Comments on: The Supreme Court Is Taking Another Major Second Amendment Case — Here’s What You Need to Know

By: Kevin

Kevin — Sun, 20 Aug 2023 15:36:49 +0000

The point is he has not been convicted. We can say he should have been, but he was not. We do not convict people or strip their rights for potential future acts, which is what this does and what the Biden admin argued. Domestic violence orders should not strip rights, but if they commit crimes, they should be prosecuted.
If I shot into the air at a Whataburger…. I would have been prosecuted. Why was he still walking around and without a conviction?

By: MICHAEL N DAY

MICHAEL N DAY — Sun, 20 Aug 2023 13:56:29 +0000

The House of REPRESENTATIVES
Destroys the SECOND IN THE 90
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 1978 PASS IN THE SENATA 1978
SO VAGUE AN AMBIGUOUS
And so many AMERICANS MEN AN WOMEN are denied
The rights of the SECOND
FOR YEARS
AND A OBVIOUS THUG
Gets his Day in Court
SET UP
FIRES A GUN IN A RESTAURANT and this is MO
With a GUN
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED is all they AT THE SCOTUS
Need to UNDERSTAND
ARTICULATE it is simple in WHAT IT MEANS
SHALL NOT INFRINGE
Period
BAD PEOPLE doing Bad chit with a fire arm
WILL BE DELT WITH
BY
ONE PEOPLE
SELF DEFENSE is simple
12 Americans
Shall NOT INFRINGE

By: ontoiran

ontoiran — Sun, 20 Aug 2023 12:01:37 +0000

anyone who would fire a gun in the air because a credit card was refused should not have a gun. period.