Charles Darwin lived around the time 1809-1882, he dedicated his life to eroding the idea of God from the culture by means of using evolution. He understood that if he could use the theory of evolution to destroy or even crack the legitimacy of scripture that people would abandon the churches for “science” and that man may do as he pleases. He specifically went after the book of Genesis, beings that this book is the very foundation upon which the entire basis of scripture is founded on.
The very death of Christ is tied to the book of Genesis in a very deep and real way, and to destroy Genesis would be to destroy the purpose for Christ. Even if he could sow seeds of doubt within the public, people would leave the church for a religion of self. Darwin understood that if you eliminate God, mankind would be able to live his/her own life free of future consequences. Though this theory changed the world it led to catastrophic moral problems, for without God, how is it you base your moral authority? What becomes right and what becomes wrong, and who are you to decide such things?
There are two ways I found to be intriguing regarding a moral code without God, of course myself being a Christian understand that the moral authority comes from God via the biblical text. One of these ideas is that morality can only arise from that of freedom, where there are no rules and mankind can live as he pleases. It is through this freedom that mankind will find the moral authority that resides within himself, and having laws and boundaries impede the ability for the individual to find this moral authority within. The more I read Carl Jung, the more I believe his writings align with this sort of ideology.
“Without freedom there can be no morality.”
-The Relation between the Ego and the Unconscious
“Morality is not imposed from outside; we have it in ourselves from the start – not the law, but our moral nature without which the collective life of human society would be impossible.”
-CW 7, On Eros Theory
I can see this moral code being implemented within the realm of cultural morality. The idea that everyone assimilating to that of their fellow man within a small community to reach peace is a very noble gesture. But with no bounds of freedom, with no laws, each man is left to his or her own heart to decide what is good and what is evil.
What one man finds good, another may find evil, and with no laws to keep any thought or action in check the power vacuums will be filled by he who carries the larger stick, and rules of law will be implemented regardless. These laws will then be subjected to the mind of the individual in power as to what he or she deems to be good or evil. Granted, I am not nearly as smart as Carl Jung, these are simply my humble thoughts on the matter.
The other philosopher whom I tend to agree with more than Jung’s ideology regarding a morality without God is Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) who lived around the same time of Charles Darwin. He spent his entire life criticizing the Christian faith, even though he understood that it was necessary in order to set up a moral guide as a basis to life. He had quite an admiration for the Old Testament and God being a figure of authority holding each man accountable to their every action lest they face absolute judgement. It was the New Testament that he found issue with the most.
I believe he couldn’t understand the ability for an all powerful God to give his son for a world of innately evil human beings. But Nietzsche was the father of Nihilism and to go your entire life believing there is no meaning to it, I understand how hard it would be to understand such a loving a gracious God. Nietzsche believed that should God be pushed out and replaced with “science” that it would create a moral vacuum.
With all the advancements of man in their new found love for science, it would create a moral vacuum, after all morality is not a scientific discovery, and Nietzsche understood this. Nietzsche was an incredible smart thinker, even he stated that he could pack more knowledge into a single sentence than other men could fit inside an entire book, and I don’t think he’s wrong in that regard.
You may know the statement “God is Dead” by Friedrich Nietzsche. This was not a claim of victory or triumph, rather it was a humbling remark made with regret. It drives me absolutely INSANE how many people, especially Christians take him out of context.
We as Christians know that God is very much alive. But put yourself in his shoes, a nihilist with no meaning to life, no future for eternity, believing that mankind is rotten to the core and understanding that the Bible is the most fundamental understanding of morality to keep society in check.
Upon seeing science come into his world and eliminating scripture altogether opened a vacuum in the world of morality that would be filled by the ambitions of man to be as gods. Nietzsche understood that with this new way of life, mankind would be subject to those with the most power. His predictions of the gulags in Russia and the concentration camps in Germany would be the outcome of disregarding scripture as a moral authority. Now, I challenge you to read the quote in its entirety as a broken man, filled with sorrow over a culture that abandoned scripture.
“God is dead, God Remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers? What was the holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?”
If you rip God out of the world and cast him to the side you must then assume the responsibility of creating a moral code throughout the world for a basis of right and wrong. We know what happens when men try to preform such things. If you don’t think that the Gulags of Russia can’t come to the United States then I suggest you begin to study the evils of humanity and what better place to start than with yourself.
The urges and the impulses you fight on a daily basis when those evil thoughts posses your mind, but yet, you restrain yourself because you know you will be held accountable for those actions. Imagine if there was no accountability, or if the law fed into the nature of the monster within you. We criticize other nations for their heinous acts while we all live our daily lives in bliss as our nation murders 125,000 children every day.
When we become gods we decide what is good and what is evil without any regard to a foundational moral authority. Rather we focus on what is immediately expedient and gratifying to ones own self, regardless of the future or of other human life. Even as one of Christianity’s biggest critics, Nietzsche understood that mankind could never take on such a massive task of becoming as gods. We as mankind fall into a religion of self, we project our own emotions and life experiences into policies and laws that negate taking into account the experiences of others as individuals.
This is what the left does, they have no God within their religion of self and it is far too hard to create a moral code for the individual, rather they create a moral code for groups of people based on race. Affirmative action makes it easier to get into higher education based on the color of your skin and not on the ability that a person may possess.
They believe that African American’s are far to weak to accomplish anything on their own, so the left must march for them and show them what they deserve. They lift up people like George Floyd as heroes because they don’t think that African Americans have it within themselves to become something more than street criminals. They discredit scholars such as Thomas Sowell and Ben Carson because they don’t act a certain way, or believe things that they don’t believe therefore they can’t be black.
Joe Biden himself told the African American community, that if you don’t vote for him, you ain’t black. The left tells whites, they are racist even if they don’t believe they are, simply because it is far easier to take an entire race and show them into the same bucket than what it is to look at people as individuals. They do the same thing with children, if the child becomes a hinderance to their lives, or impedes in any way on their future plans, they simply allow a doctor to rip apart the child limb from limb. Their blood curdling screams of “women empowerment” become muffled behind the walls of dismembered children. The potential of the African American child within a poverty stricken community is thrown to the curb after being told by the liberal left that the most you can become in your life is a victim.
We have left God out of our culture, some like Nietzsche may claim that “God is Dead” and we are reaping the consequences for those actions. Nothing could be further from the truth, God is very much so alive and it’s time that we as Bible believing Christians start acting like it. We must take control of this country and implement a culture that has a moral foundation based on scripture and start treating people as individuals.
We have the answers on what is good and what is evil, and how it is we are to live our lives. We have the moral authority that leads to true freedom, and a loving and just father who will judge us not on the color of our skin, but on the actions we took as individuals.
‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including us
Just when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.
For the last few months, NOQ Report, Conservative Playbook, and the American Conservative Movement have appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip.
It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. Both of our YouTube accounts were banned. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Medium canceled us. Apple canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics.
The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancellation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth.
The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects, including death. One of our stories about the Johnson & Johnson “vaccine” causing blood clots was “fact-checked” and removed one day before the government hit the brakes on it. These questions and news items are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting canceled.
There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ, CP, and ACM readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $4100 per month in order to maintain operations.
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies.
During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology.
We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
All ORIGINAL content on this site is © 2021 NOQ Report. All REPUBLISHED content has received direct or implied permission for reproduction.
With that said, our content may be reproduced and distributed as long as it has a link to the original source and the author is credited prominently. We don’t mind you using our content as long as you help out by giving us credit with a prominent link. If you feel like giving us a tip for the content, we will not object!
JD Rucker – EIC