorry your husband humiliated you while you were first lady.”  Had voters known that Hillary was already scheming for the top job and only pretending to be wounded by Slick Willy’s philandering, they would have been much less likely to overlook her own personal qualities.  And they certainly were not hoping that Hillary’s presidential ambitions would one day return both immoral Clintons back to the White House!

Yet that’s what the elitist Democrat party gave the American people.  You get Hillary!  She will break the glass ceiling and become the most powerful person in the country!  She will do what no woman has ever done before!  Because…well, she put up with Bill’s womanizing…and because Barack gave her the State Department gig as a consolation prize even after she outed him for being born in a foreign nation…and because…well, because it’s her turn, dammit!

Democrats expected Americans to forget that Hillary has always been an unlikable person with a notorious reputation for venality and vindictiveness.  They expected Americans to forget the scandal-plagued years of the Clinton White House, during which stories of Hillary throwing pieces of fine china at Bill Clinton’s head and screaming obscenities at Secret Service agents regularly leaked.  They expected Americans to forget Hillary’s involvement in the cover-up of the 9/11 Benghazi attack that left four Americans dead and which Hillary falsely blamed on a random internet video in order to preserve Obama’s 2012 election viability.  Democrats told Americans to ignore a lifetime of evidence that Hillary Clinton is a vile person and vote for her anyway…because she’s a woman.

Americans would have been better off if Bill and Hillary Clinton had been forced to serve time for selling state secrets to communist China.  Had they ever paid for their various crimes over the years, the Clintons’ hold over official Washington would have disappeared.  Hillary would never have been in a position to seek the presidency.  She and her accomplices would not have been able to commit fraud against the American people with the Russia collusion hoax.  The Democrats would not have spent the last twenty-five years pretending Hillary Clinton should be trusted with the reins of power.  Hillary would be in prison today instead of on television encouraging further acts of violence against President Trump.

Americans would also not be facing the peril of a Kamala Harris presidency.  The reason is simple: by excusing Hillary’s immoral and unethical character, Democrats convinced themselves that her failed presidential campaigns could be attributed to her immense political baggage.  Because she has been a divisive national figure since the ’90s, her supporters blamed “deplorables” for not giving poor, sweet Hillary a chance.  Stuck in that misguided mindset, political operatives came up with an even more misguided solution: to put a woman in the White House, they needed a blank-slate candidate whose public utterances are inscrutable and whose political convictions are always shifting.  Voilà — the vaunted rise of Kamala Harris!

Kamala is that rare breed of public speaker who says less and less the longer she talks.  Once a listener perceives a cogent thought forming from the stream of words exiting her mouth, she takes a linguistic hard left and drives straight over a cliff of utter nonsense.  Trying to make sense of her gibberish is like following Alice down a rabbit hole while tripping on psychedelics and translating Arabic manuscripts into ancient Greek.

Joe Biden’s cognitive decline causes him to ramble incoherently before shouting meaningless words with great enthusiasm.  The Pravda press’s inability to continue hiding his debilitating condition is why the Democrat party chucked him from the top of the ticket without even consulting primary voters.  Kamala Harris speaks just as incoherently as Dementia Joe, and the same state media are doing everything they can to hand her the presidency.  Perhaps if Joe had swapped his tie for a string of pearls and transitioned to “Joan” Biden this last year, the Deep State would have allowed him to finish his run for re-election.

Democrats seem to believe that a woman can ascend to the presidency only if she is as conniving and ruthless as Hillary Clinton or as fatuous and ditzy as Kamala Harris.  They see no value in supporting women with proven intelligence, virtue, courage, and authenticity.  Those attributes are apparently attractive only in male politicians.  Talk about the “soft bigotry of low expectations.”

What else would one expect, though, from a political party that holds women in such low regard?  Democrats encourage men to dominate women’s sports.  They push men into women’s locker rooms, domestic violence shelters, and prison cells.  They promote men who dress up as women in the workplace and let men take credit for “female first” accomplishments.  They tell real women that the best thing they can do for the planet is avoid having babies.  For a party that talks feverishly about destroying the “patriarchy,” Democrats sure do seem committed to making sure that a man in high heels shatters the “glass ceiling.”

What the Democrat party peddles as “female empowerment” should offend all women of integrity.  Women deserved much better than Hillary.  They should expect much more than what Kamala has to offer, too.

(DCNF)—Fox News host Harris Faulkner expressed surprise during a town hall with former President Donald Trump at how many women in the audience were worried about biological men playing women’s sports.

Faulkner hosted a town hall with an all-female audience, which aired Wednesday on “The Faulkner Focus.” She noted that “transgender issues” had become a major part of the campaign cycle before asking the audience how many worried about how it pertains to athletics.

“How many of you are worried about biological men and boys competing against women and girls in sports?” Faulkner asked the audience. “That’s almost – that is the entire room.”

WATCH:

A different shot showed virtually every woman in the audience within the camera’s field of view raising their hands.

“We stop it. We stop it. We absolutely stop it. You can’t have it. It’s a man playing in the game,” Trump said after being asked a question on the topic by a woman whose granddaughters are involved in sports. “I mean, physically from a muscular standpoint. Even if it was a little bit less, maybe they do all sorts of tests and drugs and everything else. Look at what’s happened in swimming. Look at the records that are being broken.”

“You just ban it, the president bans it. You just don’t let it happen,” Trump said after Faulkner asked how he would address the issue.

Multiple college teams elected to forfeit matches against San Jose State University’s women’s volleyball team due to the presence of a biological male on the roster, according to the Los Angeles Times. The transgender player spiked a ball into the face of a San Diego State University player during an Oct. 10 match, the New York Post reported.

North Carolina high school volleyball player Payton McNabb suffered a concussion after a transgender player’s spike hit her in the face during a September 2022 volleyball match. She described ongoing medical symptoms in a legislative testimony given in April 2023.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

He was asked about the claims during an interview.

And he did not deny them.

It is the Daily Mail that now has updated its reporting on the man, who if Kamala Harris is elected, would be in the White House for four years.

It reported, “Doug Emhoff has dismissed bombshell stories that he slapped his ex-girlfriend and had an affair during his first marriage as a ‘distraction,’ but didn’t deny them. … Emhoff was asked by MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough on Friday whether the allegations about his personal life ‘p—–‘ him off. The Morning Joe host didn’t question him over the details or ask whether DailyMail.com reports about his past were true. Scarborough even reduced them to being ‘tabloid’ stories being pushed by Donald Trump and Republican critics. But Emhoff avoided the chance to slap them down and instead brushed them off while he insisting he was focused on his wife’s presidential campaign.”

The results of the Daily Mail’s investigations already have been reported.

Those include that he “forcefully slapped” a former girlfriend allegedly for “flirting” with another man.

That report came from three “friends” who confirmed that Emhoff “assaulted his ex-girlfriend.”

“The Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, 59, allegedly struck the woman in the face so hard she spun around, while waiting in a valet line late at night after a May 2012 Cannes Film Festival event in France,” the report said. “One of her friends told DailyMail.com that the woman called him immediately after the incident, sobbing in her cab, and described the alleged assault.”

Earlier, it was reported that “Emhoff’s first marriage ended when he got his children’s nanny pregnant. The woman, Najen Naylor, 47, did not deny the story when approached by DailyMail.com at her home in the New York millionaires’ playground, The Hamptons,” the Daily Mail documented.

At that time, Emhoff said there had been “tough times” in his first marriage, because of “my actions.”

Finally, the newest report on Emhoff comes from interviews with former coworkers at California law firms where he worked.

He was considered “inappropriate” and “misogynistic” at the office, there were claims he hired an “unqualified” part-time model as legal secretary “because she was young … attractive,” and that he withdrew work benefits from women who didn’t flirt with him.

The Daily Mail also uncovered opinions that he was a foul-mouthed employee.

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

This article was originally published by the WND News Center.

This news comes on the heels of the US House Armed Services Committee just approving an amendment to the NDAA that automatically registers all American males (within the draft age window) for the Selective Service System. This means all American males of draft age can be involuntarily drafter into war. This House vote was approved on May 22nd of this year, as seen in this US HASC video. The automatic draft registration was pushed as a way to “cut government red tape” and skip any requirement for men to “proactively register.”

So now, mechanisms are in place to draft both men and women, thus making sure that young “woke” men don’t evade the draft by simply “self-identifying” as women. It’s not yet clear whether America’s woke youth may attempt to self-identify as imaginary fantasy creatures, since there’s nothing in the NDAA that authorizes mandatory military service for wood fairies, tree elves or rainbow gnomes.

Equal opportunity = Equality opportunity to DIE for the regime.

Here’s a screen shot from the NDAA executive summary document released by the Senate, linked above:

As America’s psychopathic warmongers like Sen. Lindsay Graham are begging for global nuclear war with Russia, Iran and China, the rest of the pro-war government establishment is getting things ready to throw millions of young American men and women into the global war meat grinder.

Apparently, Ukraine has run out of men for the globalists to sacrifice on the altar of blood and power, so now they need to tap into European and American citizens. France, Germany and the UK are also discussing mandatory conscription, gearing up to sacrifice potentially millions of their own citizens who will, of course, be instantly replaced with migrants.

This is how “replacement theory” works. The mass murderers in charge send citizens to die in foreign wars which were entirely avoidable, while illegal immigrants take over their homes, jobs, communities and political leaders.

Russian president Vladimir Putin named simple conditions for peace in a speech given yesterday. These proposals, if accepted by Kiev and the West, would have immediately ended the conflict, halted the bloodshed and pulled the world back from the brink of nuclear annihilation. Importantly, Western leaders showed zero interest in peace with Russia.

They would rather see millions of their own citizens slaughtered in global war than to see peace in Europe.

From the description of that video on Brighteon.com:

BREAKING: Putin announces conditions for the start of negotiations between the Russian Federation and Kiev.

Ukrainian troops must be completely withdrawn from the territory of the DPR, LPR, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions

Ukraine must not join NATO

Russia wants a neutral, non-aligned, nuclear-free status of Ukraine

All Western sanctions against the Russian Federation must be lifted

The status of Crimea and Sevastopol, DPR and LPR, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions as regions of the Russian Federation should be recorded in international treaties

If Kiev and the West refuse the new peace proposal, further conditions will be different, Putin said.

See the full text of Putin’s speech here…

USA preparing for TWO nuclear wars at the same time

Notably, this NDAA authorization effort also: “Requires a DOD plan for deterring and defeating simultaneous aggression by two near-peer nuclear competitors, including requirements for nuclear force sizing.” (Page 4, same link as above.)

This means the USA is preparing for nuclear war with both Russia and China.

The draft is on. Men and women will be sent to war. The dollar will be printed into oblivion, leaving the American masses impoverished. The government will invoke the NDAA to seize all food and fuel supplies nationwide, and they will weaponize the scarcity of food and energy to inflict a mass die-off of the American people.

The occupying, illegitimate US federal government, after all, is not merely at war with Russia and China. It’s at war with the American people. And there’s nothing it won’t do to achieve mass death and destruction on a global scale.

Those who do not see this coming will be destroyed by it. Watch my recent emergency interview with Steve Quayle here to learn the full details of what’s about to go down:

As an American mother of a beautiful 10-month-old boy, I find myself reflecting deeply on the world I want to shape for him—a world that honors our nation’s core values and principles. In an election year, the spotlight on our nation’s foundational ideals reminds us of the profound opportunity we have to reaffirm our commitment to the Constitution’s promises: liberty, equality, and justice for all.

For us, American women—mothers, wives, and steadfast guardians of our families—this period is not just a cycle of political engagement but a call to action to ensure the future reflects the enduring principles we cherish.

The Pillar of Financial Independence

Amid the fervor of election year activities, we’re reminded of the critical importance of financial independence and security. As a mother, I understand the desire to provide the best for our children and to secure their futures. Diversifying our investment portfolio becomes not just a prudent strategy but a reflection of our values of foresight and self-reliance.

In these uncertain times, investing in gold and silver stand out as a hedge against inflation and economic volatility, embodying the stability we seek for our family’s financial future. These precious metals have historically held their value, offering a stabilizing force amidst the economic fluctuations.

Yet, it’s startling to note that only 26% of American women invest in the stock market outside of retirement accounts. This gap highlights a significant area for growth in financial literacy and empowerment. As women, particularly those of us guiding the next generation, embracing investment strategies not only enhances our economic resilience but also sets a powerful example of self-reliance and prudent planning for our children.

The Imperative of Preparedness

Our responsibilities extend beyond financial security to include preparedness for any disaster. The increasing impacts of geopolitical tensions and unforeseen challenges underscore the importance of having a comprehensive emergency plan.

As a mother, ensuring the safety and well-being of my child is paramount. This means not just having an emergency kit and a family communication plan but also advocating for policies that address these crises’ root causes. We seek a sustainable and peaceful world for our children, one where they can thrive without fear of the next disaster.

A Call to Action for American Republican Mothers

As American Republican women, mothers, and wives, we stand at the intersection of nurturing our families and advocating for a society that reflects our cherished ideals. Our engagement in the electoral process is a testament to our commitment to shaping a future that aligns with the principles of liberty, equality, and justice. It’s about ensuring that our children inherit a nation that remains true to its founding ideals—a nation where the promise of the Constitution is alive and well.

Let us, therefore, embrace our multifaceted roles with intention and vigor. Let’s contribute to a future that is prosperous, secure, and reflective of the ideals that define the American spirit. As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, we do so not just for ourselves but for our children. Together, let’s draw on the wisdom of the past and the promise of the Constitution to guide our path forward, ensuring that as American mothers, we raise our children the right way, instilling in them the values and principles that make our country great.

UN Women, a department in the United Nations that describes itself as a “global champion for gender equality,” said in its statement that “we unequivocally condemn the brutal attacks by Hamas on Israel on 7 October” and that it was “alarmed by the numerous accounts of gender-based atrocities and sexual violence during those attacks.” The agency has been criticized for taking more than eight weeks to address the attacks, which resulted in the deaths of about 1,400 Israelis.

“The conduct of UN Women, as well as the UN Secretary-General and other UN agencies, since the October 7 massacre, is disgraceful,” Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen tweeted. “UN Women’s message is weak and late when it comes after almost two months of silence and ignoring the war crimes, crimes against humanity, and sexual crimes committed by the terrorist organization, Hamas.”

Cohen called for the head of UN Women to resign.

Instead of condemning Hamas’ rapes, UN Women since the attacks has posted about climate change, the pay gap and about how “trans lesbians are lesbians too.”

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres addressed the attacks for the first time on Thursday, saying that “there are numerous accounts of sexual violence during the abhorrent acts of terror by Hamas on 7 October that must be vigorously investigated and prosecuted.”

Israeli Ambassador to the UN Gilad Erdan called on Guterres to attend an Israeli event next week showing proof of Hamas’ rapes and to “unequivocally condemn Hamas for committing these shocking crimes,” the Times of Israel reported.

Israeli Police Superintendent Dudi Katz says his officers have more than 60,000 video clips, alongside more than 1,000 statements, attesting to rapes committed by members of Hamas, according to CNN.

Survivors of Hamas’ attacks have recounted chilling stories of Hamas’ rapes.

“These are two girls that were just killed, executed, perhaps raped in their own bedroom,” one combat medic told CNN, describing the aftermath of a home invasion conducted by members of Hamas.

One survivor of the attack on the Supernova music festival said she saw a woman being gang raped and then shot in the head on Oct. 7, The Times of London reported. She also said Hamas terrorists beheaded a woman with a shovel after attempting to rape her.

“The torture of women was weaponized in the destruction of communities, in sowing general horror and in breaking the spirit of the Israelis,” Cochav Elkayam Levy, a professor at Reichman University, told Haaretz.

UN Women did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

(Article curated from End of the American Dream)

I think that the numbers that I am about to share with you say a lot about the current condition of our society.  And if we are not able to find a way to reverse certain trends, the outlook for the future is quite bleak.

Most people know that men tend to favor Republican candidates and women tend to favor Democratic candidates, and this was certainly the case in 2022…

In 2022 House races, men nationally favored the GOP by 14 points (56% Republican to 42% Democrat), while women favored Democrats by 8 points (53% Democrat to 45% Republican).

But when you break those numbers down by marital status, that is when things really start to get interesting…

Republicans are winning married men by 20 points, married women by 14 points, and unmarried men by 7 points. So who is keeping Democrats competitive?

Answer: Single women are single-handedly saving the Democratic Party by a 37-point margin (68% to 31%).

Just let those numbers sink in for a moment.

If it had not been for single women, the 2022 elections would have been a total wipeout for the Democratic Party.

So do women become more conservative once they get married, or are liberal women simply less likely to make that sort of a permanent commitment? I think that is a very good question. If I had to guess, I would probably say that liberal women are a lot less eager to become wives and mothers.

Since they were little girls they were trained to think of family life as a form of “bondage”, and that is extremely unfortunate. Because without strong families no society can thrive for long.

Many of us tend to think of “single women” as a young demographic group, but the truth is that we now have millions upon millions of older “cranky Karens” in our society.

And when they aren’t happy they will definitely tell you about it.

Of course there are millions of other older women that are absolutely delightful.  But it turns out that very, very few of the women in that group are liberal.

Abortion is always one of the top political issues for liberal women.  According to a survey conducted by Pew Research, a whopping 62 percent of all U.S. women disapproved of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade…

While women (62%) are more likely than men (52%) to disapprove of the Supreme Court decision on abortion, the gender gap varies by race and ethnicity. Among White adults, a 62% majority of women disapprove of the court’s decision, compared with 47% of White men. By contrast, comparable shares of Black men (66%) and women (69%) and Hispanic men (59%) and women (54%) disapprove.

This is one of the main reasons why single women are so drawn to Democratic candidates.

They want to be able to have sex with anyone that they want and then dispose of any unwanted babies afterwards.

But this is not something new.  All throughout history, cultures that have rejected sexual morality have always needed a way to get rid of babies that they did not want.

I think that a couple of photographs will help illustrate this point.

The following is a photograph of the giant Planned Parenthood facility that opened in Houston, Texas in 2010.  It cost 26 million dollars to build, and at the time it was the largest such facility in the United States…

Now let me share another picture.

In this one, Planned Parenthood’s facility in Houston is placed next to an ancient Aztec pyramid where children would be sacrificed 500 years ago…

Is this just a coincidence?

But if you try to tell liberal women that they shouldn’t be slaughtering their own children, they are likely to get very angry with you.

Just like the ancient Aztecs, they really, really like having the option of terminating any unwanted child.

Sadly, in the United States most of the women that are having abortions actually claim to be Christians…

The church has connections with many women who choose abortion, Care Net research found. In the survey of 1,038 women who have had abortions, 70 percent claim a Christian religious preference, and 43 percent report attending church monthly or more at the time of an abortion.

The way that we treat the most vulnerable members of our society reveals who we really are.

And just like the Aztecs, if we stay on the path that we are on things will not end well for us.

Unfortunately, support for legal abortion continues to rise in this country, and it will undoubtedly be a major political issue once again in 2024.

That will definitely be a help to the Democrats, although many Republican politicians are increasingly embracing legal abortion as they seek to move more toward “the middle”.

Michael’s new book entitled “End Times” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com, and you can check out his new Substack newsletter right here.

Forget #MeToo—we’re now in an era where not wanting to be around a naked person of the opposite sex makes you a bigot breaking the law, not a victim of sexual harassment.

Amazingly, it gets even worse: You can’t be a woman and refuse to touch a naked man, as long as he identifies as female. How sad that the suffragettes aren’t alive to witness our new glorious era.

In Washington state, a brave Korean spa dared to stand up for women-only spaces—and got shot down by a district court judge this week.

In 2020, Haven Wilvich, a man who identifies as female, filed a complaint with the Washington State Human Rights Commission saying that Olympus Spa would not allow him to enter. Olympus Spa, which has two locations in the Seattle area, is a women’s spa that has nude female patrons in several areas.

In fact, the spa requires women to be nude: “Nor is nudity optional. It is allegedly ‘required for certain procedures called ‘Seshin’’ pursuant to Korean tradition,” writes U.S. District Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, of the Western District of Washington, in her decision.

The spa does not allow men to enter. Why? Well, these spa employees have religious beliefs about modesty. According to Rothstein’s decision, the plaintiffs in the case—the owner of the spa, four of its employees, and a regular customer—don’t think, because of their Christian beliefs, that men and women should see each other naked outside of marriage.

The plaintiffs also have a religious conviction that women’s privacy deserves to be respected.

“Women are in a vulnerable position when they are unclothed and/or having treatment while unclothed and we seek to ensure that they feel their privacy and rights are respected,” the plaintiffs stated, according to Rothstein’s decision. “This is a biblical principle from 1 Peter 3:7, 1 Timothy 3:1-7, 1 Timothy 5:2, Phillipians 4:3, Genesis 1:27, Proverbs 31:17, Phillipians 2:3 and more.”

But when it’s religious liberty vs. an aggressive transgender agenda, apparently the transgender agenda wins in Washington state.

And to be clear, Olympus Spa even had this accommodation: Men could enter the spa if they had “gone through post-operative sex confirmation surgery.”

But in 2023, demanding that penises be kept out of a woman’s spa is oh, so retro—and illegal.

Olympus Spa President Sun Lee told the Washington State Human Rights Commission in early 2021, after it had asked the spa about Wilvich’s complaint, that the female-only rule was important because of Korean cultural traditions and a desire to avoid sexual harassment.

“Mr. Lee … detailed the ‘cultural underpinnings’ of the services offered at Olympus Spa—services ‘closely tied to the Korean tradition known as jjimjilbang[.]’ In Olympus Spa’s view, ‘nudity and females-only … cannot be segregated from the cultural requirements for ‘seshin’ services[.]’” wrote Rothstein.

Furthermore, the spa noted in its 2021 response that it was concerned about sexual harassment.

Rothstein continued in her ruling: “Citing Washington’s laws on lewd conduct, facilitating lewd conduct, and public indecency, Mr. Lee conveyed his fear that exposing female customers (especially minors) to male genitalia could subject Olympus Spa to criminal penalties.”

The Washington State Human Rights Commission, which upholds the state’s antidiscrimination laws, was not swayed, finding that Olympus Spa’s policy discriminated based on gender identity.

So let’s take a moment to digest this. Staying true to cultural traditions and practices? Illegal. Violating cultural norms and traditions? Legal.

Preventing underage girls from being in the same area as a naked man? Illegal. Allowing adult naked men visual access to underage naked girls? Legal.

Olympus Spa ultimately settled with the ironically named Washington State Human Rights Commission, but in 2022, brought forward a lawsuit saying that the enforcement of state antidiscrimination laws violated their First Amendment rights.

Rothstein dismissed that lawsuit with her Monday decision upholding the commission’s finding that Olympus Spa’s women-only rules violate state law.

It’s not the first time that aggressive men have tried to invade women’s spaces.

In Canada, Jessica Yaniv—a man who identifies as female—filed discrimination complaints against women estheticians who wouldn’t wax his genitals. In 2019, the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal found that “human rights legislation does not require a service provider to wax a type of genitals they are not trained for and have not consented to wax,” reported CBC News. What a win for common sense—and women.

Or let’s take the 2021 case of the Wi Spa incident in Los Angeles. Women complained to staff that they saw a man, penis visible, in their spa. Employees said they couldn’t do anything because of local laws.

Later, Darren Merager, a man who identifies as female, was charged with “exposing an erect penis to four women and a minor girl,” reported the New York Post. Merager told the Post that he was innocent and didn’t have an erection.

The Post also detailed other times Merager was suspected of or charged with indecent exposure—all of which Merager maintains were misunderstandings or incidents of transphobia.

The case appears to be ongoing. In February, Los Angeles magazine reported a judge held a pretrial hearing and said the case could move forward. But in the meantime … what about women?

Well, in Washington state, they’re hardly of importance, clearly. Perhaps one day we’ll view “Let them see penises” as being as out of touch as the phrase attributed to Marie Antoinette.

But for now, the revolution marches on. Penises are here to stay in women’s spaces—and the full force of state law is here to ensure that.

Article cross-posted from Daily Signal.